Literature DB >> 35652310

Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods.

Mark A Stevenson1, Simon M Firestone1, Anita Tolpinrud1, John Stenos2, Anne-Lise Chaber3, Joanne M Devlin1, Catherine Herbert4, An Pas5, Magdalena Dunowska6.   

Abstract

Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian latent class models; Coxiella burnetii; ELISA; Q fever; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; immunofluorescence assay; macropods; sensitivity; specificity; test validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35652310      PMCID: PMC9297833          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00236-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   11.677


  43 in total

1.  Marsupial and monotreme serum immunoglobulin binding by proteins A, G and L and anti-kangaroo antibody.

Authors:  Paola K Vaz; Carol A Hartley; Glenn F Browning; Joanne M Devlin
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Coxiella burnetii in wild mammals: A systematic review.

Authors:  David González-Barrio; Francisco Ruiz-Fons
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 5.005

3.  The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions.

Authors:  David Lunn; David Spiegelhalter; Andrew Thomas; Nicky Best
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Truckin' pneumonia--an outbreak of Q fever in a truck repair plant probably due to aerosols from clothing contaminated by contact with newborn kittens.

Authors:  T J Marrie; D Langille; V Papukna; L Yates
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.451

5.  Poikilotherms as reservoirs of Q-fever (Coxiella burnetii) in Uttar Pradesh.

Authors:  M P Yadav; M S Sethi
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 1.535

6.  Comparison of Coxiella burnetii shedding in milk of dairy bovine, caprine, and ovine herds.

Authors:  A Rodolakis; M Berri; C Héchard; C Caudron; A Souriau; C C Bodier; B Blanchard; P Camuset; P Devillechaise; J C Natorp; J P Vadet; N Arricau-Bouvery
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Coxiella burnetii (Q-Fever) Seroprevalence in Prey and Predators in the United Kingdom: Evaluation of Infection in Wild Rodents, Foxes and Domestic Cats Using a Modified ELISA.

Authors:  A L Meredith; S C Cleaveland; M J Denwood; J K Brown; D J Shaw
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.005

8.  Detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA in wildlife and ticks in northern Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  A Cooper; J Stephens; N Ketheesan; B Govan
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.133

9.  A longitudinal study of serological responses to Coxiella burnetii and shedding at kidding among intensively-managed goats supports early use of vaccines.

Authors:  Michael Muleme; Angus Campbell; John Stenos; Joanne M Devlin; Gemma Vincent; Alexander Cameron; Stephen Graves; Colin R Wilks; Simon Firestone
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.683

10.  Comparison of three serological tests for the detection of Coxiella burnetii specific antibodies in European wild rabbits.

Authors:  Charles Caraguel; Sarah Bassett; David González-Barrio; Peter Elsworth; Anne-Lise Chaber
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.