| Literature DB >> 31997919 |
Maria Niedertscheider1, Erich Tasser2, Monika Patek3, Johannes Rüdisser4, Ulrike Tappeiner2,4, Karl-Heinz Erb1.
Abstract
The role of ecosystems as carbon (C) sinks or sources is intrinsically related to land-use intensity, which determines the land required for biomass production. Here, we systematically investigate the role of different land-use types including their land-use intensities on vegetation C-stocks (SCact) in the Stubai valley, located in the Austrian central Alps. After a period of high land-use impacts until 1954, indicated by massive C-depletion, land-use shifted to completely new courses. Polarization into high-intensity low-land areas and extensification at higher altitudes allowed for a tripling of SCact until 2003. The most important land-use change was the intensification of the livestock sector accompanied by abandonment of extensive grasslands and reduced harvest pressure on forests after WWII. Market integration, abundance of fossil energy carriers, as well as structural change of the economy were important underlying socio-economic drivers of these trends. However, despite this remarkable SCact increase, SCact amounted to only 62% of the potential carbon stocks (SCpot) in 2003. Although conversion of forests to agriculture clearly contributed the lion's share to this SC-gap, forest management explains roughly one quarter of the SC-difference. We found that time-lags between land-use shifts and the establishment of a new C-climax had fundamental repercussions on recent C-dynamics in the study region. Apparently, the land system is still net-accumulating C, although land-use changes have peaked decades earlier. Our findings are crucial for the understanding of C-dynamics, including the role of land management and time-lags in mountainous regions, which are regarded key areas for terrestrial C-sequestration.Entities:
Keywords: HANPP; LTSER; carbon stock; energy transition; forest management; land-use intensity; socio-economic drivers
Year: 2017 PMID: 31997919 PMCID: PMC6956954 DOI: 10.1007/s10021-017-0120-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecosystems ISSN: 1432-9840 Impact factor: 4.217
Data and Methods Used for the Empirical Work of This Study
| LULC-type | Data used | Main methods |
|---|---|---|
| SCact | ||
| Forests | Primary sources: Historic forest inventory maps (see Patek | Data used directly for 1954, 1976 and 2003; recalculation for years 1865 and 1988 |
| Shrublands | Primary sources: Historic forest inventory maps (see Patek | Data used directly for 1954, 1976 and 2003; recalculation for years 1865 and 1988 |
| Extensive grasslands, unused grasslands, unused/unproductive areas; settlement areas | Literature (SOM Table S3) | Literature on either C-stocks, or on NPP combined with turn-over times for different grassland types; secondary succession of woody plant species modelled |
| Croplands/intensive grasslands | Harvest statistics, literature (SOM Table S3) | Aboveground: croplands harvest extrapolated with “pre-harvest-loss” factors and mowing rates, belowground: literature data |
| NPPact | ||
| Forests | Primary sources: Historic forest inventory maps (see Patek | SCact divided by stand age; expansion factors for litter |
| Shrublands | Primary sources: Historic forest inventory maps (see Patek | SCact divided by stand age in 2003; before constant 2003 SCact |
| Extensive grasslands; unused grasslands, unused/unproductive areas | Literature (SOM Table S3) | Literature on either C-stocks, or on NPP combined with turn-over times for different grassland types; secondary succession of woody plant species modelled |
| Croplands/intensive grasslands | Harvest statistics, literature (SOM Table S3) | Cropland harvest extrapolated with “pre-harvest loss factors”, multiple mowing events based on mowing factor |
| Settlement areas | 1/3 of NPPpot | Modelled based on Haberl and others ( |
| HANPPharv | ||
| Forests | Forest harvest statistics, literature on litter and forest grazing demand | Timber volumes converted to C-units, grazing and litter demand per livestock unit |
| Extensive grasslands | Livestock statistics, literature | Feed demand modelled through livestock numbers and feed demand values; literature on grassland biomass available for grazing |
| Croplands/intensive grasslands | Harvest statistics; literature | Cropland primary harvest extrapolated with harvest indices and recovery rates, literature |
| Settlement areas | 1/2 of NPPact | Modelled based on Haberl and others ( |
Figure 1Patterns of LULC (A–C), SC (E–G) and NPP (I–K) in the Stubai valley. Maps in the first row show patterns for the year 1865, the second row for 2003 and the bottom maps show the potential land system. (D) Trends of LULC-changes for all time cuts (1865, 1954, 1973, 1988, 2003) broken down to the main LULC-classes, (H) SC and (I) NPP values for all time cuts normalized by the total study area. Colour codes of the LULC legend (C) matches the colour codes of D, H and L (Color figure online).
SCact, and NPPact in 1865 and 2003 Broken Down to the Main LULC-Types
| Forest land | Shrublands | Extensive grasslands | Intensive grass-/croplands | Infrastructure | Unused grasslands/shrublands | Low productive/alpine | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCact (gC m−2) | 1865 | 3316 | 2939 | 1016 | 828 | 202 | 0 | 51 | 939 |
| 2003 | 11 217 | 3489 | 1808 | 803 | 382 | 3336 | 86 | 3050 | |
| NPPact (gC m−2 a−1) | 1865 | 187 | 172 | 272 | 414 | 264 | 0 | 45 | 158 |
| 2003 | 551 | 413 | 268 | 730 | 290 | 389 | 47 | 262 | |
| SC-gap (1000 tC) (% of total gap) | 1865 | 513 (29) | 53 (3) | 751 (42) | 124 (7) | 2 (0) | 0 | 334 (19) | 1777 (100) |
| 2003 | 284 (23) | 128 (10) | 210 (17) | 125 (10) | 17 (1) | 169 (14) | 318 (25) | 1251 (100) |
The SC-gap indicates the distance between SCact in 1865 and in 2003 to the potential system, using the 1865 and 2003 LULC-masks.
Figure 2Land-use intensity trends, socio-economic changes and climatic changes from 1865 to 2003: A harvested biomass (HANPPharv) and B HANPP in 1000 tC a−1; C HANPPharv per area, D HANPP as percentage of NPPpot; E share of NPPact harvested per year (HANPPharv % NPPact); F tractor numbers and nitrogen (N) inputs per area of intensive grasslands/croplands (only Austrian levels available) and manure per area of agricultural land (intensive grassland/cropland plus extensive grasslands); G people employed in agriculture as share of the working population and population numbers (secondary axis); H HANPPharv per agricultural worker and per person (secondary axis); I temperature and precipitation (secondary axis) data for Innsbruck city, J NPP trend based on the MIAMI model calculated with data from (I). The semi-transparent area between the first and second time-cut indicates lacking data, trends between 1865 and 1954 were linearly interpolated.
Figure 3Forest dynamics (Index 1865 = 100%): Forest HANPPharv, forest NPPact, forest SCact and forest area trends from 1865 to 2003. The semi-transparent areas indicated missing data and a linear interpolation of trends.