| Literature DB >> 35634221 |
Xiaoze Liu1, Daren Wu1,2, Jingwen Liu1,2, Guiling Li1,2, Zhengxiao Zhang1,2, Chaoxiang Chen1,2, Lingyu Zhang1,2, Jian Li1,2.
Abstract
Pickled radish is a general source of natural bioactive compounds that include phenols. Here, we used molecular docking, fluorescence quenching, circular dichroism spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations to identify potential inhibitors against xanthine oxidase from a library of pickled radish compounds. The most effective compounds were selected for validation through in vitro experiments including enzyme activity inhibition tests, and cell-based assays. Molecular docking results revealed that 2,6-Dihydroxyacetophenone, 4-Hydroxyphenethyl alcohol, and 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde exhibited significant effects on xanthine oxidase inhibition. Three phenols have varying degrees of inhibition on xanthine oxidase, which is driven by hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds and affects the secondary structure and hydrophobic homeostasis of xanthine oxidase. The stability of xanthine oxidase inhibition by three phenols was analyzed by molecular dynamics simulation. Finally, cellular experiments confirmed that three phenols reduced uric acid levels by inhibiting the xanthine oxidase enzyme activity of BRL 3A cells.Entities:
Keywords: 1-Monopalmitin (PubChem CID: 14900); 2,6-Dihydroxyacetophenone (DHAP, PubChem CID: 69687); 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde (HBA, PubChem CID: 126); 4-Hydroxyphenethyl alcohol (4-HPEA, PubChem CID: 10393); 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF, PubChem CID: 237332); Allopurinol (AP, PubChem CID: 135401907); BRL 3A cell; Carvacrol (PubChem CID: 10364); Catechol (PubChem CID: 289); Chaenomic acid A (PubChem CID: 102339344); Daucosterol (PubChem CID: 5742590); Genistein (PubChem CID: 5280961); Isohapontigenin (PubChem CID: 5318650); Kaempferol (PubChem CID: 5280863); Luteolin (PubChem CID: 5280445); Methyl linoleate (PubChem CID: 5284421); Molecular simulation; Phenols; Piceatannol (PubChem CID: 667639); Pickled radish; Quercetin (PubChem CID: 5280343); Resveratrol (PubChem CID: 445154); Xanthine oxidase; p-coumaric acid (PubChem CID: 637542); α-Linolenic (PubChem CID: 5280934); β-Sitosterol (PubChem CID: 222284)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35634221 PMCID: PMC9136259 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem X ISSN: 2590-1575
Virtual screening results of 10 compounds and allopurinol in pickled radish with XOD as target.
| Name | Structure | Molecules Weight | Binding_Energy |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHAP | 151.14 | −6.63 | |
| 4-HPEA | 138.16 | −6.03 | |
| HBA | 126.11 | −5.63 | |
| 5-HMF | 126.11 | −4.86 | |
| α-Linolenic | 278.43 | −4.19 | |
| Methyl linoleate | 294.47 | −0.53 | |
| 1-Monopalmitin | 330.50 | >0 | |
| Chaenomic Acid A | 344.40 | >0 | |
| β-Sitosterol | 428.73 | >0 | |
| Daucosterol | 576.85 | >0 | |
| Allopurinol | 136.11 | −4.91 |
Fig. 1The conformations of the three phenolic compounds are superimposed in the active pocket of XOD (A). Binding mode of DHAP (B), 4-HPEA (C) and HBA (D) in the active site of XOD (PDB ID: 3BDJ) and the visualization of interaction between XOD and DHAP (E), 4-HPEA(F), and HBA (G).
Fig. 2(A) Inhibiting effect of phenols on pickled radish in vitro. Allopurinol was used in the positive control. DMSO was used as a solvent control. Error bars represent SD (n = 4). *** p < 0.001, (ai) Indicates the difference between sample groups (p < 0.05). (B) CD spectra of XOD in the absence and presence of DHAP, 4-HPEA and HBA. (C) Fluorescence spectroscopic analysis and the Stern-Volmer curves of XOD after radish compounds at treatment at different concentrations. indicate that the inhibitor concentration increases from small to large.
Fig. 3Root mean square deviations (RMSD) and Root mean square fluctuations (RMSF) calculation of three complexes. (A) and (D) DHAP-XOD complex, (B) and (E) 4-HPEA-XOD complex, (C) and (F) HBA-XOD complex.
Fig. 4Determination the content of uric acid produced by BRL 3A cells with different inducers and induction time. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Fig. 5Effect of three phenols on the survival rate of BRL 3A cells and evaluation of their uric acid lowering efficacy in vitro. Error bars represent SD (n = 6). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01. (a-i) indicates the difference between sample groups (p < 0.05).