| Literature DB >> 35663742 |
Aisha Gambo1, Nceba Gqaleni2, Tesleem K Babalola3.
Abstract
Background: To maintain an optimal nutritional status and immunological function in PLHIV, a diet with adequate nutrients is of utmost importance. This is a major challenge among poor populations in developing worlds like Nigeria, where malnutrition and food insecurity are endemic. This study aimed to assess the type of regular diet consumed and assess the impact of supplementation of the diet with Moringa oleifera Lam. leaves on the nutritional status and CD4 cell counts of PLHIV that are on ART in Nigeria. Method: A double-blind, randomized trial was conducted. Two hundred consented patients were randomly allocated to either the Moringa oleifera Lam. group (MOG) or the control group (COG). The FAO individual dietary diversity questionnaire was used. The regular diets of participants at baseline and six months were monitored. The measurements of weight, BMI, MUAC, and CD4 cell counts were obtained from baseline to six months of Moringa oleifera Lam. leaves supplementation.Entities:
Keywords: Antiretroviral therapy; Dietary diversity; HIV; Immune response; Moringa oleifera Lam; Nutritional status
Year: 2022 PMID: 35663742 PMCID: PMC9156884 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Flow Chart of participants.
Nutrient composition of Moringa oleifera Lam. leaf powder.
| Nutrient | 100 g | 15 g |
|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal) | 981 | 147.15 |
| Protein (g) | 28.2 | 4.23 |
| Fat (g) | 3.9 | 0.59 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 22 | 3.3 |
| Calcium (mg) | 1791.82 | 268.77 |
| Potassium (mg) | 4879.26 | 731.89 |
| Sodium (mg) | 24 | 3.6 |
| Zinc (mg) | 2.88 | 0.43 |
| Iron (mg) | 37.78 | 5.67 |
Demographic description of study participants.
| Variables | MOG (%) (N = 89) | COG (%) (N = 88) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Males | 19 (21.3) | 21 (23.9) | 0.689 |
| Female | 70 (78.7) | 67 (76.1) | |
| <20 | 3 (3.4) | 1 (1.1) | 0.737 |
| 20–29 | 24 (27.0) | 21 (23.9) | |
| 30–39 | 37 (41.6) | 36 (40.9) | |
| 40–49 | 20 (22.5) | 22 (25.0) | |
| 50–60 | 5 (5.6) | 8 (9.1) | |
| Married | 42 (47.2) | 38 (43.2) | 0.838 |
| Single | 12 (13.5) | 10 (11.4) | |
| Divorced | 19 (21.3) | 20 (22.7) | |
| Widowed | 16 (18.0) | 20 (22.7) | |
| Islam | 64 (71.9) | 66 (75.0) | 0.642 |
| Christianity | 25 (28.1) | 22 (25.0) | |
| Hausa/Fulani | 55 (61.8) | 47 (53.4) | 0.511 |
| Yoruba | 13 (14.6) | 15 (17.0) | |
| Igbo | 9 (10.1) | 15 (17.0) | |
| Others | 12 (13.5) | 11 (12.5) | |
| Primary | 14 (15.7) | 12 (13.6) | 0.971 |
| Secondary | 27 (30.3) | 24 (27.3) | |
| Tertiary | 20 (22.5) | 21 (23.9) | |
| Quranic | 13 (14.6) | 15 (17.0) | |
| None | 15 (16.9) | 16 (18.2) | |
| Entrepreneur | 15 (16.9) | 10 (11.4) | 0.840 |
| Trader | 23 (25.8) | 25 (28.4) | |
| Civil Servant | 15 (16.9) | 17 (19.3) | |
| Artisan | 19 (21.3) | 17 (19.3) | |
| Unemployed | 17 (19.1) | 19 (21.6) | |
| 2–5 | 38 (42.7) | 32 (36.4) | 0.557 |
| 6–10 | 26 (29.2) | 25 (28.4) | |
| >10 | 25 (28.1) | 31 (35.2) | |
| Not Indicated | 11 (12.4) | 6 (6.8) | 0.672 |
| <30,000 | 67 (75.3) | 66 (75.0) | |
| 30,001–60,000 | 6 (6.7) | 10 (11.4) | |
| 60,001–90,000 | 1 (1.1) | 1 (1.1) | |
| 90,001–120,000 | 3 (3.4) | 2 (2.3) | |
| >120,000 | 1 (1.1) | 3 (3.4) | |
Statistical test = Chi-square test; absolute frequency and percentage in parentheses.
