Henric Steffenfauseweh1, Yury V Vishnevskiy1, Beate Neumann1, Hans-Georg Stammler1, Diego M Andrada2, Rajendra S Ghadwal1. 1. Molecular Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Inorganic and Structural Chemistry, Center for Molecular Materials, Faculty of Chemistry, Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. 2. Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Department of Chemistry, Saarland University, Campus C4.1, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Abstract
Herein, we report on the synthesis, characterization, and reactivity studies of the first cyclic C2 As2 -diradicaloid {(IPr)CAs}2 (6) (IPr = C{N(Dipp)CH}2 ; Dipp = 2,6-iPr2 C6 H3 ). Treatment of (IPr)CH2 (1) with AsCl3 affords the Lewis adduct {(IPr)CH2 }AsCl3 (2). Compound 2 undergoes stepwise dehydrochlorination to yield {(IPr)CH}AsCl2 (3) and {(IPr)CAsCl}2 (5 a) or [{(IPr)CAs}2 Cl]OTf (5 b). Reduction of 5 a (or 5 b) with magnesium turnings gives 6 as a red crystalline solid in 90% yield. Compound 6 featuring a planar C2 As2 ring is diamagnetic and exhibits well resolved NMR signals. DFT calculations reveal a singlet ground state for 6 with a small singlet-triplet energy gap of 8.7 kcal mol-1 . The diradical character of 6 amounts to 20% (CASSCF, complete active space self consistent field) and 28% (DFT). Treatments of 6 with (PhSe)2 and Fe2 (CO)9 give rise to {(IPr)CAs(SePh)}2 (7) and {(IPr)CAs}2 Fe(CO)4 (8), respectively.
Herein, we report on the synthesis, characterization, and reactivity studies of the first cyclic C2 As2 -diradicaloid {(IPr)CAs}2 (6) (IPr = C{N(Dipp)CH}2 ; Dipp = 2,6-iPr2 C6 H3 ). Treatment of (IPr)CH2 (1) with AsCl3 affords the Lewis adduct {(IPr)CH2 }AsCl3 (2). Compound 2 undergoes stepwise dehydrochlorination to yield {(IPr)CH}AsCl2 (3) and {(IPr)CAsCl}2 (5 a) or [{(IPr)CAs}2 Cl]OTf (5 b). Reduction of 5 a (or 5 b) with magnesium turnings gives 6 as a red crystalline solid in 90% yield. Compound 6 featuring a planar C2 As2 ring is diamagnetic and exhibits well resolved NMR signals. DFT calculations reveal a singlet ground state for 6 with a small singlet-triplet energy gap of 8.7 kcal mol-1 . The diradical character of 6 amounts to 20% (CASSCF, complete active space self consistent field) and 28% (DFT). Treatments of 6 with (PhSe)2 and Fe2 (CO)9 give rise to {(IPr)CAs(SePh)}2 (7) and {(IPr)CAs}2 Fe(CO)4 (8), respectively.
Molecules containing two unpaired electrons in two degenerate (or nearly degenerate) orbitals are regarded as diradicals.
Singlet diradicals (or diradicaloids) are of a particular significance because of their intriguing electronic structures
and reactivity.
On account of their auspicious optical, magnetic, and electronic properties,
these open‐shell species have become highly sought‐after candidates for their applications in the design of advanced molecular materials.
Hence, the isolation and exploration of stable organic as well as main‐group diradical(oid)s remains a highly avid research topic in fundamental chemistry.In 1995, Niecke et al. reported the first stable diradicaloid I (Figure 1).
In 2002, Bertrand et al. isolated a P2B2‐diradicaloid II,
while a related aluminum species III was reported later by Schnöckel and co‐workers.
