| Literature DB >> 35646088 |
Hong Dong1, Zheng Dong2, Fuwen Wang2, Gang Wang2, Xiaoyu Luo2, Chuzhao Lei2, Jingbo Chen1.
Abstract
The diversity of livestock coat color results from human positive selection and is an indispensable part of breed registration. As an important biodiversity resource, Asiatic wild ass has many special characteristics, including the most visualized feature, its yellowish-brown coat color, and excellent adaptation. To explore the genetic mechanisms of phenotypic characteristics in Asiatic wild ass and its hybrids, we resequenced the whole genome of one Mongolian Kulan (a subspecies of Asiatic wild ass) and 29 Kulan hybrids (Mongolian Kulan ♂×Xinjiang♀), and the ancestor composition indicated the true lineage of the hybrids. XP-EHH (Cross Population Extended Haplotype Homozygosity), θπ-ratio (Nucleotide Diversity Ratio), CLR (Composite Likelihood Ratio) and θπ (Nucleotide Diversity) methods were used to detect the candidate regions of positive selection in Asiatic wild ass and its hybrids. Several immune genes (DEFA1, DEFA5, DEFA7, GIMAP4, GIMAP1, IGLC1, IGLL5, GZMB and HLA) were observed by the CLR and θπ methods. XP-EHH and θπ-ratio revealed that these genes are potentially responsible for coat color (KITLG) and meat quality traits (PDE1B and MYLK2). Furthermore, the heatmap was able to show the clear difference in the haplotype of the KITLG gene between the Kulan hybrids and Asiatic wild ass group and the Guanzhong black donkey group, which is a powerful demonstration of the key role of KITLG in donkey color. Therefore, our study may provide new insights into the genetic basis of coat color, meat quality traits and immunity of Asiatic wild ass and its hybrids.Entities:
Keywords: KITLG; asiatic wild ass; coat color; genetic diversity; whole genome analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35646088 PMCID: PMC9135160 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.818420
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
FIGURE 1The genetic structure of the donkey populations. (A) Neighbor-joining tree of the phylogenetic relationships identified among 58 donkeys analyzed, distributed as 8 E-AA in blue (Africa wild ass, Equus-asinus-africanus), 10 Guanzhong in purple (Chinese donkey breed), 6 Xinjiang in green (Chinese donkey breed), 5 E-HH in yellow (Asiatic wild ass, Equus-hemionus), 29 Kulan hybrids in red (Mongolian Kulan♂×Xinjiang♀). (B) Principal Component Analysis of 5 donkey breeds. (C) Bayesian model-based clustering (from K = 2 to K = 4) of 58 donkeys.
FIGURE 2Summary statistics for genomic variation. (A) The distribution of the total number of ROHs across chromosomes. (B) The distribution of lengths of ROHs in each breed. (C) Genome-wide distribution of nucleotide diversity of each breed in 50 kb windows with 50 kb steps. The horizontal line inside the box indicates the median of this distribution; box limits indicate the first and third quartiles; and points show outliers. Data points outside the whiskers can be considered outliers. (D) Genome-wide average LD decay estimated from each breed.
FIGURE 3Analysis of the signatures of positive selection in the genome. (A) Manhattan plot of selective sweeps. (B) Venn diagram showing the genes overlapping among θπ, CLR, θπ-ratio and XP-EHH. (C) Linkage disequilibrium analysis of the SNPs in KITLG regions.