| Literature DB >> 35666064 |
Xiaochen Lyu1,2, Thitinut Akkadechanunt2, Pratum Soivong2, Phanida Juntasopeepun2, Ratanawadee Chontawan2.
Abstract
AIM: This qualitative systematic review was conducted to describe the lived experience of men in nursing.Entities:
Keywords: lived experience; male nurses; men in nursing; qualitative research; systematic review
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35666064 PMCID: PMC9374391 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nurs Open ISSN: 2054-1058
Review inclusion and exclusion criteria
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
|
Papers are written in English between January 2000 and February 2021. Papers focussed on:
Adopted a qualitative methodology. Explored the lived experience of male nurses. Included participants who had at least 1‐year experience in clinical nursing. Papers were full peer‐reviewed studies. |
Papers not written in English. Papers were quantitative studies. The research participants were male nursing students and novice male nurses with less than 1 year of clinical experience. |
FIGURE 1PRISMA flow diagram
Quality assessment
| Protocol statement | CASP questions | Paper, author (data) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rowlinson ( | Achora ( | Blair ( | Frimpong ( | Saleh et al. ( | Smith et al. ( | ||
| Adopted an appropriate method and design to meet the aims of the study | Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Is a qualitative methodology appropriate? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Used a suitable data collection strategy | Was the recruitment strategy appropriate for the aims of the research? | Not known | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered? | Not known | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Included pertinent methods of data analysis | Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Drew conclusions and interpretations that reflected the findings of the study | Is there a clear statement of findings? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| How valuable is the research? | Valuable | Valuable | Valuable | Valuable | Valuable | Valuable | |
| Obtained ethical approval | Have ethical issues been taken into consideration? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Bibliography of included studies
| Author, year, origin | Aim of study | Study design | Data collection and analysis | Sampling ( | Demographic details | Main findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rowlinson ( United Kingdom | To explore the lived experience of nursing from both male and female perspectives | Qualitative, hermeneutic phenomenological approach | Semi‐structured interviews, 1 hr. Interpretative phenomenological approach | Purposive (1) | Participant working in clinical practice and was in his late 20s and had been qualified for more than 6 years |
Intersubjectivity Career versus vocation Gender stereotyping |
|
Achora ( Uganda | To explore and describe the lived experiences of male nurses in a Ugandan hospital | Qualitative, descriptive | Interviews, 60 min, guided phenomenological reflection, Colaizzi's phenomenological approach | Purposive (11) | Participants' ages ranged from 27 to 42 years with nursing experience of 4 to 11 years |
Being appreciated as expressing unique nursing care Being misunderstood as practitioners of other disciplines Being maltreated by colleagues of the profession and other healthcare workers |
|
Blair ( United States | To explore and elucidate the everyday lived experience of male registered nurses in the workforce | Qualitative, hermeneutic (interpretive‐descriptive) phenomenological approach | Semi‐structured interviews, 60 min, Qualitative content analysis | Purposive (17) | Participants ages ranged from 30 to 65 years with nursing experience of 2 to 40 years |
Motivating factors (job opportunities, job flexibility, financial stability) Breaking gender barriers (moving beyond gender barriers, making a difference, caring for female patients) Gendering (preferential privileges, maintaining masculinity) |
|
Frimpong ( United States | To explore the lived professional experiences of male nurses and understand the factors which impacted the professional experiences of male nurses | Qualitative, phenomenological lifeworld | In‐depth interviews (60 min), focus group (90 min), and participants' diaries, Inductive approach and narrative analysis | Purposive (10) | Participants ages ranged from 38 to 54 years with nursing experience of 4 to 13 years |
Separateness Discrimination Job security and benefits Career opportunities Gender‐based stereotypes Caring through spirituality Glass (d) escalator |
| Saleh et al. ( | To explore the Jordanian male nurses' experiences of their careers in their Arabic community | Qualitative, hermeneutic phenomenological methodology | Focus group, 75–90 min, Van Manen's hermeneutic approach and Phenomenology of Practice | Purposive (22) | Participants ranged in age from 27 to 45, with 5 to 15 years of experience |
Personal gains (privileged to ease patient's suffering; privileged to fulfil our spiritual needs; job security and economic stability) Masculinity (stereotype characteristics; endurance) Cultural influences (positive aspects of social milieu; Negative aspects of social milieu) |
|
Smith et al. ( United States | To investigate the lived experiences of male nurses in today's healthcare environment to understand the persistently low numbers of men in nursing | Qualitative, interpretive description methodology | Semi‐structured interviews: Group interview, 60–180 min; Individual interviews, 50–90 min, Inductive approach and discourse and narrative analysis | Purposive (11) | Participants ages ranged from 30 to 64 years with nursing experience of 2 to 41 years |
Role expectations (societal views, professional acceptance, patient/family feelings) Workplace relations (being male in a female environment, social cliques and peer support) |
Presence of themes in each paper
| Theme | Category | Rowlinson ( | Achora ( | Blair ( | Frimpong ( | Saleh et al. ( | Smith et al. ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Meaningful to patients |
Easing patients' suffering Patient‐centred | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Fulfils spiritual needs |
Higher‐level communication with patients Caring through spirituality | √ | √ | ||||
|
| √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Gender disadvantages |
Discrimination Separateness Being maltreated Being misunderstood | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Gender advantages |
Endurance Preferential treatment Glass escalator Easy to stand out | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
|
| √ | √ | √ | ||||
|
Being accepted by patients | √ | √ | √ | ||||
|
Being accepted by female peers | √ | √ | |||||
|
| √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
|
Career opportunities | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
|
Financial stability | √ | √ | √ | ||||
|
Job flexibility | √ | √ | |||||
|
| √ | √ | √ | ||||
| Creating a role model of men in nursing |
Making a difference Moving beyond barriers | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Adapting to a women‐dominated clinical setting |
Being male in a female environment Caring for female patients | √ | √ |