Among Group 14 elements, Power (E = Ge),
Lappert (E = Sn),
and Sekiguchi (E = Si)
reported Niecke‐type N2E2‐diradicaloids IV‐E. Over the last decade, Schulz and co‐workers have isolated cyclic N2E2‐diradicaloids V‐E and VI (E = P or As)
and explored their electronic structures and reactivity.[
,
] The stability of Niecke‐type diradicaloids (IV‐E)‐(VI) may be attributed to the captodative (donor–acceptor) effect of nitrogen atoms.
Each of the nitrogen atoms of (IV‐E)‐(VI) contributes 2e to the N2E2‐ring, giving rise to a formal Huckel's 4n+2 π‐electron aromatic system.
While diradical character and aromaticity are not mutually exclusive,
compounds with a large diradical character are expected to be weak (or non‐) aromatic.[
,
] In 2017, the research groups of Grützmacher
and Ghadwal
independently reported two different synthetic routes to a C2P2‐diradicaloid VII‐P based on an N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC), i.e. IPr (Figure 1). Note, the arsenic analogue VII‐As remained, nonetheless, thus far unknown. This is most likely due to the limitation of available synthetic methods and/or the lack of suitable starting materials. Herein, we report the first C2As2‐diradicaloid VII‐As as a red crystalline solid.
Figure 1
Selected examples of stable main‐group singlet diradicals.
Selected examples of stable main‐group singlet diradicals.Treatment of (IPr)CH2 (1) with AsCl3 affords the Lewis adduct {(IPr)CH2}AsCl3 (2) as a colorless crystalline solid in 87% yield (Scheme 1). In THF, 2 readily undergoes dehydrochlorination with 1 equiv of IPr base to afford the N‐heterocyclic vinyl (NHV)
derivative {(IPr)CH}AsCl2 (3). Compound 3 (lime green) has limited stability in solution as well as in the solid‐state. Samples of 3 (both solid as well as solutions) turned dark green on storing them at room temperature overnight. 1H NMR analyses of these samples indicated the formation of an intractable mixture of products including (IPrCH3)Cl and some residual 3. This suggests the auto‐deprotonation of 3, which can be rationalized by considering its Lewis basicity, like 1, owing to the presence of highly polarizable vinylic bond. Nonetheless, 3 can be converted into a thermally stable dimer [(IPr)CHAsCl}2Cl]OTf (4) on treatment of a freshly prepared PhF solution of 3 with TMSOTf. The dehydrochlorination of 3 is feasible with Et3N to obtain 5 a, albeit in a low yield (39%). Treatment of an acetonitrile solution of 4 with DABCO at 50 °C for two days affords 5 b as a dark green solid in 90% yield. 5 b is also accessible by reacting 5 a with TMSOTf or KOTf. Compounds 2–5 exhibit expected 1H and 13C NMR signals for the IPr moiety (see the Supporting Information). The 1H NMR spectrum of 2 shows a singlet at 3.06 ppm for the CH
2 group. The 1H NMR spectra of 3 (4.54 ppm) and 4 (3.35 ppm) show a singlet for the CHAs moiety.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 2, 3, 4, 5 a, and 5 b.
Synthesis of 2, 3, 4, 5 a, and 5 b.The molecular structures 2 and 4 (Figure 2) exhibit the expected atom connectivity.
The C28−As1 bond length of the Lewis adduct 2 (2.015(2) Å) compares well with that of (IPr)AsCl3 (2.018(3) Å).
The C(IPr)−C bond lengths of 2 (C1−C28: 1.480(2) Å) and 4 (C1−C2: 1.474(1) Å) are larger than that of (IPr)CH2 (1) (1.332(4) Å)
but consistent with the adducts of 1 with main‐group Lewis acids (ca. 1.48 Å).
