Literature DB >> 35670857

Intracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: surgical technique and short-term surgical outcome.

Masaki Aizawa1, Hiroshi Yabusaki2, Atsushi Matsuki2, Takeo Bamba2, Satoru Nakagawa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although several procedures for mechanical anastomosis have recently been reported, intracorporeal manually hand-sewn anastomosis for totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (TLPPG) is considered technically difficult. Here, we report a new technique for laparoscopic reconstruction using hand-sewn sutures.
METHODS: Together with a proper lymphadenectomy, the stomach was detached and resected using separate two-layer incisions, similar to the original laparotomy method. An approximately 5-cm antral cuff was left in place. The essential concept of this new method was to align the anastomotic site by rotating each clamped gastric stump. This allowed us to perform a secure, hand-sewn, two-layer anastomosis successfully. The short-term surgical outcome after TLPPG was retrospectively compared with that for patients who underwent a conventional laparoscopy-assisted procedure (LAPPG).
RESULTS: Of the 20 consecutive patients who underwent pylorus-preserving gastrectomy in our department between 2014 and 2021, the first 8 patients and the subsequent 12 patients underwent LAPPG and TLPPG, respectively. The operation time was significantly longer in the TLPPG group (median, 302 vs. 269 min). The morbidity was comparable (8.3% in TLPPG vs. 12.5% in LAPPG). Postoperative delayed gastric emptying was only observed in one patient in the LAPPG group. TLPPG reduced the cost of the operation by reducing the number of linear stapler cartridges required.
CONCLUSION: A purely hand-sewn gastrogastrostomy is safe, feasible, and cost-effective, and it omits the need for a mini-laparotomy in the upper abdomen.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early gastric cancer; End-to-end gastrogastrostomy; Hand-sewn anastomosis; Intracorporeal anastomosis; Totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35670857     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02575-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   2.895


  31 in total

1.  Laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy is better than laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for middle-third early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yun-Suhk Suh; Dong-Seok Han; Seong-Ho Kong; Sebastianus Kwon; Cheong-Il Shin; Woo-Ho Kim; Hyung-Ho Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Postoperative outcomes and complications after laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaohua Jiang; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Tetsu Fukunaga; Koshi Kumagai; Kyoko Nohara; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Assessment of postoperative quality of life following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy and Billroth-I distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: results of the nationwide postgastrectomy syndrome assessment study.

Authors:  Junya Fujita; Masazumi Takahashi; Takashi Urushihara; Kazuaki Tanabe; Yasuhiro Kodera; Takeyoshi Yumiba; Hideo Matsumoto; Akinori Takagane; Chikara Kunisaki; Koji Nakada
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  E C Smyth; M Verheij; W Allum; D Cunningham; A Cervantes; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Long-term clinical outcome and survival after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy.

Authors:  Atsushi Matsuki; Atsushi Nashimoto; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Satoru Nakagawa
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2012-09

6.  Survival benefit of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Hiki; Takeshi Sano; Tetsu Fukunaga; Shigekazu Ohyama; Masanori Tokunaga; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Oncological outcomes of function-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched cohort analysis comparing pylorus-preserving gastrectomy versus conventional distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masaki Aizawa; Michitaka Honda; Naoki Hiki; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Souya Nunobe; Hidehito Shibasaki; Atsushi Matsuki; Masahiro Watanabe; Takayuki Abe
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hitoshi Katai; Junki Mizusawa; Hiroshi Katayama; Shinji Morita; Takanobu Yamada; Etsuro Bando; Seiji Ito; Masakazu Takagi; Akinori Takagane; Shin Teshima; Keisuke Koeda; Souya Nunobe; Takaki Yoshikawa; Masanori Terashima; Mitsuru Sasako
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-11-19

9.  Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hyung-Ho Kim; Sang-Uk Han; Min-Chan Kim; Wook Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Seung Wan Ryu; Gyu Seok Cho; Chan Young Kim; Han-Kwang Yang; Do Joong Park; Kyo Young Song; Sang-Il Lee; Seong Yeob Ryu; Joo-Ho Lee; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Gastric cancer treated in 2002 in Japan: 2009 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry.

Authors:  Atsushi Nashimoto; Kohei Akazawa; Yoh Isobe; Isao Miyashiro; Hitoshi Katai; Yasuhiro Kodera; Shunichi Tsujitani; Yasuyuki Seto; Hiroshi Furukawa; Ichiro Oda; Hiroyuki Ono; Satoshi Tanabe; Michio Kaminishi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.