Literature DB >> 31731030

Spatial configuration matters when removing windfelled trees to manage bark beetle disturbances in Central European forest landscapes.

Laura Dobor1, Tomáš Hlásny2, Werner Rammer3, Soňa Zimová1, Ivan Barka4, Rupert Seidl3.   

Abstract

Windfelled Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees play a crucial role in triggering large-scale outbreaks of the European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus. Outbreak management therefore strives to remove windfelled trees to reduce the risk of outbreaks, a measure referred to as sanitation logging (SL). Although this practice has been traditionally applied, its efficiency in preventing outbreaks remains poorly understood. We used the landscape simulation model iLand to investigate the effects of different spatial configurations and intensities of SL of windfelled trees on the subsequent disturbance by bark beetles. We studied differences between SL applied evenly across the landscape, focused on the vicinity of roads (scenario of limited logging resources) and concentrated in a contiguous block (scenario of spatially diversified management objectives). We focused on a 16 050 ha forest landscape in Central Europe. The removal of >80% of all windfelled trees is required to substantially reduce bark beetle disturbances. Focusing SL on the vicinity of roads created a "fire break effect" on bark beetle spread, and was moderately efficient in reducing landscape-scale bark beetle disturbance. Block treatments substantially reduced outbreaks in treated areas. Leaving parts of the landscape untreated (e.g., conservation areas) had no significant amplifying effect on outbreaks in managed areas. Climate change increased bark beetle disturbances and reduced the effect of SL. Our results suggest that past outbreak management methods will not be sufficient to counteract climate-mediated increases in bark beetle disturbance.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate change; Forest landscape; Process-based ecosystem modelling; Sanitation logging; Wind-bark beetle interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31731030      PMCID: PMC7612771          DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   8.910


  23 in total

Review 1.  Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology.

Authors:  Volker Grimm; Eloy Revilla; Uta Berger; Florian Jeltsch; Wolf M Mooij; Steven F Railsback; Hans-Hermann Thulke; Jacob Weiner; Thorsten Wiegand; Donald L DeAngelis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Salvage logging, ecosystem processes, and biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  D B Lindenmayer; R F Noss
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Tree species diversity mitigates disturbance impacts on the forest carbon cycle.

Authors:  Mariana Silva Pedro; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Post-disturbance recovery of forest carbon in a temperate forest landscape under climate change.

Authors:  Laura Dobor; Tomáš Hlásny; Werner Rammer; Ivan Barka; Jiří Trombik; Pavol Pavlenda; Vladimír Šebeň; Petr Štepánek; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Agric For Meteorol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 6.424

5.  Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Mart-Jan Schelhaas; Werner Rammer; Pieter Johannes Verkerk
Journal:  Nat Clim Chang       Date:  2014-09-01

6.  Searching for resilience: addressing the impacts of changing disturbance regimes on forest ecosystem services.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Thomas A Spies; David L Peterson; Scott L Stephens; Jeffrey A Hicke
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.865

7.  Climate change amplifies the interactions between wind and bark beetle disturbances in forest landscapes.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Werner Rammer
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.848

8.  Impacts of salvage logging on biodiversity: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simon Thorn; Claus Bässler; Roland Brandl; Philip J Burton; Rebecca Cahall; John L Campbell; Jorge Castro; Chang-Yong Choi; Tyler Cobb; Daniel C Donato; Ewa Durska; Joseph B Fontaine; Sylvie Gauthier; Christian Hebert; Torsten Hothorn; Richard L Hutto; Eun-Jae Lee; Alexandro B Leverkus; David B Lindenmayer; Martin K Obrist; Josep Rost; Sebastian Seibold; Rupert Seidl; Dominik Thom; Kaysandra Waldron; Beat Wermelinger; Maria-Barbara Winter; Michal Zmihorski; Jörg Müller
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.528

9.  Natural disturbances are spatially diverse but temporally synchronized across temperate forest landscapes in Europe.

Authors:  Cornelius Senf; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 13.211

10.  Patterns and drivers of recent disturbances across the temperate forest biome.

Authors:  Andreas Sommerfeld; Cornelius Senf; Brian Buma; Anthony W D'Amato; Tiphaine Després; Ignacio Díaz-Hormazábal; Shawn Fraver; Lee E Frelich; Álvaro G Gutiérrez; Sarah J Hart; Brian J Harvey; Hong S He; Tomáš Hlásny; Andrés Holz; Thomas Kitzberger; Dominik Kulakowski; David Lindenmayer; Akira S Mori; Jörg Müller; Juan Paritsis; George L W Perry; Scott L Stephens; Miroslav Svoboda; Monica G Turner; Thomas T Veblen; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 17.694

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reducing rotation age to address increasing disturbances in Central Europe: Potential and limitations.

Authors:  Soňa Zimová; Laura Dobor; Tomáš Hlásny; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Spatial configuration matters when removing windfelled trees to manage bark beetle disturbances in Central European forest landscapes.

Authors:  Laura Dobor; Tomáš Hlásny; Werner Rammer; Soňa Zimová; Ivan Barka; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 8.910

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.