Literature DB >> 24479951

Coxiella burnetii (Q-Fever) Seroprevalence in Prey and Predators in the United Kingdom: Evaluation of Infection in Wild Rodents, Foxes and Domestic Cats Using a Modified ELISA.

A L Meredith1, S C Cleaveland2, M J Denwood3, J K Brown4, D J Shaw1.   

Abstract

Coxiella burnetii, the agent of Q-fever, is recognized as a worldwide zoonosis with a wide host range and potentially complex reservoir systems. Infected ruminants are the main source of infection for humans, but cats and other mammals, including wild rodents, also represent potential sources of infection. There has been a recent upsurge of reported cases in humans, domestic ruminants and wildlife in many parts of the world, and studies have indicated that wild brown rats may act as true reservoirs for C. burnetii and be implicated in outbreaks in livestock and humans. However, investigation of reservoir systems is limited by lack of validated serological tests for wildlife or other non-target species. In this study, serum samples from 796 wild rodents (180 bank voles, 309 field voles, 307 wood mice) 102 wild foxes and 26 domestic cats from three study areas in the UK were tested for the presence of antibodies to C. burnetii using a commercial indirect ELISA kit modified for use in multiple wildlife species. Test thresholds were determined for each species in the absence of species-specific reference sera using a bi-modal latent class mixture model to discriminate between positive from negative results. Based on the thresholds determined, seroprevalence in the wild rodents ranged from 15.6% to 19.1% depending on species (overall 17.3%) and was significantly higher in both foxes (41.2%) and cats (61.5%) than in rodents. This is the first report to quantify seroprevalence to C. burnetii in bank voles, field voles, wood mice, foxes and cats in the UK and provides evidence that predator species could act as indicators for the presence of C. burnetii in rodents. The study demonstrates that wildlife species could be significant reservoirs of infection for both livestock and humans, and the high seroprevalence in domestic cats highlights the potential zoonotic risk from this species.
© 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coxiella burnetii; Q-fever; sentinel; wildlife reservoir

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24479951     DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis        ISSN: 1865-1674            Impact factor:   5.005


  18 in total

1.  Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans innate immune response to Coxiella burnetii.

Authors:  James M Battisti; Lance A Watson; Myo T Naung; Adam M Drobish; Ekaterina Voronina; Michael F Minnick
Journal:  Innate Immun       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.680

2.  Molecular survey of Ehrlichia canis and Coxiella burnetii infections in wild mammals of southern Italy.

Authors:  Mario Santoro; Vincenzo Veneziano; Nicola D'Alessio; Francesca Di Prisco; Maria Gabriella Lucibelli; Giorgia Borriello; Anna Cerrone; Filipe Dantas-Torres; Maria Stefania Latrofa; Domenico Otranto; Giorgio Galiero
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods.

Authors:  Mark A Stevenson; Simon M Firestone; Anita Tolpinrud; John Stenos; Anne-Lise Chaber; Joanne M Devlin; Catherine Herbert; An Pas; Magdalena Dunowska
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 11.677

4.  A Freedom of Coxiella burnetii Infection Survey in European Bison (Bison bonasus) in Poland.

Authors:  Michał K Krzysiak; Martyna Puchalska; Wanda Olech; Krzysztof Anusz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings.

Authors:  Olubunmi R Aminu; Tiziana Lembo; Ruth N Zadoks; Roman Biek; Suzanna Lewis; Ireen Kiwelu; Blandina T Mmbaga; Deogratius Mshanga; Gabriel Shirima; Matt Denwood; Taya L Forde
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-09-14

6.  Wide exposure to Coxiella burnetii in ruminant and feline species living in a natural environment: zoonoses in a human-livestock-wildlife interface.

Authors:  M G Candela; A Caballol; P M Atance
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.434

7.  Detection and Genotyping of Coxiella burnetii and Coxiella-Like Bacteria in Horses in South Korea.

Authors:  Min-Goo Seo; Seung-Hun Lee; Dorene VanBik; In-Ohk Ouh; Sun-Hee Yun; Eunsang Choi; Yong-Soo Park; Sang-Eun Lee; Jong Wan Kim; Gil-Jae Cho; Oh-Deog Kwon; Dongmi Kwak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Long-Term Dynamics of Coxiella burnetii in Farmed Red Deer (Cervus elaphus).

Authors:  David González-Barrio; Isabel G Fernández-de-Mera; José Antonio Ortiz; João Queirós; Francisco Ruiz-Fons
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-12-11

Review 9.  Evaluation of Immunofluorescence Antibody Test Used for the Diagnosis of Canine Leishmaniasis in the Mediterranean Basin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Amel Adel; Dirk Berkvens; Emmanuel Abatih; Abdelkrim Soukehal; Juana Bianchini; Claude Saegerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos-Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?

Authors:  Pavlína Pittermannová; Alena Žákovská; Petr Váňa; Jiřina Marková; František Treml; Lenka Černíková; Marie Budíková; Eva Bártová
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.