| Literature DB >> 29763418 |
Rocio Martín-Cañavate1, Michela Sonego2,3, Maria Jose Sagrado1,4, Gustavo Escobar5, Estefanie Rivas5, Sandra Ayala5, Luis Castaneda5, Pilar Aparicio1, Estefania Custodio1,6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to assess the nutritional status, the dietary patterns and its associated factors in the HIV-infected population of children and adolescents on antiretroviral treatment at the El Salvador reference center for pediatric HIV care (CENID).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29763418 PMCID: PMC5953455 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic, socioeconomic and clinical characteristics of the HIV-infected children attending at CENID, El Salvador in 2011 (N = 307).
| Variables | Categories | N | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total children | 307 | 100.0 | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 161 | 52.4 | |
| Female | 146 | 47.6 | |
| Age | |||
| <12 years | 216 | 70.4 | |
| >12 years | 91 | 29.6 | |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Institution | 34 | 11.1 | |
| Medium-Low | 43 | 14.0 | |
| Poverty | 143 | 46.6 | |
| Extreme poverty | 87 | 28.3 | |
| Residence | |||
| Urban | 215 | 70.0 | |
| Rural | 92 | 30.0 | |
| Viral load | |||
| <50 (copies/mL) | 226 | 73.6 | |
| >50 (copies/mL) | 81 | 26.4 | |
| Time of treatment | |||
| <5years | 138 | 45.9 | |
| >5 years | 163 | 54.2 |
Prevalence of nutritional indicators by sex and age (N = 307).
| Stunted | Wasted | Overweighted/Obese | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 37.3 (30.1–45.0) | 3.7 (1.7–8.1) | 11.2 (7.1–17.1) |
| Female | 28.8 (22.0–36.7) | 2.7 (1.0–7.1) | 8.9 (5.2–14.8) |
| p-value | 0.114 | 0.627 | 0.509 |
| <12 years | 26.9 (21.3–33.2) | 1.4 (0.5–4.3) | 12.0 (8.3–17.1) |
| >12 years | 48.4 (38.2–58.6) | 7.7 (3.7–15.4) | 5.5 (2.3–12.6) |
| p-value | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.082 |
| 33.2 (28.2–38.7) | 3.3 (1.8–6.0) | 10.1 (7.2–14.0) |
Factor loadings for food groups in varimax rotated principal components.
| Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalue | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| % Variance explained | 21.1 | 15.0 | 13.4 |
| Group 1 Cereals | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Group 2 Legumes | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Group 3 Fruits | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Group 4 Vegetables | 0.8 | 0.0 | -0.1 |
| Group 5 Dairy | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Group 6 Eggs | -0.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Group 7 Meat/Fish | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Group 8 Oils/Fats | 0.1 | 0.6 | -0.1 |
| Group 9 Miscellaneous | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
¶ Factor 1 = "healthy diet" Factor 2 = "hig fat/sugar diet" Factor 3 = low dietary diversity diet
* Food grous with factor loadings |>0.2|
Fig 1Percentage of children consuming each food group three or more times a week, by dietary pattern.
Multivariate model result for each of the dietary pattern of the HIV-infected children attending at CENID, El Salvador in 2011.
| Pattern 1 "Healthy diet" | Pattern 2 "High fat/sugar diet" | Pattern 3 "Low diversity diet" | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Categories | AOR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) |
| Sex | Male | ref | ref | ref |
| Female | 1.63 (0.97, 2.75) | 1.14 (0.69, 1.90) | 0.85 (0.52, 1.41) | |
| 0.067 | 0.602 | 0.546 | ||
| Age group | >12 years | ref | ref | ref |
| <12 years | 2.37 (1.28, 4.36) | 0.62 (0.36, 1.08) | 0.83 (0.49, 1.42) | |
| 0.006 | 0.092 | 0.501 | ||
| Socioeconomic status | Extreme poverty | ref | ref | ref |
| Poverty | 2.29 (1.17, 4.46) | 1.36 (0.77, 2.39) | 1.02 (0.58, 1.78) | |
| Institution | 14.5 (5.35, 39.5) | - | 0.11 (0.02, 0.48) | |
| Medium-low | 2.65 (1.12, 6.28) | 0.57 (0.24, 1.33) | 0.81 (0.37, 1.78) | |
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.004 | ||
| Residence | Urban | ref | ref | ref |
| Rural | 0.99 (0.55, 1.81) | 1.15 (0.66, 1.98) | 0.97 (0.57, 1.69) | |
| 0.997 | 0.628 | 0.94 |
†Adjusted Odds Ratios result of the multivariable logistic regression model including all covariates described in the tabe.