Literature DB >> 21358534

Postoperative outcomes and complications after laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Xiaohua Jiang1, Naoki Hiki, Souya Nunobe, Tetsu Fukunaga, Koshi Kumagai, Kyoko Nohara, Takeshi Sano, Toshiharu Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LAPPG) was introduced as a function-preserving and minimally invasive operation for early gastric cancer (EGC) in Japan. This study investigated the postoperative outcomes, complications, and associated risk factors of the procedure.
METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2009, 307 patients with EGC diagnosed before surgery underwent LAPPG. The postoperative outcomes and complications were assessed in this study. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications, and risk factors related to complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean operation time for LAPPG was 229.4 ± 47.5 minutes and estimated blood loss was 49.1 ± 62.0 mL. The mean total number of dissected lymph nodes was 31.6 ± 10.4, with nodal involvement observed in 25 patients (8.5%). The preoperative diagnostic accuracy of EGC was 93.2%. Complications developed in 53 patients (17.3%), and major complications, classified as grades greater than Clavien-Dindo classification IIIa, were observed in 4 patients (1.3%). The most frequent complication was gastric stasis, occurring in 19 patients (6.2%). Body mass index (BMI) and surgical experience of LAPPG were identified as significant risk factors of postoperative complications. Body mass index was related to severity of the complications. The patients' serum total protein and albumin did not change significantly after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy is a safe operation with excellent postoperative outcomes in terms of minimized major complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification in patients with EGC in the middle third of the stomach. To prevent postoperative complications, surgeons need to ensure an extra leaning period for LAPPG, and LAPPG should be performed cautiously in patients with high BMI. @ 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358534     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182117b24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  29 in total

1.  Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system.

Authors:  Mi Ran Jung; Young Kyu Park; Jang Won Seon; Kwang Yong Kim; Oh Cheong; Seong Yeob Ryu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Usefulness of Preoperative Assessment of Perigastric Vascular Anatomy by Dynamic Computed Tomography for Laparoscopic Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Tomohiro Osaki; Hiroaki Saito; Yuki Murakami; Kozo Miyatani; Hirohiko Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Youji Fukumoto; Masahide Ikeguchi
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.641

3.  Potentially fatal complications for elderly patients after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Koshi Kumagai; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Xiaohua Jiang; Takeshi Kubota; Susumu Aikou; Shinya Tanimura; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Minimally invasive surgery in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Yong Son; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A novel method of intracorporeal end-to-end gastrogastrostomy in laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer, including a unique anastomotic technique: piercing the stomach with a linear stapler.

Authors:  Manabu Ohashi; Naoki Hiki; Satoshi Ida; Koshi Kumagai; Souya Nunobe; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Function-preserving surgery for gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Souya Nunobe; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-25

7.  Impact of anatomical position of the pancreas on postoperative complications and drain amylase concentrations after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Koshi Kumagai; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Satoshi Kamiya; Masahiro Tsujiura; Satoshi Ida; Manabu Ohashi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Size-dependent differences in the proximal remnant stomach: how much does a small remnant stomach after subtotal gastrectomy work?

Authors:  Itaru Yasufuku; Manabu Ohashi; Kojiro Eto; Satoshi Ida; Koshi Kumagai; Souya Nunobe; Takeshi Sano; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early cancer involving the upper third: can we go higher?

Authors:  Chun-Chao Zhu; Hui Cao; Felix Berlth; Jia Xu; Shin-Hoo Park; Hwi-Nyeong Choe; Yun-Suhk Suh; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Woo-Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Postoperative intra-abdominal complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following open and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Junya Kondo; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.