Comparison of food groups consumed and dietary diversity tercile at baseline and 6th month between MOG and COG.
| Food group | Baseline | 6th month | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOG n. (%) | COG n. (%) | P value | Odds ratio (OR) | OR 95%CI | MOG n. (%) | COG n. (%) | P value | Odds ratio (OR) | OR 95%CI | |||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||||||
| Cereals | 85 (95.5) | 80 (90.9) | 0.249 | 0.471 | 0.101 | 1.691 | 73 (82.0) | 82 (93.2) | 0.024 | 2.995 | 1.181 | 9.748 |
| Roots & tubers | 16 (16.9) | 21 (23.9) | 0.392 | 1.546 | 0.537 | 3.836 | 16 (17.9) | 26 (29.5) | 0.045 | 2.069 | 1.007 | 4.248 |
| Dark green vegetable | 62 (69.7) | 53 (60.2) | 0.188 | 0.659 | 0.357 | 1.239 | 60 (67.4) | 48 (54.5) | 0.079 | 0.580 | 0.315 | 1.068 |
| Other vegetables | 47 (52.8) | 61 (69.3) | 0.024 | 2.019 | 1.103 | 4.211 | 50 (56.2) | 54 (61.4) | 0.484 | 1.239 | 0.661 | 2.357 |
| Fruits | 7 (7.8) | 7 (8.0) | 0.782 | 1.195 | 0.321 | 4.410 | 22 (24.7) | 16 (18.2) | 0.290 | 0.677 | 0.319 | 1.380 |
| Meat, poultry & organs | 23 (25.8) | 19 (21.6) | 0.722 | 0.839 | 0.417 | 1.745 | 22 (24.7) | 27 (30.7) | 0.375 | 1.348 | 0.718 | 2.568 |
| Eggs | 6 (6.7) | 5 (5.7) | 0.770 | 0.833 | 0.180 | 3.090 | 5 (5.6) | 2 (2.3) | 0.254 | 0.391 | 0.105 | 1.912 |
| Fish | 10 (11.2) | 12 (13.6) | 0.656 | 1.247 | 0.468 | 3.468 | 11 (12.4) | 16 (18.2) | 0.281 | 1.576 | 0.648 | 4.187 |
| Legumes, nuts & seeds | 40 (44.9) | 16 (18.2) | 0.001 | 0.272 | 0.122 | 0.552 | 17 (19.1) | 18 (20.5) | 0.821 | 1.089 | 0.512 | 2.346 |
| Milk & milk products | 13 (14.6) | 13 (14.8) | 0.975 | 1.013 | 0.383 | 2.318 | 13 (14.6) | 14 (15.9) | 0.810 | 1.106 | 0.463 | 2.568 |
| Oil, fats & palm oil | 71 (79.7) | 78 (88.6) | 0.069 | 2.065 | 0.935 | 4.504 | 86 (96.6) | 85 (96.6) | 0.719 | 0.781 | 0.152 | 4.019 |
| Sugar & honey | 11 (12.4) | 9 (10.2) | 0.813 | 0.808 | 0.284 | 2.368 | 19 (21.3) | 12 (13.6) | 0.177 | 0.582 | 0.248 | 1.342 |
| Spices & condiments | 80 (89.9) | 75 (85.2) | 0.372 | 0.649 | 0.220 | 1.656 | 80 (89.9) | 73 (83.0) | 0.178 | 0.548 | 0.166 | 1.438 |
| Low (1–4) | 33 (37.1) | 40 (45.5) | 0.258 | 1.414 | 0.776 | 2.679 | 39 (43.8) | 41 (46.6) | 0.711 | 1.118 | 0.593 | 2.096 |
| Medium (5–9) | 55 (61.8) | 47 (53.4) | 0.289 | 0.709 | 0.384 | 1.269 | 49 (55.1) | 47 (53.4) | 0.826 | 0.936 | 0.504 | 1.776 |
| High (>10) | 1 (1.1) | 1 (1.1) | 0.994 | 1.011 | 0.272 | 3.488 | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0.319 | 0.989 | 0.959 | 0.990 |
= significant at 95CI (Chi-square test; Fishers exact test & Odd ratio).
