| Literature DB >> 35671174 |
Talita B Gagliardi1, Ethan Iverson1, Emma J DeGrace2, Brad R Rosenberg2, Margaret A Scull1.
Abstract
A diverse collection of viral pathogens target airway epithelial cells for infection, with effects ranging from mild upper respiratory tract symptoms to death of the infected individual. Among these pathogens are recently discovered and/or emergent viruses that sometimes fail to infect commonly used, immortalized cell lines and for which infection phenotypes in the respiratory tract remain unknown. Human airway epithelial cultures have been developed over the past several decades and have proven to be a useful model system in culturing hard-to-grow viruses and assaying various features of infection in a physiologically relevant setting. This article includes methods for the generation of well-differentiated human airway epithelial cell cultures at air-liquid interface that recapitulate the mucosal epithelium of the trachea/bronchus in vivo. We further detail inoculation of these cultures with respiratory viruses-specifically rhinovirus, influenza virus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-and provide a protocol for the detection of double-stranded RNA or viral antigen-positive cells by immunofluorescence microscopy. These techniques, together with a post-imaging analysis, can be applied to characterize the efficiency of infection and kinetics of spread within the airway epithelium. Furthermore, these methods can be utilized in conjunction with antibodies against cellular targets to determine cell tropism and colocalization with specific host factors during infection.Entities:
Keywords: airway epithelium; immunofluorescence; microscopy; respiratory virus
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35671174 PMCID: PMC9202242 DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Protoc ISSN: 2691-1299
Figure 1Workflow of HAE‐ALI generation, viral inoculation, and immunofluorescence‐mediated detection of infection. Schematic diagrams depict—Top: the process of airway epithelial cell expansion, seeding on Transwell membranes, and differentiation at air‐liquid interface—Bottom: viral infection at the apical surface of differentiated HAE‐ALI, followed by culture fixation, permeabilization, and detection of infected cells using an immunofluorescence assay. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 2Undifferentiated and differentiated human airway epithelial cells cultured under air‐liquid interface conditions (HAE‐ALI). (A) Undifferentiated normal human bronchial/tracheal epithelial cells, 4 and 6 days after thawing and seeding in a T‐175 flask (brightfield; 5× magnification; scale bar = 100 µm). (B) HAE‐ALI immediately post‐airlift (5× magnification; scale bar = 100 µm). Routine visualization of the cultures was performed on a Zeiss Primovert tissue culture microscope with 4× objective Plan Achromat, while images in (A) and (B) were taken using a Zeiss Axio Observer 3 Inverted fluorescence microscope equipped with a Zeiss Axiocam 503 monochrome camera and AIM‐Zen 2007 software. (C) Histological cross‐section of differentiated HAE‐ALI with hematoxylin/eosin counterstain (brightfield, 40× magnification; scale bar = 10 µm). Image was taken using a Nikon Eclipse Upright microscope, Nikon DS‐Fi2 color camera, and Nikon Elements software. (D) Transmission electron micrograph of differentiated HAE‐ALI; cc = ciliated cell, gc = goblet cell (scale bar = 5 µm). Image was taken using a Hitachi S‐4700 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope.
