Hyung-Ho Kim1, Sang-Uk Han2, Min-Chan Kim3, Wook Kim4, Hyuk-Joon Lee5, Seung Wan Ryu6, Gyu Seok Cho7, Chan Young Kim8, Han-Kwang Yang5, Do Joong Park1, Kyo Young Song9, Sang-Il Lee10, Seong Yeob Ryu11, Joo-Ho Lee12, Woo Jin Hyung13. 1. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Surgery, Yeouido St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 6. Department of Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea. 7. Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea. 8. Department of Surgery, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea. 9. Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 10. Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 11. Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. 12. Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 13. Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is gaining popularity over open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer because of better early postoperative outcomes. However, to our knowledge, no studies have proved whether laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is oncologically equivalent to open distal gastrectomy. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is noninferior to that among patients undergoing open distal gastrectomy. DESIGN: The Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) group, which includes 15 surgeons from 13 institutes, conducted a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, prospective randomized clinical trial (KLASS-01) of patients with histologically proven, preoperative clinical stage I gastric adenocarcinoma from January 5, 2006, to August 23, 2010. Survival and recurrence status of the patients was determined in December 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (n = 705) or open distal gastrectomy (n = 711). Of these patients, 85 received a surgical approach opposite the one to which they were randomized (63 randomized to the open surgery group and 22 to the laparoscopic group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Difference in 5-year overall survival between the laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy groups. The noninferiority margin was prespecified as -5% (corresponding hazard ratio of 1.54), with an assumed survival of 90% after 5 years in the open surgery group. RESULTS: Among the 1416 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.3 [11.1] years; 940 [66.4%] male) included in the study, the 5-year overall survival rates were 94.2% in the laparoscopic group and 93.3% in the open surgery group (log-rank P = .64). Intention-to-treat analysis confirmed the noninferiority of the laparoscopic approach compared with the open approach (difference, 0.9 percentage points; 1-sided 97.5% CI, -1.6 to infinity). The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were similar between the 2 groups (97.1% in the laparoscopic group and 97.2% in the open surgery group, log-rank P = .91; difference, -0.03 percentage points; 1-sided 97.5% CI, -1.8 to infinity). Per-protocol analysis results were consistent with the intention-to-treat results for overall and cancer-specific survival rates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The KLASS-01 trial revealed similar overall and cancer-specific survival rates between patients receiving laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy. Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is an oncologically safe alternative to open surgery for stage I gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00452751.
IMPORTANCE: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is gaining popularity over open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer because of better early postoperative outcomes. However, to our knowledge, no studies have proved whether laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is oncologically equivalent to open distal gastrectomy. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is noninferior to that among patients undergoing open distal gastrectomy. DESIGN: The Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) group, which includes 15 surgeons from 13 institutes, conducted a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, prospective randomized clinical trial (KLASS-01) of patients with histologically proven, preoperative clinical stage I gastric adenocarcinoma from January 5, 2006, to August 23, 2010. Survival and recurrence status of the patients was determined in December 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (n = 705) or open distal gastrectomy (n = 711). Of these patients, 85 received a surgical approach opposite the one to which they were randomized (63 randomized to the open surgery group and 22 to the laparoscopic group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Difference in 5-year overall survival between the laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy groups. The noninferiority margin was prespecified as -5% (corresponding hazard ratio of 1.54), with an assumed survival of 90% after 5 years in the open surgery group. RESULTS: Among the 1416 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.3 [11.1] years; 940 [66.4%] male) included in the study, the 5-year overall survival rates were 94.2% in the laparoscopic group and 93.3% in the open surgery group (log-rank P = .64). Intention-to-treat analysis confirmed the noninferiority of the laparoscopic approach compared with the open approach (difference, 0.9 percentage points; 1-sided 97.5% CI, -1.6 to infinity). The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were similar between the 2 groups (97.1% in the laparoscopic group and 97.2% in the open surgery group, log-rank P = .91; difference, -0.03 percentage points; 1-sided 97.5% CI, -1.8 to infinity). Per-protocol analysis results were consistent with the intention-to-treat results for overall and cancer-specific survival rates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The KLASS-01 trial revealed similar overall and cancer-specific survival rates between patients receiving laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy. Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is an oncologically safe alternative to open surgery for stage I gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00452751.
Authors: D S Y Chan; T D Reid; C White; A Willicombe; G Blackshaw; G W Clark; T J Havard; X Escofet; T D L Crosby; S A Roberts; W G Lewis Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Jillian K Smith; James T McPhee; Joshua S Hill; Giles F Whalen; Mary E Sullivan; Demetrius E Litwin; Frederick A Anderson; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2007-04
Authors: Rhami Khorfan; Cary Jo R Schlick; Anthony D Yang; David D Odell; David J Bentrem; Ryan P Merkow Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 3.452