Literature DB >> 35656120

Control of Variance and Bias in CT Image Processing with Variational Training of Deep Neural Networks.

Matthew Tivnan1, Wenying Wang1, Grace Gang1, Peter Noël2, J Webster Stayman1.   

Abstract

Optimization of CT image quality typically involves balancing noise and bias. In filtered back-projection, this trade-off is controlled by the particular filter and cutoff frequency. In penalized-likelihood iterative reconstruction, the penalty weight serves the same function. Deep neural networks typically do not provide this tuneable control over output image properties. Models are often trained to minimize mean squared error which penalizes both variance and bias in image outputs but does not offer any control over the trade-off between the two. In this work, we propose a method for controlling the output image properties of neural networks with a new loss function called weighted covariance and bias (WCB). Our proposed method includes separate weighting parameters to control the relative importance of noise or bias reduction. Moreover, we show that tuning these weights enables targeted penalization of specific image features (e.g. spatial frequencies). To evaluate our method, we present a simulation study using digital anthropormorphic phantoms, physical simulation of non-ideal CT data, and image formation with various algorithms. We show that WCB offers a greater degree of control over trade-offs between variance and bias whereas MSE has only one configuration. We also show that WCB can be used to control specific image properties including variance, bias, spatial resolution, and the noise correlation of neural network outputs. Finally, we present a method to optimize the proposed weights for stimulus detectability. Our results demonstrate the potential for this new capability to control the image properties of DNN outputs and optimize image quality for the task-specific applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35656120      PMCID: PMC9157378          DOI: 10.1117/12.2612417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  6 in total

1.  Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Emil Y Sidky; Michael Vannier
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.407

2.  Task-Driven Optimization of Fluence Field and Regularization for Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Grace J Gang; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research.

Authors:  W P Segars; G Sturgeon; S Mendonca; Jason Grimes; B M W Tsui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for flat-panel cone-beam CT with focal spot blur, detector blur, and correlated noise.

Authors:  Steven Tilley; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A Simple Low-dose X-ray CT Simulation from High-dose Scan.

Authors:  Dong Zeng; Jing Huang; Zhaoying Bian; Shanzhou Niu; Hua Zhang; Qianjin Feng; Zhengrong Liang; Jianhua Ma
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.679

6.  A review on Deep Learning approaches for low-dose Computed Tomography restoration.

Authors:  K A Saneera Hemantha Kulathilake; Nor Aniza Abdullah; Aznul Qalid Md Sabri; Khin Wee Lai
Journal:  Complex Intell Systems       Date:  2021-05-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.