| Literature DB >> 35663044 |
Xueling Liao1,2, Yanan Xiao3,4, Ulf Elbelt3,4, Karsten H Weylandt3,5, Kanghui Li2, Jie Deng2, Ning Zeng2, Chao Xue1.
Abstract
Objective: We investigated the relationships between interleukin- (IL-) 1β and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) gene polymorphism and plasma levels in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35663044 PMCID: PMC9159863 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9661823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Baseline characteristics.
| Parameter | DN | HC |
|---|---|---|
| Cases | 61 | 48 |
| Gender (M/F) | 34/27 | 23/25 |
| Age (years) | 61.39 ± 11.25 | 57.93 ± 9.84 |
| Height (cm) | 165.57 ± 12.61 | 166.91 ± 28.39 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.98 ± 5.00 | 23.88 ± 2.15 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 146.15 ± 22.82 | 128.73 ± 17.15 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 87.41 ± 14.51 | 75.16 ± 10.43 |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.83 ± 2.51∗ | 5.56 ± 0.46 |
| UAER (mg/24 h) | 2065.71 ± 2269.48 | — |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 8.48 ± 6.51∗ | 4.56 ± 1.09 |
| Cr ( | 177.13 ± 215.45∗ | 70.81 ± 17.11 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.36 ± 2.11∗ | 1.69 ± 0.86 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.32 ± 1.36 | 5.10 ± 1.00 |
BMI: body mass index; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; UAER: urinary albumin excretion rate; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; Cr: creatinine; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol. Statistical evaluation: t-test; ∗P < 0.05 versus the HC group.
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test for the genotype distributions of IL-1β (-511C/T), IL-1β (+3953C/T), and IL-1Ra (+8006C/T) in the DN and HC groups.
| Genotype | Group |
| Genotype (%) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | TC | CC | |||||
| IL-1 | DN | Measured | 61 | 46 (75.4) | 11 (18.0) | 4 (6.6) |
|
| Theoretical | 44 (71.0) | 16 (25.8) | 2 (3.2) |
| |||
| HC | Measured | 48 | 22 (45.8) | 19 (39.6) | 7 (14.6) |
| |
| Theoretical | 21 (42.9) | 22 (44.9) | 6 (12.2) |
| |||
| IL-1 | DN | Measured | 61 | 16 (26.2) | 24 (39.3) | 21 (34.4) |
|
| Theoretical | 13 (21.3) | 30 (49.2) | 18 (29.5) |
| |||
| HC | Measured | 48 | 16 (33.3) | 12 (25.0) | 20 (41.7) |
| |
| Theoretical | 10 (20.8) | 24 (50.0) | 14 (29.2) |
| |||
| IL-1Ra (+8006C/T) | DN | Measured | 61 | 1 (1.6) | 10 (16.4) | 50 (82.0) |
|
| Theoretical | 1 (1.6) | 11 (17.7) | 50 (80.6) |
| |||
| HC | Measured | 48 | 1 (2.1) | 8 (16.7) | 39 (81.2) |
| |
| Theoretical | 1 (2.0) | 9 (18.4) | 39 (79.6) |
| |||
The genotype and allele frequencies of IL-1β (-511C/T), IL-1β (+3953C/T), and IL-1Ra (+8006C/T) in the DN and HC groups (% of total).
| Genotype or allele | DN | HC |
|
| OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||||
| IL-1 | |||||
| TT | 46 (75.4) | 22 (45.8) | 10.014 | 0.01∗ | 3.66 (0.968~13.827) |
| TC | 11 (18.0) | 19 (39.6) | 1.01 (0.683~1.473) | ||
| CC | 4 (6.6) | 7 (14.6) | 1.00 | ||
| T | 103 (84.4) | 63 (65.6) | 10.465 | <0.01∗∗ | 2.84 (1.489~5.416) |
| C | 19 (15.6) | 33 (34.4) | 1.00 | ||
| IL-1 | |||||
| TT | 16 (26.2) | 16 (33.3) | 2.510 | 0.29 | 0.95 (0.378~2.401) |
| TC | 24 (39.3) | 12 (25.0) | 1.91 (0.755~4.802) | ||
| CC | 21 (34.4) | 20 (41.7) | 1.00 | ||
| T | 56 (45.9) | 44 (45.8) | 0.000 | 0.99 | 1.00 (0.586~1.715) |
| C | 66 (54.1) | 52 (54.2) | 1.00 | ||
| IL-1Ra (+8006) | |||||
| TT | 1 (1.6) | 1 (2.1) | 0.318 | 1.00 | 0.78 (0.047~12.869) |
| TC | 10 (16.4) | 8 (16.7) | 0.98 (0.352~2.703) | ||
| CC | 50 (82.0) | 39 (81.2) | 1.00 | ||
| T | 12 (9.8) | 10 (10.4) | 0.020 | 0.89 | 0.94 (0.387~2.274) |
| C | 110 (90.2) | 86 (89.6) | 1.00 |
∗ indicates P < 0.05; ∗∗ indicates P < 0.01.
Figure 1Plasma concentrations of IL-1β (a) and IL-1Ra (b) in the DN and HC groups. Data are given as mean ± SEM. Statistical evaluation: t-test; ∗ indicates P < 0.05; ∗∗ indicates P < 0.01.
Figure 2Comparison of plasma IL-1β and IL-1Ra levels. (a) IL-1β concentration in DN and HCs with different genotypes of IL-1β (-511C/T). (b) IL-1β concentrations in DN group with different genotypes of IL-1β (-511C/T). (c) IL-1Ra concentration in DN and HCs with different genotypes of IL-1β (-511C/T). (d) IL-1Ra concentration in DN group with different genotypes of IL-1β (-511C/T). Data are given as mean ± SEM. Statistical evaluation: ANOVA analysis; ∗ indicates P < 0.05; ∗∗ indicates P < 0.01.