Video 1Cilia beating. Video was recorded using brightfield on a Zeiss Axio Observer 3 Inverted fluorescence microscope equipped with a 10× objective lens, Zeiss Axiocam 503 monochrome camera, and AIM‐Zen 2007 software
Antibodies
| Target antigen | Primary antibody | Secondary antibody | Type of assay |
|---|---|---|---|
| dsRNA | Mouse IgG2a anti‐dsRNA (J2) monoclonal antibody (SCICONS; cat. no. 10010200; 1:1000) | Goat anti‐mouse IgG2a secondary antibody AlexaFluor 555‐conjugated (Thermo Fisher Scientific; cat. no. A‐21137; 1:200) | Indirect |
| Influenza A virus nucleoprotein (IAV‐NP) | Anti‐Influenza A Antibody, nucleoprotein, clones A1, A3 blend (Millipore; cat. no. MAB8251; 1:100) | Donkey anti‐mouse IgG H&L AlexaFluor‐488 conjugated (Thermo Fisher Scientific; cat. no. A‐21202; 1:500) | Indirect |
| SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid protein (SARS2‐N) | Mouse IgG2b monoclonal anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody, nucleocapsid protein, clone 1C7 (Bioss Antibodies; cat. no. BSM‐41411M; 1:250) | Donkey anti‐mouse IgG H&L AlexaFluor‐488 conjugated (Thermo Fisher Scientific; cat. no. A‐21202; 1:500) | Indirect |
| Motile cilia | Mouse IgG2b anti‐acetylated alpha‐tubulin (6‐11B‐1) monoclonal antibody AlexaFluor 647‐conjugated (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; cat. no. sc‐23950; 1:50) | N/A | Direct |
Figure 3Immunofluorescence‐based detection of viral and cellular antigens in differentiated HAE‐ALI. (A) Differentiated HAE‐ALI infected with rhinovirus‐C15 (1010 RNA copies) and probed for dsRNA at 12 hr post‐infection (20× magnification; scale bar = 100 µm). Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (15 min incubation), permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X‐100, and blocked with 10% normal goat serum followed by a dsRNA indirect immunostaining assay [1:1000 mouse IgG2a anti‐dsRNA antibody (J2), diluted in PBS with 1% BSA and 0.2% Tween‐20; 1:200 goat anti‐mouse IgG2a secondary antibody AlexaFluor 555‐conjugated, diluted in PBS with 1% BSA] and Hoechst 33342 nuclei stain. (B) Differentiated HAE‐ALI infected with influenza A virus (A/Puerto Rico/8/34; 5 × 104 plaque forming units) or SARS‐CoV‐2 (USA‐WA1/2020; 1 × 106 plaque forming units) and probed for viral antigen at 48 and 72 hr post‐infection, respectively. *Indicates the starting point of a “comet” of antigen‐positive cells (10× magnification; scale bars = 100 µm). Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min (IAV) or ≥24 hr (SARS‐CoV‐2), permeabilized with 2.5% Triton X‐100, and blocked with 3% BSA followed by an indirect immunostaining assay [1:100 anti‐IAV NP clones A1, A3 antibody blend or 1:500 anti‐SARS N clone 1C7 antibody (kindly provided by Thomas Moran) diluted in PBS with 1% BSA; 1:500 donkey anti‐mouse IgG H&L AlexaFluor 488‐conjugated secondary antibody diluted in PBS with 1% BSA] and Hoechst 33342 nuclei staining. (C) Differentiated HAE‐ALI were fixed with methanol:acetone (20 min incubation at −20°C) or 4% PFA (15 min incubation at room temperature), permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X‐100, and blocked with 10% normal goat serum followed by an acetylated alpha‐tubulin direct immunostaining assay [1:50 mouse IgG2b anti‐acetylated alpha‐tubulin (6‐11B‐1) monoclonal antibody AlexaFluor 647‐conjugated diluted in PBS with 1% BSA and 0.2% Tween‐20] and Hoechst 33342 nuclei staining (63× magnification; scale bar = 10 µm). (D) Z‐stack (XY, XZ, and 3D views) of differentiated HAE‐ALI 12 hr post‐infection with 1010 RNA copies of rhinovirus‐C15 immunostained sequentially for dsRNA (indirect assay), acetylated alpha‐tubulin (direct assay), and nuclei (63× magnification; scale bar = 10 µm). Images in (A) and (B) were taken using a Zeiss Axio Observer 3 inverted fluorescence microscope equipped with 10× and 20× LWD objectives, Zeiss Axiocam 503 monochrome camera, and AIM‐Zen 2007 software, while images in (C) and (D) were obtained after analysis of z‐series optical sections (at 1 µm intervals) acquired using LSM710 Zeiss Laser Scanning confocal microscope equipped with a 63×/1.4NA Oil/0.190 nm WD objective, argon laser, and AIM‐Zen 2009 software. Z‐sections were analyzed using Fiji–ImageJ v.2.1.0/1.53c software (Schindelin et al., 2012).
