Literature DB >> 35670788

Association of Physician Adenoma Detection Rates With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer.

Joanne E Schottinger1, Christopher D Jensen2, Nirupa R Ghai3, Jessica Chubak4, Jeffrey K Lee2, Aruna Kamineni4, Ethan A Halm5,6, Celette Sugg-Skinner6, Natalia Udaltsova2, Wei K Zhao2, Rebecca A Ziebell4, Richard Contreras7, Eric J Kim6, Bruce H Fireman2, Charles P Quesenberry2, Douglas A Corley2.   

Abstract

Importance: Although colonoscopy is frequently performed in the United States, there is limited evidence to support threshold values for physician adenoma detection rate as a quality metric. Objective: To evaluate the association between physician adenoma detection rate values and risks of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer and related deaths. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study in 3 large integrated health care systems (Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, and Kaiser Permanente Washington) with 43 endoscopy centers, 383 eligible physicians, and 735 396 patients aged 50 to 75 years who received a colonoscopy that did not detect cancer (negative colonoscopy) between January 2011 and June 2017, with patient follow-up through December 2017. Exposures: The adenoma detection rate of each patient's physician based on screening examinations in the calendar year prior to the patient's negative colonoscopy. Adenoma detection rate was defined as a continuous variable in statistical analyses and was also dichotomized as at or above vs below the median for descriptive analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome (postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer) was tumor registry-verified colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed at least 6 months after any negative colonoscopy (all indications). The secondary outcomes included death from postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.
Results: Among 735 396 patients who had 852 624 negative colonoscopies, 440 352 (51.6%) were performed on female patients, median patient age was 61.4 years (IQR, 55.5-67.2 years), median follow-up per patient was 3.25 years (IQR, 1.56-5.01 years), and there were 619 postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers and 36 related deaths during more than 2.4 million person-years of follow-up. The patients of physicians with higher adenoma detection rates had significantly lower risks for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97 per 1% absolute adenoma detection rate increase [95% CI, 0.96-0.98]) and death from postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (HR, 0.95 per 1% absolute adenoma detection rate increase [95% CI, 0.92-0.99]) across a broad range of adenoma detection rate values, with no interaction by sex (P value for interaction = .18). Compared with adenoma detection rates below the median of 28.3%, detection rates at or above the median were significantly associated with a lower risk of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (1.79 vs 3.10 cases per 10 000 person-years; absolute difference in 7-year risk, -12.2 per 10 000 negative colonoscopies [95% CI, -10.3 to -13.4]; HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52-0.73]) and related deaths (0.05 vs 0.22 cases per 10 000 person-years; absolute difference in 7-year risk, -1.2 per 10 000 negative colonoscopies [95%, CI, -0.80 to -1.69]; HR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.11-0.65]). Conclusions and Relevance: Within 3 large community-based settings, colonoscopies by physicians with higher adenoma detection rates were significantly associated with lower risks of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer across a broad range of adenoma detection rate values. These findings may help inform recommended targets for colonoscopy quality measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35670788      PMCID: PMC9175074          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.6644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   157.335


  27 in total

Review 1.  Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event.

Authors:  D G Altman; P K Andersen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-12-04

2.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Karina W Davidson; John W Epling; Francisco A R García; Matthew W Gillman; Diane M Harper; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Douglas K Owens; William R Phillips; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone; Albert L Siu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Jaroslaw Regula; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Maria Zwierko; Maciej Rupinski; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Robert L Barclay; Joseph J Vicari; Andrea S Doughty; John F Johanson; Roger L Greenlaw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium.

Authors:  Jasmin A Tiro; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Yingye Zheng; Joanne S Schottinger; Carolyn M Rutter; Douglas A Corley; Celette S Skinner; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta; Karen J Wernli; Carrie Klabunde
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Jeffrey K Lee; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jolanda de Boer; Bruce H Fireman; Joanne E Schottinger; Virginia P Quinn; Nirupa R Ghai; Theodore R Levin; Charles P Quesenberry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Diagnosis and predictors of sessile serrated adenoma after educational training in a large, community-based, integrated healthcare setting.

Authors:  Dan Li; John Woolfrey; Sheng-Fang Jiang; Christopher D Jensen; Wei K Zhao; Sanjay Kakar; Monica Santamaria; Greg Rumore; Mary Anne Armstrong; Debbie Postlethwaite; Douglas A Corley; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  World Endoscopy Organization Consensus Statements on Post-Colonoscopy and Post-Imaging Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Iosif Beintaris; Roland Valori; Han Mo Chiu; Douglas A Corley; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Evelien Dekker; Anna Forsberg; Jola Gore-Booth; Ulrike Haug; Michal F Kaminski; Takahisa Matsuda; Gerrit A Meijer; Eva Morris; Andrew A Plumb; Linda Rabeneck; Douglas J Robertson; Robert E Schoen; Harminder Singh; Jill Tinmouth; Graeme P Young; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Prevalence of 'one and done' in adenoma detection rates: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

Authors:  Stacey A Fedewa; Joseph C Anderson; Christina M Robinson; Julie E Weiss; Robert A Smith; Rebecca L Siegel; Ahmedin Jemal; Lynn F Butterly
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.