Literature DB >> 18338209

Prevention of anastomotic stricture with a purse-string suture technique on the gastric side during esophageal carcinoma operations: retrospective study of 463 consecutive cases.

Chong Zhang1, Min-Hua Yao, Tao Jin, Li Sun, Jian Hu, Yu-Xin Zha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a gastric side purse-string technique on anastomotic strictures during esophageal carcinoma operations.
METHODS: From 1996 to 2005, esophageal carcinoma operations were performed on 1128 consecutive patients. Among them, 463 underwent esophagogastric anastomosis with purse-string sutures on the gastric side (purse group) and the other 665 did not (nonpurse group). Anastomotic strictures, reflux, and leakage were analyzed and compared between the two groups after the operations.
RESULTS: Complete follow-up was conducted on all 1128 patients within 6 months after the operation. In contrast to the nonpurse group with a postoperative anastomotic stricture rate of 5.4% (36/665), the purse group demonstrated a significantly lower rate (0.2%, 1/463). The occurrence rates of anastomotic leakage in the nonpurse and purse groups were 0.9% (6/665) and 0.4% (2/463), respectively. Of the 17 cases of gastroesophageal reflux, 15 (15/665, 1.8%) were found in the nonpurse group and 2 (2/463, 1.1%) in the purse group.
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, a purse-string suture technique on the gastric side might be an effective method for preventing the occurrence of anastomotic strictures after esophageal resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18338209     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9457-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  10 in total

1.  Anastomotic diameters and strictures following esophagectomy and total gastrectomy in 256 patients.

Authors:  J Johansson; T Zilling; C S von Holstein; F Johnsson; S Oberg; B Walther
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Oesophageal surgery.

Authors:  E J Simchuk; D Alderson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses.

Authors:  A L Beitler; J D Urschel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparison of influence of esophageal carcinoma operations on pulmonary function.

Authors:  Jian Hu; Renyuan Li; Li Sun; Yiming Ni
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Endoscopic dilation of gastroesophageal anastomosis stricture after gastric bypass.

Authors:  C A Barba; M S Butensky; M Lorenzo; R Newman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management.

Authors:  P Honkoop; P D Siersema; H W Tilanus; L P Stassen; W C Hop; M van Blankenstein
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture.

Authors:  J Wong; H Cheung; R Lui; Y W Fan; A Smith; K F Siu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Influence of esophageal carcinoma operations on gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Jian Hu; Renyuan Li; Li Sun; Yiming Ni
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Stapler design and strictures at the esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  R G Berrisford; R D Page; R J Donnelly
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.