Troubleshooting Guide
| Problem | Probable cause | Solution | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation of HAE‐ALI | Cell death at 24 hr after thawing | Cells not stored under ideal conditions; incorrect cell density; multiple freeze/thaw cycles | Thaw a new vial of undifferentiated cells |
| Absent or slow proliferation of undifferentiated cells | Low number of cells seeded into the flask; contamination with bacteria/fungi | Use a new stock of medium; continue routine maintenance and track culture proliferation; treat with penicillin (100 U per ml) and streptomycin (100 µg per ml) or amphotericin B (0.25 to 2.5 µg per ml); monitor confluence during subculture prior to seeding on Transwells | |
| Cultures are persistently leaky (fluid is observed on the apical surface) | Culture did not reach 100% confluency prior to air‐lift or loss of epithelium integrity | Repeat differentiation using a new stock of collagen and freshly coated Transwells; ensure cell count is accurate; ensure cells have reached confluency prior to removing the apical medium | |
| Cultures fail to become ciliated | Cells have lost their differentiation capacity due to extensive passaging | Use cells at a lower passage | |
| Epithelium is not flat (ridges or cysts are observed) | Failure to wash the cultures routinely; aberrant cell growth | Avoid using cultures with these features for imaging purposes. If all cultures in a batch exhibit these alterations, initiate a new differentiation. | |
| Bacterial or fungal contamination | Poor aseptic technique | Dispose of any potentially contaminated reagents. Remove surviving cultures to a new 24‐well plate using forceps or a sterile pipette tip threaded through the Transwell basket to transfer the cultures. Monitor daily to ensure all contaminated cultures have been removed. As a last resort, you can treat the survivors with penicillin (100 U per ml) and streptomycin (100 µg per ml) or amphotericin B (0.25 to 2.5 µg per ml). Note that the treatment of differentiated HAE‐ALI with antibiotics and antimycotics may interfere with epithelium homeostasis, which includes its selective permeability. | |
| Excessive medium acidification or discoloration | Rapid growth immediately post‐air‐lift; culture contamination; fluid or medium left on the apical surface; cell growth within the basolateral chamber | Refresh basolateral medium a day early; check for visible contaminants and discard the culture or treat with penicillin (100 U per ml) and streptomycin (100 µg per ml) or amphotericin B (0.25 to 2.5 µg per ml); ensure medium does not unintentionally drip into the apical chamber during feeding; carefully add cells to the Transwell without spilling; check for growth on the basolateral surface periodically; and transfer cultures to a new 24‐well plate as needed | |
| Cell or culture integrity loss during routine maintenance | Apical cell loss during washing | Test new donor integrity against the standard washing procedure; if cell rounding or loss continues: reduce washing time, incubate at room temperature, wash more frequently during the week for less time | |
| Viral inoculation | Cytopathic effects are observed in the mock/negative controls | Diluent is cytotoxic or poorly tolerated; too much fluid has been left on the cultures |
Dialyze the virus stock against PBS; remove inoculum or reduce the volume if leaving the inoculum on for the duration of the experiment. Diluent compatibility can also be tested ahead of time by apical inoculation in HAE‐ALI followed by observation under a light microscope; measuring of cytotoxic effects by quantifying lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and/or transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER; Gagliardi et al., |
| Few cells are infected | Cultures are not fully differentiated; insufficient time for infection; excessive mucus remaining on the culture | Allow cultures more time to reach maturity; consider lowering the inoculation volume and leave the inoculum on to allow maximal time for infection; increased the number of washes prior to inoculation | |
| IF assay/microscopy | No viral antigen (e.g., dsRNA, IAV‐NP, SARS2‐N) signal is detected | Time point selected is not optimal for detection of this viral antigen | Fix cultures at different time points to determine the optimal timeframe in which to detect the viral antigen |
| Weak signal | Low levels of antigen present; insufficient antigen access; insufficient antibody incubation time | Increase amount of virus in the inoculum; change the detergent in the permeabilization step; increase the % Triton X‐100 used during permeabilization (up to 2.5%); add detergent in the primary antibody solution; increase the concentration of the primary antibody; use an indirect immunofluorescence staining approach; try a different antibody (brand or epitope) | |
| Bright spots are observed during imaging | Secondary antibody precipitation; excessive mucus present on the culture | Centrifuge the secondary antibody at high speed for 1 min prior to use; wash the cultures regularly to remove accumulated mucus | |
| High background signal | Autofluorescence; excess mucus | Use farther red‐shifted secondary antibodies; increase washes prior to fixing the culture; decrease the concentration of the secondary antibody. |