Literature DB >> 35679576

Patient and Provider Web-Based Decision Support for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Katherine D Crew1,2,3, Gauri Bhatkhande2, Thomas Silverman4, Jacquelyn Amenta1, Tarsha Jones5, Julia E McGuinness1,3, Jennie Mata1,3, Ashlee Guzman1,3, Ting He6, Jill Dimond7, Wei-Yann Tsai3,8, Rita Kukafka3,4,9.   

Abstract

Significant underutilization of breast cancer chemoprevention remains, despite guidelines stating that physicians should recommend chemoprevention with antiestrogen therapy to high-risk women. We randomized women, ages 35 to 75 years, who met high-risk criteria for breast cancer, without a personal history of breast cancer or prior chemoprevention use, to standard educational materials alone or combined with a web-based decision aid. All healthcare providers, including primary care providers and breast specialists, were given access to a web-based decision support tool. The primary endpoint was chemoprevention uptake at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included decision antecedents (perceived breast cancer risk/worry, chemoprevention knowledge, self-efficacy) and decision quality (decision conflict, chemoprevention informed choice) based upon patient surveys administered at baseline, 1 and 6 months after randomization. Among 282 evaluable high-risk women enrolled from November 2016 to March 2020, mean age was 57 years (SD, 9.9) and mean 5-year invasive breast cancer risk was 2.98% (SD, 1.42). There was no significant difference in chemoprevention uptake at 6 months between the intervention and control groups (2.1% vs. 3.5%). Comparing the intervention and control arms at 1 month, there were significant differences among high-risk women in accurate breast cancer risk perceptions (56% vs. 39%, P = 0.017), adequate chemoprevention knowledge (49% vs. 27%, P < 0.001), mean decision conflict (34.0 vs. 47.0, P < 0.001), and informed choice (41% vs. 23%, P = 0.003). These differences were no longer significant at 6 months. Although our decision support tools did not result in a significant increase in chemoprevention uptake, we did observe improvements in decision antecedents and decision quality measures. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: In this randomized controlled trial of decision support for 300 high-risk women and 50 healthcare providers, we did not observe a significant increase in chemoprevention uptake, which remained low at under 5%. However, these decision support tools may increase knowledge and informed choice about breast cancer chemoprevention. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35679576      PMCID: PMC9532364          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  51 in total

1.  Usability Testing of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Among Multi-Ethnic Women.

Authors:  Austin M Coe; William Ueng; Jennifer M Vargas; Raven David; Alejandro Vanegas; Katherine Infante; Meghna Trivedi; Haeseung Yi; Jill Dimond; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  Breast cancer chemoprevention: the saga of underuse continues.

Authors:  D Lawrence Wickerham; Victor G Vogel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  "Why take it if you don't have anything?" breast cancer risk perceptions and prevention choices at a public hospital.

Authors:  Talya Salant; Pamela S Ganschow; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Women's interest in taking tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer prevention: response to a tailored decision aid.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Amanda J Dillard; Dylan M Smith; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Rosemarie Pitsch; Jennifer B McClure; Sarah Greene; Sharon Hensley Alford; Vijayan Nair; Daniel F Hayes; Cheryl Wiese; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  The use of preventive measures among healthy women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Carrie Snyder; Jennifer Seidel; Danielle Hanna; Henry T Lynch; Steven Narod
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  J P Costantino; M H Gail; D Pee; S Anderson; C K Redmond; J Benichou; H S Wieand
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Measuring perceptions of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Andrea Gurmankin Levy; Judy Shea; Sankey V Williams; Alex Quistberg; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Psychological and clinical factors implicated in decision making about a trial of low-dose tamoxifen in hormone replacement therapy users.

Authors:  Gabriella Rondanina; Matteo Puntoni; Gianluca Severi; Clara Varricchio; Anna Zunino; Irene Feroce; Bernardo Bonanni; Andrea Decensi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Anastrozole for prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women (IBIS-II): an international, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Ivana Sestak; John F Forbes; Mitch Dowsett; Jill Knox; Simon Cawthorn; Christobel Saunders; Nicola Roche; Robert E Mansel; Gunter von Minckwitz; Bernardo Bonanni; Tiina Palva; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Oral low dose and topical tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: modern approaches for an old drug.

Authors:  Matteo Lazzeroni; Davide Serrano; Barbara K Dunn; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Oukseub Lee; Seema Khan; Andrea Decensi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  1 in total

1.  Qualitative analysis of shared decision-making for chemoprevention in the primary care setting: provider-related barriers.

Authors:  Tarsha Jones; Thomas Silverman; Ashlee Guzman; Julia E McGuinness; Meghna S Trivedi; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.298

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.