Literature DB >> 18349406

Psychological and clinical factors implicated in decision making about a trial of low-dose tamoxifen in hormone replacement therapy users.

Gabriella Rondanina1, Matteo Puntoni, Gianluca Severi, Clara Varricchio, Anna Zunino, Irene Feroce, Bernardo Bonanni, Andrea Decensi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the sociodemographic, health-related, and psychological factors that influence the decision of women on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to participate in a phase III trial of low-dose tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical and psychological factors were assessed in 265 women who accepted and 192 women who refused to participate in a proposed trial. Health-related and sociodemographic factors included age, Gail risk, body mass index, education, current HRT use, regular mammographic screening, smoking habit, physical activity, alcohol use, concern about adverse effects, and physician recommendation. Psychological factors included breast cancer-related worry, absolute and comparative cancer risk perception, anxiety, and depression.
RESULTS: The most frequent reasons for entry were willingness to participate in a research program (60%), the need/desire to receive frequent medical care (58%), and the desire to contribute to medical knowledge (44%); whereas reasons for refusal included fear of medication abuse (33%), concern about adverse effects (31%), and physician advice against enrollment (24%). In a logistic model, after adjusting for current HRT use, the trial participation was directly associated with satisfaction with clearly explained study objectives (odds ratio [OR] = 9.33; 95% CI, 4.04 to 21.55) and inversely associated with high breast cancer worry (OR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.77) and age > or = 60 years (OR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.73).
CONCLUSION: Participation in a chemoprevention trial among HRT users is associated with a younger age, no breast cancer worry, and satisfaction with health care providers, suggesting a condition of psychological well-being as a promoting factor and emphasizing the importance of thorough counseling at study presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349406     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  21 in total

Review 1.  Reasons for and against participation in studies of medicinal therapies for women with breast cancer: a debate.

Authors:  Gero Luschin; Marion Habersack; Irmina-Anna Gerlich
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Laura L Reimers; Parijatham S Sivasubramanian; Dawn Hershman; Mary Beth Terry; Heather Greenlee; Julie Campbell; Kevin Kalinsky; Matthew Maurer; Ramona Jayasena; Rossy Sandoval; Maria Alvarez; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Addressing barriers to uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention for patients and providers.

Authors:  Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

4.  Cigarette smoking, obesity, physical activity, and alcohol use as predictors of chemoprevention adherence in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Stephanie R Land; Walter M Cronin; D Lawrence Wickerham; Joseph P Costantino; Nicholas J Christian; William M P Klein; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-08-23

5.  Chemoprevention Trial Feasibility Using Botanicals in Exceptionally High Risk Populations for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Nagi B Kumar; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Mark G Alexandrow; Jhanelle Gray; Michael Schell; Steve Sutton; Eric B Haura
Journal:  J Clin Trials       Date:  2014-09

6.  Tamoxifen vs Raloxifene vs Exemestane for Chemoprevention.

Authors:  Laura Reimers; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-09-01

7.  Patient and Provider Web-Based Decision Support for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Katherine D Crew; Gauri Bhatkhande; Thomas Silverman; Jacquelyn Amenta; Tarsha Jones; Julia E McGuinness; Jennie Mata; Ashlee Guzman; Ting He; Jill Dimond; Wei-Yann Tsai; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2022-10-04

Review 8.  Exemestane for breast cancer prevention: a critical shift?

Authors:  Andrea Decensi; Barbara K Dunn; Matteo Puntoni; Alessandra Gennari; Leslie G Ford
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  'No Pink Ribbons': How Women's Lived Experiences With Breast Atypia Inform Decisions Involving Risk-Reducing Medications.

Authors:  Sarah L Goff; Reva Kleppel; Grace Makari-Judson
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2018-04-26

10.  Acceptability of cancer chemoprevention trials: impact of the design.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Maisonneuve; Laetitia Huiart; Laetitia Rabayrol; Doug Horsman; Remi Didelot; Hagay Sobol; Francois Eisinger
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.