Literature DB >> 32698165

Identification of profiles of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath by means of an electronic nose as a proposal for a screening method for breast cancer: a case-control study.

Lorena Díaz de León-Martínez1, Maribel Rodríguez-Aguilar1, Patricia Gorocica-Rosete2, Carlos Alberto Domínguez-Reyes3, Verónica Martínez-Bustos3, Juan Alberto Tenorio-Torres3, Omar Ornelas-Rebolledo4, José Alfonso Cruz-Ramos5, Berenice Balderas-Segura2, Rogelio Flores-Ramírez6.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to identify volatile prints from exhaled breath, termed breath-print, from breast cancer (BC) patients and healthy women by means of an electronic nose and to evaluate its potential use as a screening method. A cross-sectional study was performed on 443 exhaled breath samples from women, of whom 262 had been diagnosed with BC by biopsy and 181 were healthy women (control group). Breath-print analysis was performed utilizing the Cyranose 320 electronic nose. Group data were evaluated by principal component analysis (PCA), canonical discriminant analysis (CDA), and support vector machine (SVM), and the test's diagnostic power was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The results obtained using the model generated from the CDA, which best describes the behavior of the assessed groups, indicated that the breath-print of BC patients was different from that of healthy women and that they presented with a variability of up to 98.8% and a correct classification of 98%. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value reached 100% according to the ROC curve. The present study demonstrates the capability of the electronic nose to separate between healthy subjects and BC patients. This research could have a beneficial impact on clinical practice as we consider that this test could probably be used at the first point before the application of established gold tests (mammography, ultrasound, and biopsy) and substantially improve screening tests in the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32698165     DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/aba83f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breath Res        ISSN: 1752-7155            Impact factor:   3.262


  5 in total

Review 1.  Breath Analysis: A Promising Tool for Disease Diagnosis-The Role of Sensors.

Authors:  Maria Kaloumenou; Evangelos Skotadis; Nefeli Lagopati; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Dimitris Tsoukalas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Diagnostic Performance of Electronic Noses in Cancer Diagnoses Using Exhaled Breath: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max H M C Scheepers; Zaid Al-Difaie; Lloyd Brandts; Andrea Peeters; Bart van Grinsven; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 3.  Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis as a Potential Novel Screening Tool for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michelle Leemans; Pierre Bauër; Vincent Cuzuel; Etienne Audureau; Isabelle Fromantin
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Breath biopsy of breast cancer using sensor array signals and machine learning analysis.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yu Yang; Yi-Chia Wang; Hsin-Yi Peng; Chi-Hsiang Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer.

Authors:  Shoko Kure; Sera Satoi; Toshihiko Kitayama; Yuta Nagase; Nobuo Nakano; Marina Yamada; Noboru Uchiyama; Satoshi Miyashita; Shinya Iida; Hiroyuki Takei; Masao Miyashita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.