Literature DB >> 35634782

AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching.

Devlina Chakravarty1, Lauren L Porter1,2.   

Abstract

AlphaFold2 has revolutionized protein structure prediction by leveraging sequence information to rapidly model protein folds with atomic-level accuracy. Nevertheless, previous work has shown that these predictions tend to be inaccurate for structurally heterogeneous proteins. To systematically assess factors that contribute to this inaccuracy, we tested AlphaFold2's performance on 98-fold-switching proteins, which assume at least two distinct-yet-stable secondary and tertiary structures. Topological similarities were quantified between five predicted and two experimentally determined structures of each fold-switching protein. Overall, 94% of AlphaFold2 predictions captured one experimentally determined conformation but not the other. Despite these biased results, AlphaFold2's estimated confidences were moderate-to-high for 74% of fold-switching residues, a result that contrasts with overall low confidences for intrinsically disordered proteins, which are also structurally heterogeneous. To investigate factors contributing to this disparity, we quantified sequence variation within the multiple sequence alignments used to generate AlphaFold2's predictions of fold-switching and intrinsically disordered proteins. Unlike intrinsically disordered regions, whose sequence alignments show low conservation, fold-switching regions had conservation rates statistically similar to canonical single-fold proteins. Furthermore, intrinsically disordered regions had systematically lower prediction confidences than either fold-switching or single-fold proteins, regardless of sequence conservation. AlphaFold2's high prediction confidences for fold switchers indicate that it uses sophisticated pattern recognition to search for one most probable conformer rather than protein biophysics to model a protein's structural ensemble. Thus, it is not surprising that its predictions often fail for proteins whose properties are not fully apparent from solved protein structures. Our results emphasize the need to look at protein structure as an ensemble and suggest that systematic examination of fold-switching sequences may reveal propensities for multiple stable secondary and tertiary structures. Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AlphaFold2; fold-switching; protein-folding; structural heterogeneity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35634782      PMCID: PMC9134877          DOI: 10.1002/pro.4353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.993


  43 in total

1.  How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?

Authors:  Jinrui Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Probing transient excited states of the bacterial cell division regulator MinE by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Mengli Cai; Ying Huang; Yang Shen; Min Li; Michiyo Mizuuchi; Rodolfo Ghirlando; Kiyoshi Mizuuchi; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  Reframing the Protein Folding Problem: Entropy as Organizer.

Authors:  George D Rose
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  The breakthrough in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Andrei N Lupas; Joana Pereira; Vikram Alva; Felipe Merino; Murray Coles; Marcus D Hartmann
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  AlphaFold2 predicts the inward-facing conformation of the multidrug transporter LmrP.

Authors:  Diego Del Alamo; Cédric Govaerts; Hassane S Mchaourab
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-05-18

7.  DisProt in 2022: improved quality and accessibility of protein intrinsic disorder annotation.

Authors:  Federica Quaglia; Bálint Mészáros; Edoardo Salladini; András Hatos; Rita Pancsa; Lucía B Chemes; Mátyás Pajkos; Tamas Lazar; Samuel Peña-Díaz; Jaime Santos; Veronika Ács; Nazanin Farahi; Erzsébet Fichó; Maria Cristina Aspromonte; Claudio Bassot; Anastasia Chasapi; Norman E Davey; Radoslav Davidović; Laszlo Dobson; Arne Elofsson; Gábor Erdős; Pascale Gaudet; Michelle Giglio; Juliana Glavina; Javier Iserte; Valentín Iglesias; Zsófia Kálmán; Matteo Lambrughi; Emanuela Leonardi; Sonia Longhi; Sandra Macedo-Ribeiro; Emiliano Maiani; Julia Marchetti; Cristina Marino-Buslje; Attila Mészáros; Alexander Miguel Monzon; Giovanni Minervini; Suvarna Nadendla; Juliet F Nilsson; Marian Novotný; Christos A Ouzounis; Nicolás Palopoli; Elena Papaleo; Pedro José Barbosa Pereira; Gabriele Pozzati; Vasilis J Promponas; Jordi Pujols; Alma Carolina Sanchez Rocha; Martin Salas; Luciana Rodriguez Sawicki; Eva Schad; Aditi Shenoy; Tamás Szaniszló; Konstantinos D Tsirigos; Nevena Veljkovic; Gustavo Parisi; Salvador Ventura; Zsuzsanna Dosztányi; Peter Tompa; Silvio C E Tosatto; Damiano Piovesan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A high-throughput predictive method for sequence-similar fold switchers.

Authors:  Allen K Kim; Loren L Looger; Lauren L Porter
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.

Authors:  Pauli Virtanen; Ralf Gommers; Travis E Oliphant; Matt Haberland; Tyler Reddy; David Cournapeau; Evgeni Burovski; Pearu Peterson; Warren Weckesser; Jonathan Bright; Stéfan J van der Walt; Matthew Brett; Joshua Wilson; K Jarrod Millman; Nikolay Mayorov; Andrew R J Nelson; Eric Jones; Robert Kern; Eric Larson; C J Carey; İlhan Polat; Yu Feng; Eric W Moore; Jake VanderPlas; Denis Laxalde; Josef Perktold; Robert Cimrman; Ian Henriksen; E A Quintero; Charles R Harris; Anne M Archibald; Antônio H Ribeiro; Fabian Pedregosa; Paul van Mulbregt
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold.

Authors:  John Jumper; Richard Evans; Alexander Pritzel; Tim Green; Michael Figurnov; Olaf Ronneberger; Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool; Russ Bates; Augustin Žídek; Anna Potapenko; Alex Bridgland; Clemens Meyer; Simon A A Kohl; Andrew J Ballard; Andrew Cowie; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Stanislav Nikolov; Rishub Jain; Demis Hassabis; Jonas Adler; Trevor Back; Stig Petersen; David Reiman; Ellen Clancy; Michal Zielinski; Martin Steinegger; Michalina Pacholska; Tamas Berghammer; Sebastian Bodenstein; David Silver; Oriol Vinyals; Andrew W Senior; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Pushmeet Kohli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching.

Authors:  Devlina Chakravarty; Lauren L Porter
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  SPEACH_AF: Sampling protein ensembles and conformational heterogeneity with Alphafold2.

Authors:  Richard A Stein; Hassane S Mchaourab
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Confrontation of AlphaFold models with experimental structures enlightens conformational dynamics supporting CYP102A1 functions.

Authors:  Philippe Urban; Denis Pompon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.