Literature DB >> 24333009

Anastrozole for prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women (IBIS-II): an international, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Jack Cuzick1, Ivana Sestak2, John F Forbes3, Mitch Dowsett4, Jill Knox2, Simon Cawthorn5, Christobel Saunders6, Nicola Roche7, Robert E Mansel8, Gunter von Minckwitz9, Bernardo Bonanni10, Tiina Palva11, Anthony Howell12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors effectively prevent breast cancer recurrence and development of new contralateral tumours in postmenopausal women. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole for prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women who are at high risk of the disease.
METHODS: Between Feb 2, 2003, and Jan 31, 2012, we recruited postmenopausal women aged 40-70 years from 18 countries into an international, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. To be eligible, women had to be at increased risk of breast cancer (judged on the basis of specific criteria). Eligible women were randomly assigned (1:1) by central computer allocation to receive 1 mg oral anastrozole or matching placebo every day for 5 years. Randomisation was stratified by country and was done with blocks (size six, eight, or ten). All trial personnel, participants, and clinicians were masked to treatment allocation; only the trial statistician was unmasked. The primary endpoint was histologically confirmed breast cancer (invasive cancers or non-invasive ductal carcinoma in situ). Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN31488319.
FINDINGS: 1920 women were randomly assigned to receive anastrozole and 1944 to placebo. After a median follow-up of 5·0 years (IQR 3·0-7·1), 40 women in the anastrozole group (2%) and 85 in the placebo group (4%) had developed breast cancer (hazard ratio 0·47, 95% CI 0·32-0·68, p<0·0001). The predicted cumulative incidence of all breast cancers after 7 years was 5·6% in the placebo group and 2·8% in the anastrozole group. 18 deaths were reported in the anastrozole group and 17 in the placebo group, and no specific causes were more common in one group than the other (p=0·836).
INTERPRETATION: Anastrozole effectively reduces incidence of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women. This finding, along with the fact that most of the side-effects associated with oestrogen deprivation were not attributable to treatment, provides support for the use of anastrozole in postmenopausal women at high risk of breast cancer. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Sanofi-Aventis, and AstraZeneca.
Copyright © 2014 Cuzick et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24333009     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62292-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  174 in total

1.  Usability Testing of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Among Multi-Ethnic Women.

Authors:  Austin M Coe; William Ueng; Jennifer M Vargas; Raven David; Alejandro Vanegas; Katherine Infante; Meghna Trivedi; Haeseung Yi; Jill Dimond; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Breast Cancer Biomarkers: CALGB 70806 (Alliance) Study Design and Baseline Data.

Authors:  Ogheneruona Apoe; Sin-Ho Jung; Heshan Liu; Drew K Seisler; Jayne Charlamb; Patricia Zekan; Lili X Wang; Gary W Unzeitig; Judy Garber; James Marshall; Marie Wood
Journal:  Am J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-07

3.  Chemoprevention Uptake among Women with Atypical Hyperplasia and Lobular and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Meghna S Trivedi; Austin M Coe; Alejandro Vanegas; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-06-13

4.  Extent of atypical hyperplasia stratifies breast cancer risk in 2 independent cohorts of women.

Authors:  Amy C Degnim; William D Dupont; Derek C Radisky; Robert A Vierkant; Ryan D Frank; Marlene H Frost; Stacey J Winham; Melinda E Sanders; Jeffrey R Smith; David L Page; Tanya L Hoskin; Celine M Vachon; Karthik Ghosh; Tina J Hieken; Lori A Denison; Jodi M Carter; Lynn C Hartmann; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Symptoms and Symptom Attribution Among Women on Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Annette L Stanton; Keith J Petrie; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-01

6.  Duration of tamoxifen use and the risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Jacek Gronwald; Andre Robidoux; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Nadine Tung; Henry T Lynch; William D Foulkes; Siranoush Manoukian; Peter Ainsworth; Susan L Neuhausen; Rochelle Demsky; Andrea Eisen; Christian F Singer; Howard Saal; Leigha Senter; Charis Eng; Jeffrey Weitzel; Pal Moller; Dawna M Gilchrist; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Ophira Ginsburg; Ping Sun; Tomasz Huzarski; Jan Lubinski; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Overdiagnosis in breast cancer chemoprevention trials.

Authors:  V Sopik; S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Acceptance and adherence to chemoprevention among women at increased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; William Fulp; Elizabeth Matos Gomez; Elissa Clayton; Sharon Tollin; Nazanin Khakpour; Christine Laronga; Marie Catherine Lee; John V Kiluk
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Barriers and Facilitators to Patient-Provider Communication When Discussing Breast Cancer Risk to Aid in the Development of Decision Support Tools.

Authors:  Haeseung Yi; Tong Xiao; Parijatham S Thomas; Alejandra N Aguirre; Cindy Smalletz; Jill Dimond; Joseph Finkelstein; Katherine Infante; Meghna Trivedi; Raven David; Jennifer Vargas; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 10.  Molecular cancer prevention: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Karen Colbert Maresso; Kenneth Y Tsai; Powel H Brown; Eva Szabo; Scott Lippman; Ernest T Hawk
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.