| Literature DB >> 35655107 |
Vera Schwierzeck1,2,3, Renate Effner4,5, Felicitas Abel4,5,6, Matthias Reiger5,7, Gundula Notheis4,5,6, Jürgen Held8, Valeska Simon9, Sebastian Dintner10, Reinhard Hoffmann9, Beate Hagl4,5,6, Johannes Huebner6, Alexander Mellmann4, Ellen D Renner4,5,11.
Abstract
Hyper-IgE syndromes (HIES) are a group of inborn errors of immunity (IEI) caused by monogenic defects such as in the gene STAT3 (STAT3-HIES). Patients suffering from HIES show an increased susceptibility to Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) including skin abscesses and pulmonary infections. To assess if the underlying immune defect of STAT3-HIES patients influences the resistance patterns, pathogenicity factors or strain types of S. aureus. We characterized eleven S. aureus strains isolated from STAT3-HIES patients (n = 4) by whole genome sequencing (WGS) to determine presence of resistance and virulence genes. Additionally, we used multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and protein A (spa) typing to classify these isolates. Bacterial isolates collected from this cohort of STAT3-HIES patients were identified as common spa types in Germany. Only one of the isolates was classified as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). For one STAT3 patient WGS illustrated that infection and colonization occurred with different S. aureus isolates rather than one particular clone. The identified S. aureus carriage profile on a molecular level suggests that S. aureus strain type in STAT3-HIES patients is determined by local epidemiology rather than the underlying immune defect highlighting the importance of microbiological assessment prior to antibiotic treatment.Entities:
Keywords: STAT3 hyper-IgE syndromes (STAT3-HIES); Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus); immune evasion cluster (IEC); protein A (spa) typing; whole genome sequencing (WGS)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35655107 PMCID: PMC9537231 DOI: 10.1007/s10875-022-01293-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Immunol ISSN: 0271-9142 Impact factor: 8.542
Demographic and clinical information of STAT3-HIES patients
| STAT3-HIES | STAT3-HIES | STAT3-HIES | STAT3-HIES | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 9 years of age | 29 years of age | 53 years of age | 5 years of age |
| Mutation | c.1144C > T p.R382W | c.1145C > A p.R382Q | c.1144C > T p.R382W | c.1825A > G p.R609G |
| History of skin abscesses/eczema | + | + | + | + |
| History of recurrent respiratory infections | − | + | + | + |
| Antibiotic prophylaxis | Co-Trimoxazole Cephalexin | Co-Trimoxazole | − | Co-Trimoxazole |
Typing results of S. aureus isolates collected from STAT3-HIES patients
| Patient | Sample | MLST ST | CC | Collection site | Collection date | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | P1.1 | 5 | 5 | t179 | + | − | Nose/throat, screening swab | 2011 |
| P1.2 | 7 | - | t091 | − | − | Lymph node abscess | 2019 | |
| P1.3 | 5 | 5 | t179 | − | − | Nose/throat, screening swab | 2019 | |
| P1.4 | 5 | 5 | t179 | − | − | Perianal screening swab | 2019 | |
| P2 | P2.1 | 97 | 97 | t521 | − | − | Nose/throat, screening swab | 2012 |
| P3 | P3.1 | 582 | 15 | t084 | − | − | Skin lesion (left eyebrow) | 2011 |
| P3.2 | 582 | 15 | t084 | − | − | Skin lesion (left arm) | 2011 | |
| P3.3 | 582 | 15 | t084 | − | − | Skin lesion (left ear) | 2011 | |
| P3.4 | 582 | 15 | t084 | − | − | Skin lesion (nose) | 2011 | |
| P3.5 | 582 | 15 | t084 | − | − | Skin lesion (right ear) | 2011 | |
| P4 | P4.1 | 45 | 45 | t015 | − | − | Nose/throat, screening swab | 2019 |
Toxin and virulence genes in S. aureus isolates
| P1.1 | P1.2 | P1.3 | P1.4 | P2 | P3.1 | P3.2 | P3.3 | P3.4 | P3.5 | P4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemolysin α ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Hemolysin β ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Hemolysin δ ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| Hemolysin ( | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| γ hemolysin component A ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| γ hemolysin component B ( | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| γ hemolysin component C ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Hemolysin ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Transcriptional regulator ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Enterotoxin A ( | + | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Chemotaxis inhibitoy protein ( | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | + |
| Staphylococcal complement inhibitor ( | + | + | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + | + |
| Staphylokinase ( | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| Serine protease A ( | + | − | + | − | + | + | − | + | − | + | + |
| Serine protease B ( | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| Enterotoxin b ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin c ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin d ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin e ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin g ( | + | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin h ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin i ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin j ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin k ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin l ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin m ( | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin n ( | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin o ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin q ( | − | − | - | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin r ( | − | − | - | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Enterotoxin u ( | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Clumping factor B ( | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Elastin-binding protein ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Fibronectin-binding protein ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Intracellular adhesion protein A ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Intracellular adhesion protein C ( | + | + | − | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| Intracellular adhesion protein D ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Exfoliative toxin A ( | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | − |
| Exfoliative toxin B ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Exfoliative toxin D ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Toxic shock syndrome toxine ( | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Leucotoxin D ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| Leucotoxin E ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
Fig. 1Minimum spanning trees of S. aureus isolates illustrate their genotypic relationship. Minimum spanning trees were based on up to 1861 cgMLST target genes, pairwise ignoring missing values. Every circle represents one genotype while connecting lines represent the number of different alleles in a pairwise comparison. a S. aureus isolates of different STAT3-HIES patients (P1–P4, using a different color for each patient). A reference sequence of a reference USA300 strain (NC_007793.1) was included as comparison (white). b The skin colonizing isolates of STAT3-HIES patient P3 (blue). c The isolate causing a lymph node abscess in STAT3-HIES patient P1 (P1.2, dark red) in comparison to three other isolates of the same patient. Isolates P1.1 and P1.3 are both isolated from a nose/throat screening swab (light red) but were collected 8 years apart. Isolate P1.4 (pink, perianal screening swab) has been collect at the same time point as P1.3
Fig. 2UPGMA-tree based on the toxin and virulence gene profile of eleven S. aureus isolates. The tree was drawn to scale with branches given in absolute alleles distance, using a different color for each patient (colors correspond to Fig. 1)