Literature DB >> 35681696

Personalised Risk Prediction in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Protocol for a Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial.

Stephanie Archer1,2, Nichola Fennell3, Ellen Colvin4, Rozelle Laquindanum5, Meredith Mills5, Romy Dennis3, Francisca Stutzin Donoso1, Rochelle Gold3, Alice Fan5, Kate Downes6, James Ford5,7, Antonis C Antoniou8, Allison W Kurian5,9, D Gareth Evans4,10, Marc Tischkowitz3.   

Abstract

Women who test positive for an inherited pathogenic/likely pathogenic gene variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM are at an increased risk of developing certain types of cancer-specifically breast (all) and epithelial ovarian cancer (only BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2). Women receive broad cancer risk figures that are not personalised (e.g., 44-63% lifetime risk of breast cancer for those with PALB2). Broad, non-personalised risk estimates may be problematic for women when they are considering how to manage their risk. Multifactorial-risk-prediction tools have the potential to deliver personalised risk estimates. These may be useful in the patient's decision-making process and impact uptake of risk-management options. This randomised control trial (registration number to follow), based in genetic centres in the UK and US, will randomise participants on a 1:1 basis to either receive conventional cancer risk estimates, as per routine clinical practice, or to receive a personalised risk estimate. This personalised risk estimate will be calculated using the CanRisk risk prediction tool, which combines the patient's genetic result, family history and polygenic risk score (PRS), along with hormonal and lifestyle factors. Women's decision-making around risk management will be monitored using questionnaires, completed at baseline (pre-appointment) and follow-up (one, three and twelve months after receiving their risk assessment). The primary outcome for this study is the type and timing of risk management options (surveillance, chemoprevention, surgery) taken up over the course of the study (i.e., 12 months). The type of risk-management options planned to be taken up in the future (i.e., beyond the end of the study) and the potential impact of personalised risk estimates on women's psychosocial health will be collected as secondary-outcome measures. This study will also assess the acceptability, feasibility and cost-effectiveness of using personalised risk estimates in clinical care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CanRisk; breast cancer; epithelial ovarian cancer; genetics; personalised risk prediction; polygenic risk scores

Year:  2022        PMID: 35681696      PMCID: PMC9179465          DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.575


  44 in total

Review 1.  Oral contraceptive use and breast or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 carriers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Iodice; M Barile; N Rotmensz; I Feroce; B Bonanni; P Radice; L Bernard; P Maisonneuve; S Gandini
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  The psychological costs of inadequate cervical smear test results: three-month follow-up.

Authors:  David P French; Esther Maissi; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Fearing the unknown: a short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale.

Authors:  R Nicholas Carleton; M A Peter J Norton; Gordon J G Asmundson
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2006-05-02

4.  Beyond interviews and focus groups: a framework for integrating innovative qualitative methods into randomised controlled trials of complex public health interventions.

Authors:  Katy Davis; Nicole Minckas; Virginia Bond; Cari Jo Clark; Tim Colbourn; Sarah J Drabble; Therese Hesketh; Zelee Hill; Joanna Morrison; Oliver Mweemba; David Osrin; Audrey Prost; Janet Seeley; Maryam Shahmanesh; Esther J Spindler; Erin Stern; Katrina M Turner; Jenevieve Mannell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 6.  Effect of bilateral oophorectomy on women's long-term health.

Authors:  William H Parker; Vanessa Jacoby; Donna Shoupe; Walter Rocca
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2009-09

7.  Qualitative methods in a randomised controlled trial: the role of an integrated qualitative process evaluation in providing evidence to discontinue the intervention in one arm of a trial of a decision support tool.

Authors:  M J Murtagh; R G Thomson; C R May; T Rapley; B R Heaven; R H Graham; E F Kaner; L Stobbart; M P Eccles
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-06

8.  Do cancer risk and benefit-harm ratios influence women's consideration of risk-reducing mastectomy? A scenario-based experiment in five European countries.

Authors:  Felix G Rebitschek; Nora Pashayan; Martin Widschwendter; Odette Wegwarth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; John L Hopper; Daniel R Barnes; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Thea M Mooij; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Sarah Jervis; Flora E van Leeuwen; Roger L Milne; Nadine Andrieu; David E Goldgar; Mary Beth Terry; Matti A Rookus; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou; Lesley McGuffog; D Gareth Evans; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; Julian Adlard; Kai-Ren Ong; Louise Izatt; Marc Tischkowitz; Ros Eeles; Rosemarie Davidson; Shirley Hodgson; Steve Ellis; Catherine Nogues; Christine Lasset; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Laurence Faivre; Pascaline Berthet; Maartje J Hooning; Lizet E van der Kolk; Carolien M Kets; Muriel A Adank; Esther M John; Wendy K Chung; Irene L Andrulis; Melissa Southey; Mary B Daly; Saundra S Buys; Ana Osorio; Christoph Engel; Karin Kast; Rita K Schmutzler; Trinidad Caldes; Anna Jakubowska; Jacques Simard; Michael L Friedlander; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Eva Machackova; Lenka Foretova; Yen Y Tan; Christian F Singer; Edith Olah; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Brita Arver; Håkan Olsson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Validation of the BOADICEA model and a 313-variant polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk prediction in a Dutch prospective cohort.

Authors:  Inge M M Lakeman; Mar Rodríguez-Girondo; Andrew Lee; Rikje Ruiter; Bruno H Stricker; Sara R A Wijnant; Maryam Kavousi; Antonis C Antoniou; Marjanka K Schmidt; André G Uitterlinden; Jeroen van Rooij; Peter Devilee
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 8.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.