The molecular structure of 5 a (Figure 3) has an inversion center thus the other half of the molecule was symmetry generated. The chlorides were occupied at two positions with a long [As1−Cl1A (2.395(7) Å] and a short [As1−Cl1B (2.309(7) Å] As−Cl bond lengths. The four‐membered C2As2 ring of 5 a has a plane fold angle of 6.88(6)° from the nearly coplanar peripheral C3N2‐rings. The C1−C4 (1.381(1) Å) and C4−As1 (1.909(1) Å) bond lengths of 5 a are smaller compared to those of 2 and 4, suggesting a modest double bond character (see below for NBO analyses).[
,
]
Figure 2
Molecular structures of 2 and 4. Dipp groups are shown as wire‐frame models. H atoms, except of CH or CH2 moiety, and solvent molecules are omitted for clarity. Thermal ellipsoids are depicted at 50% probability.
Figure 3
Solid‐state molecular structures of 5 a and 6. Dipp groups are shown as wire‐frames and H atoms are omitted for clarity. Thermal ellipsoids are depicted at 50% probability. Selected bond lenghts [Å] and bond angles [°] for 5 a: As–ClA 2.395(7), As–ClB 2.309(7) (structure has one long and one short As–Cl distances, only long one with ClA are shown), As1–C4 1.909(1), C1–C4 1.381(1); Cl1A‐As1‐C4 97.7(2), C4‐As1‐C4′ 80.9(1), As1‐C4‐As1′ 99.1(1). For 6: As1–C4 1.919(2), As1–C8 1.921(2), As2–C4 1.907(2), As2–C8 1.914(2), C1–C4 1.380(3), C8–C5 1.376(3); C4‐As1‐C8 79.1(1), C4‐As2‐C8 79.6(1), As1‐C4‐As2 100.8(1), As1‐C8‐As2 100.5(1).
Molecular structures of 2 and 4. Dipp groups are shown as wire‐frame models. H atoms, except of CH or CH2 moiety, and solvent molecules are omitted for clarity. Thermal ellipsoids are depicted at 50% probability.Solid‐state molecular structures of 5 a and 6. Dipp groups are shown as wire‐frames and H atoms are omitted for clarity. Thermal ellipsoids are depicted at 50% probability. Selected bond lenghts [Å] and bond angles [°] for 5 a: As–ClA 2.395(7), As–ClB 2.309(7) (structure has one long and one short As–Cl distances, only long one with ClA are shown), As1–C4 1.909(1), C1–C4 1.381(1); Cl1A‐As1‐C4 97.7(2), C4‐As1‐C4′ 80.9(1), As1‐C4‐As1′ 99.1(1). For 6: As1–C4 1.919(2), As1–C8 1.921(2), As2–C4 1.907(2), As2–C8 1.914(2), C1–C4 1.380(3), C8–C5 1.376(3); C4‐As1‐C8 79.1(1), C4‐As2‐C8 79.6(1), As1‐C4‐As2 100.8(1), As1‐C8‐As2 100.5(1).Treatment of a THF solution of 5 a (or 5 b) with Mg turnings leads to the formation of compound 6 as a red crystalline solid (Scheme 2). 6 is indefinitely stable under inert gas atmosphere but readily decomposes when exposed to air. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 6 exhibit well‐resolved signals due to the (IPr)C moiety. The 1H NMR spectrum of 6 shows two doublets (Me
2CH), one septet (Me2CH), and one singlet (NCH) for the IPr unit, indicating its highly symmetric structure.
Scheme 2
Reduction of 5 a (or 5 b) with magnesium (turnings) to 6 with representative diradical (A and B) and zwitterion (C and D) resonance forms.
Reduction of 5 a (or 5 b) with magnesium (turnings) to 6 with representative diradical (A and B) and zwitterion (C and D) resonance forms.The molecular structure of 6 (Figure 3) features a planar C2As2 ring that is twisted by 4.09(9)° and 2.89(10)° from the nearly coplanar peripheral C3N2‐rings. The trans‐annular As1⋅⋅⋅As2 interatomic distance of 6 (2.948(2) Å) is larger than the sum of the arsenic covalent radii (2.42 Å) but smaller than the sum of the van der Waals radii (3.70).