Comparison of participants’ mean, the standard deviation of anthropometric parameters (nutritional status), and CD4 of MOG and COG at baseline and 6th month.
| Month | MOG | COG | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| 0 | 63.8 (14.8) | 61.9 (12.5) | P = 0.361 |
| 6 | 64.71 (15.07) | 63.16 (13.49) | P = 0.472 |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| 0 | 24.84 (4.8) | 23.75 (3.82) | P = 0.093 |
| 6 | 25.16 (4.93) | 24.19 (4.09) | P = 0.157 |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| 0 | 26.3 (2.1) | 25.9 (1.8) | P = 0.145 |
| 6 | 26.50 (2.16) | 26.08 (1.95) | P = 0.185 |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| 0 | 341.8 (106.1) | 352.34 (126.0) | P = 0.547 |
| 6 | 425.75 (153.76) | 373.44 (157.31) | P = 0.03 |
= significant at 95CI (independent sample t-test).
Comparison of participants’ nutritional status (using categorized BMI) at baseline and 6th month between MOG and COG.
| BMI Category | Baseline | 6th month | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOG n. (%) | Mean [±SD] (Kg/m2) | COG n. (%) | Mean [±SD] (Kg/m2) | P value | MOG n. (%) | Mean [±SD] (Kg/m2) | COG n. (%) | Mean [±SD] (Kg/m2) | P value | |
| Underweight (<18.5) | 5 (5.6) | 17.73 [0.55] | 5 (5.7) | 17.26 [0.93] | 0.357 | 5 (5.6) | 17.19 [1.00] | 7 (8.0) | 17.48 [0.68] | 0.549 |
| Normal Weight (18.5–24.9) | 46 (51.7) | 21.87 [2.00] | 51 (58.0) | 21.77 [1.78] | 0.781 | 41 (46.1) | 21.82 [1.66] | 46 (52.3) | 21.99 [1.47] | 0.600 |
| Overweight (25.0–29.9) | 27 (30.3) | 27.63 [1.41] | 28 (31.8) | 27.40 [1.56] | 0.576 | 29 (32.6) | 27.35 [1.54] | 27 (30.7) | 27.41 [1.31] | 0.872 |
| Obese (≥30.0) | 11 (12.4) | 33.67 [2.32] | 4 (4.5) | 31.53 [2.13] | 0.130 | 14 (15.7) | 33.27 [3.01] | 8 (9.1) | 31.84 [2.05] | 0.248 |
| Overall Total | 89 (100.0) | 24.84 [±4.78] | 88 (100.0) | 23.75 [±3.82] | 0.093 | 89 (100.0) | 25.16 [±4.93] | 88 (100.0) | 24.19 [±4.09] | 0.157 |
Statistical test = Independence sample t-test; SD = standard deviation.
Linear mixed-effects model showing the differences in nutritional status and CD4 cell counts between MOG and COG over the study period.
| Estimates of Fixed Effectsa | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Estimate | Std. Error | t | P value | Estimate 95% CI | ||
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||
| Intercept | 61.92 | 1.47 | 42.02 | 0.0001 | 61.43 | 63.65 | |
| [Group = 1 (MOG)] | -0.05 | 0.08 | -0.59 | 0.5556 | -0.20 | -0.11 | |
| [Group = 2 (COG)] | 0b | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Intercept | 23.73 | 0.47 | 50.98 | 0.0001 | 23.61 | 24.32 | |
| [Group = 1 (MOG)] | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.65 | 0.5145 | -0.08 | -0.04 | |
| [Group = 2 (COG)] | 0b | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Intercept | 25.14 | .68 | 69.56 | 0.0001 | 22.94 | 23.52 | |
| [Group = 1(MOG)] | -0.04 | 0.06 | -0.73 | 0.6456 | -0.09 | -0.02 | |
| [Group = 2 (COG)] | 0b | 0 | . | . | . | . | |
| Intercept | 356.35 | 13.10 | 27.20 | 0.0001 | 354.29 | 376.09 | |
| [Group = 1(MOG)] | 10.33 | 2.65 | 3.89 | 0.0001 | 5.12 | 15.54 | |
| [Group = 2 (COG)] | 0b | 0 | |||||
= statistically significant;a = Dependent variable (weight, BMI, MUAC, CD4);b = parameter set to zero (redundant); Statistical test = linear mixed effect model.