Literature DB >> 16184520

The psychological costs of inadequate cervical smear test results: three-month follow-up.

David P French1, Esther Maissi, Theresa M Marteau.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that upon receipt of inadequate cervical smear test results, women have elevated levels of state anxiety and concern about their test results, similar to those of women receiving abnormal smear test results. The current paper reports data on the psychological impact three months after receiving an inadequate smear test result. Two groups of women who initially received a normal test result (n=184) or either a first or non-consecutive inadequate smear test result (n=140) responded. Women with initially received inadequate smear test results no longer had higher state anxiety than women who received normal test results. However, women who initially received inadequate smear test results were still more concerned about their test results and less satisfied with the information they had received about these initial test results, even after receiving normal results from repeat cervical smear tests. Concern was strongly predicted by dissatisfaction with information provided about inadequate smear test results. These results underscore the need to improve communication about inadequate cervical smear test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16184520     DOI: 10.1002/pon.980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  6 in total

1.  Spontaneous reactions to health risk feedback: a network perspective.

Authors:  Martina Panzer; Britta Renner
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-02-18

2.  Personalised Risk Prediction in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Protocol for a Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Stephanie Archer; Nichola Fennell; Ellen Colvin; Rozelle Laquindanum; Meredith Mills; Romy Dennis; Francisca Stutzin Donoso; Rochelle Gold; Alice Fan; Kate Downes; James Ford; Antonis C Antoniou; Allison W Kurian; D Gareth Evans; Marc Tischkowitz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Qualitative study of women's anxiety and information needs after a diagnosis of cervical dysplasia.

Authors:  Gitte Lee Mortensen; Anny Lisbeth Adeler
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2010-03-31

4.  Acceptability of anal cancer screening tests for women living with HIV in the EVVA study.

Authors:  E Kaufman; C de Castro; T Williamson; B Lessard; M Munoz; M H Mayrand; A N Burchell; M B Klein; L Charest; M Auger; V Marcus; F Coutlée; A de Pokomandy
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Emotional impact of screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruth E Collins; Laureen M Lopez; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Are people with negative diabetes screening tests falsely reassured? Parallel group cohort study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Charlotte A M Paddison; Helen C Eborall; Stephen Sutton; David P French; Joana Vasconcelos; A Toby Prevost; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-11-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.