The As1−C4/As1−C8 (1.915(2)/1.921(2) Å) and C1−C4/C5−C8 (1.380(3)/1.376(3) Å) bond lengths of 6 are comparable to those of 5 a (1.909(1), 1.381(1) Å, respectively). They are also similar to those of divinyldiarsene [(IPr)C(Ph)As]2 (1.919(1), 1.376(2) Å) comprising a π‐conjugated linear C2As2C2‐framework.Further insight into the electronic structure of 6 was obtained by theoretical calculations. The DFT optimized structure of 6 at the RKS‐PBEh‐3c level of theory (Figure S35) is in good agreement with the XRD structure (Figure 3). We performed NBO (natural bond orbital) analyses for 1, 2, 5 a, and 6 (see the Supporting Information). The calculated Wiberg bond indices (WBIs) for the C1−C4 (5 a 1.41; 6 1.37) and C4−As1 (5 a 0.95; 6 1.02) bonds are consistent with their bond lengths (Figure 3). The NBO charges at the C1 (5 a 0.40; 6 0.39), C4 (5 a −0.98; 6 −0.85), and As (5 a 1.03; 6 0.40) atoms indicate strongly polarized C1=C4 bond and partial π‐electron density transfer on to the arsenic atoms of the C2As2 ring. For comparison, related details of compounds 1 (WBI for C1−C4 1.62) and 2 (WBIs for C1−C4 1.08, C4−As1 0.78) are also provided in the Supporting Information (Tables S5—S7). As previously described for the phosphorus analogue VII‐P (Figure 1),
compound 6 may also be viewed as an NHC‐stabilized C2As2‐cluster.The HOMO of 6 is a π‐type orbital mainly located at the arsenic atoms of the C2As2 ring and has trans‐annular antibonding combination (Figure 4). The LUMO spans mainly over the C2As2C2‐framework with some contribution from the nitrogen atoms. Note that the LUMO has trans‐annular bonding combination. These features are consistent with Niecke‐type singlet N2E2‐diradicals (IV‐E)‐(VI) (Figure 1). The HOMO–LUMO energy gap (ΔE
H‐L = 2.47 eV) of 6 is rather small, suggesting its high reactivity (see below). The UV/Vis spectrum of 6 (Figure S26) exhibits three main absorptions (λ
max) at 369, 519, and 655 nm, which based on TD‐DFT calculations (Table S11) can be assigned to HOMO−1→LUMO+9, HOMO→LUMO+7/ HOMO−1→LUMO, and HOMO→LUMO transitions, respectively.
Figure 4
HOMO and LUMO of 6 (0.05 a.u. isosurface, PBE0/def2‐TZVP).
HOMO and LUMO of 6 (0.05 a.u. isosurface, PBE0/def2‐TZVP).Despite the closed‐shell singlet (CS) ground state, the singlet‐triplet energy gap (ΔE
S‐T = 8.7 kcal mol−1) calculated for 6 at the PBEh‐3c level of theory is fairly small. Interestingly, the broken‐symmetry open‐shell singlet (OS) solution for 6 is calculated to be 0.34 kcal mol−1 lower in energy than the CS electronic state. The diradical character (y) according to Yamaguchi
is calculated to be 28%. The multireference SA‐CASSCF(10,8)/def2‐TZVP calculations reveal that the ground electronic state S0 has the active space occupation pattern 22222000 (88%) and 22220200 (10%). The diradical character (β) for the CASSCF electronic structure S0 amounts to 20%. Like Niecke‐type singlet diradicals IV–VII (Figure 1), 6 may also be regarded as a 6π electron C2As2 ring system. However, the calculated nuclear independent chemical shift (NICS) (NICS(1) = −3.4; NICS(1)zz = −0.1) values indicate a rather weak aromatic character of the C2As2 ring (Table S12, Figure S42). This is also consistent with the weak ring current at the C2As2 ring of 6 as visualized by the ACID (anisotropy of the induced current density) plots (Figure S43).
Though aromaticity and diradical character are not mutually exclusive,
a rather weak aromaticity of 6 may account for the diradical character.[
,
]Dihydrogen splitting is considered as a benchmark reaction of diradicals.
