Literature DB >> 16455635

The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.

Einat Even-Sapir1, Ur Metser, Eyal Mishani, Gennady Lievshitz, Hedva Lerman, Ilan Leibovitch.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to compare the detection of bone metastases by 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) planar bone scintigraphy (BS), SPECT, 18F-Fluoride PET, and 18F-Fluoride PET/CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
METHODS: In a prospective study, BS and 18F-Fluoride PET/CT were performed on the same day in 44 patients with high-risk prostate cancer. In 20 of the latter patients planar BS was followed by single field-of-view (FOV) SPECT and in 24 patients by multi-FOV SPECT of the axial skeleton. Lesions were interpreted separately on each of the 4 modalities as normal, benign, equivocal, or malignant.
RESULTS: In patient-based analysis, 23 patients had skeletal metastatic spread (52%) and 21 did not. Categorizing equivocal and malignant interpretation as suggestive for malignancy, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of planar BS were 70%, 57%, 64%, and 55%, respectively, of multi-FOV SPECT were 92%, 82%, 86%, and 90%, of (18)F-Fluoride PET were 100%, 62%, 74%, and 100%, and of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT were 100% for all parameters. Using the McNemar test, 18F-Fluoride PET/CT was statistically more sensitive and more specific than planar or SPECT BS (P < 0.05) and more specific than 18F-Fluoride PET (P < 0.001). SPECT was statistically more sensitive and more specific than planar BS (P < 0.05) but was less sensitive than 18F-Fluoride PET (P < 0.05). In lesion-based analysis, 156 lesions with increased uptake of 18F-Fluoride were assessed. Based on the corresponding appearance on CT, lesions were categorized by PET/CT as benign (n = 99), osteoblastic metastasis (n = 46), or equivocal when CT was normal (n = 11). Of the 156 18F-Fluoride lesions, 81 lesions (52%), including 34 metastases, were overlooked with normal appearance on planar BS. SPECT identified 62% of the lesions overlooked by planar BS. 18F-Fluoride PET/CT was more sensitive and more specific than BS (P < 0.001) and more specific than PET alone (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: 18F-Fluoride PET/CT is a highly sensitive and specific modality for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. It is more specific than 18F-Fluoride PET alone and more sensitive and specific than planar and SPECT BS. Detection of bone metastases is improved by SPECT compared with planar BS and by 18F-Fluoride PET compared with SPECT. This added value of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT may beneficially impact the clinical management of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16455635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  229 in total

1.  Comparison of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and 99mTc-DPD-SPECT/CT for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients: Additional value of morphologic information from low dose CT.

Authors:  Jan-Carlo Janssen; Sebastian Meißner; Nadine Woythal; Vikas Prasad; Winfried Brenner; Gerd Diederichs; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The improved accuracy of planar bone scintigraphy by adding single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) to detect skeletal metastases from prostate cancer.

Authors:  L C McLoughlin; F O'Kelly; C O'Brien; M Sheikh; J Feeney; W Torreggiani; J A Thornhill
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  [11C]Choline PET/CT detection of bone metastases in patients with PSA progression after primary treatment for prostate cancer: comparison with bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Maria Picchio; Elena Giulia Spinapolice; Federico Fallanca; Cinzia Crivellaro; Giampiero Giovacchini; Luigi Gianolli; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Androgen-independent molecular imaging vectors to detect castration-resistant and metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ziyue Karen Jiang; Makoto Sato; Liu H Wei; Chinghai Kao; Lily Wu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  The kinetics and reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride for oncology using current PET camera technology.

Authors:  Karen A Kurdziel; Joanna H Shih; Andrea B Apolo; Liza Lindenberg; Esther Mena; Yolanda Y McKinney; Stephen S Adler; Baris Turkbey; William Dahut; James L Gulley; Ravi A Madan; Ola Landgren; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Bone metabolic activity in hyperostosis cranialis interna measured with 18F-fluoride PET.

Authors:  Jérôme J Waterval; Thijs M A Van Dongen; Robert J Stokroos; Jaap G J Teule; Gerrit J Kemerink; Boudewijn Brans; Fred H M Nieman; Johannes J Manni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  GCPII imaging and cancer.

Authors:  C A Foss; R C Mease; S Y Cho; H J Kim; M G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  18F-fluoride PET/CT for detection of sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Klaus Strobel; Dorothee R Fischer; Giorgio Tamborrini; Diego Kyburz; Katrin D M Stumpe; Rolf G X Hesselmann; A Johayem; Gustav K von Schulthess; Beat A Michel; Adrian Ciurea
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Bone-Targeted Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrei H Iagaru; Erik Mittra; Patrick M Colletti; Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  [Focus on molecular imaging in prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Michaud; K A Touijer
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 0.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.