No change in the 1H NMR spectrum was observed upon exposure of a C6D6 solution of 6 to H2 (1 atm) at room temperature. Warming this solution at 80 °C for 2 h led to the decomposition of 6 as evident by the formation of (IPr)CH2. We attempted an alternative method for the preparation of the hydride 6‐H2 by reacting 5 a with KHB(sec‐Bu)3 (Scheme 3a). This reaction, however, afforded 6 and 1 instead of 6‐H2. We assume that 6‐H2 is unstable and decomposes into 6 and H2, which is calculated to be thermodynamically favored by 9.1 kcal mol−1. We also carried out low temperature 1H NMR studies of a reaction of 5 a and KHB(sec‐Bu)3, which showed the formation of H2 already at 233 K (Figure S1). At 293 K, the 1H NMR spectrum indicates the presence of 6, 1, and H2 as sole reaction products.
Scheme 3
a) Reaction of 5 a with KHB(sec‐Bu)3 to 6. b) Synthesis of 7 and 8.
a) Reaction of 5 a with KHB(sec‐Bu)3 to 6. b) Synthesis of 7 and 8.Reactions of 6 with (PhSe)2 and Fe2(CO)9 afford compounds 7 and 8, respectively (Scheme 3). Compounds 7 and 8 are stable solids and have been characterized by NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (Figure 5). The molecular structure of 7 shows the presence of SePh substituents at the arsenic atom in cis‐fashion. In 7, the C−C (1.377(4)/1.374(4) Å) and C−As (1.927(3)–1.936(3) Å) bond lengths of the C2As2 ring are comparable to those of 5 a. As expected for unsymmetrically substituted C2As2 ring in 8, the As1−C4/As1−C8 (1.960(3)/1.964(3) Å) bond lengths are longer than As2−C7/As2−C8 (1.871(3)/1.881(3) Å). Thus, the latter have a partial multiple bond character, while the positive charge is formally distributed over the imidazole rings. The As−Fe bond length of 8 (2.475(1) Å) is larger than that of the electrophilic arsinidene complex {(IPr)CPh}As]Fe(CO)4 (2.367(4) Å)
but compares well with four‐coordinated nucleophilic arsinidene species (2.48 Å).
Figure 5
Solid‐state molecular structures of 7 and 8. H atoms have been omitted and aryl groups are shown as wireframe for clarity. Thermal ellipsoids are depicted at 50% probability.
Solid‐state molecular structures of 7 and 8. H atoms have been omitted and aryl groups are shown as wireframe for clarity. Thermal ellipsoids are depicted at 50% probability.In conclusion, the C2As2‐diradicaloid 6 embedded between NHC (IPr) moieties has been isolated as a crystalline solid and characterized by spectroscopic and X‐ray diffraction methods. Calculations suggest a singlet ground state for 6 with a considerably small singlet‐triplet energy gap (8.7 kcal mol−1). The calculated diradical character of 6 amounts to 20% (CASSCF) and 28% (PUHF, projection unrestricted Hartree–Fock). Reactivity of 6 has been shown with (PhSe)2 and Fe2(CO)9, affording compounds 7 and 8, respectively.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.Supporting InformationClick here for additional data file.
Authors: S M Ibrahim Al-Rafia; Adam C Malcolm; Sean K Liew; Michael J Ferguson; Robert McDonald; Eric Rivard Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Jonas Bresien; Axel Schulz; Lilian Sophie Szych; Alexander Villinger; Ronald Wustrack Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Tobias Ullrich; Piermaria Pinter; Julian Messelberger; Philipp Haines; Ramandeep Kaur; Max M Hansmann; Dominik Munz; Dirk M Guldi Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Henric Steffenfauseweh; Yury V Vishnevskiy; Beate Neumann; Hans-Georg Stammler; Diego M Andrada; Rajendra S Ghadwal Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 16.823