Literature DB >> 35633084

Prevalence of scars: an international epidemiological survey in adults.

J M Amici1, C Taïeb2, C LeFloc'h3, A-L Demessant-Flavigny3, S Seité3, O Cogrel1,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35633084      PMCID: PMC9544440          DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   9.228


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Skin is the most vulnerable organ that is constantly exposed to potential injury, and wound healing is a vital process for the survival of all higher organisms. Scarring is most noticeable in the skin, but it also affects almost all adult mammalian and human tissues and organs. They may result from surgery, skin injury, burning or inflammatory skin diseases, such as acne, chickenpox or shingles. Scars may be extensive, dystrophic, appearing on areas not covered by clothes and considered embarrassing. They may also be associated with symptoms such as pruritus, pain or other discomforts. According to a study conducted in the United Kingdom, 26% and 44% of patients reported pain and itching related to their scars, impacting their physical comfort and functioning. Usually, scars are composed of loose fibrous connective tissue and are remodelled during healing. Chronic inflammation of the dermis and uncontrolled activation of myofibroblasts may result in abnormal scar overgrowth leading to a hypertrophic scar or a keloid with an excess of extracellular matrix proteins. Despite being common throughout the world, the epidemiology of scars has not yet been properly investigated. The aim of this international epidemiological study was to assess the prevalence of scars worldwide. The present article describes the general population with participants reporting at least one scar having appeared during the year prior to this study. Our participants were selected via a stratified random sampling method of internet users who agreed to participate in panel surveys. Data about sociodemography, presence, origin and symptoms of scars using an internet survey were collected between April and May 2020. The survey focused on the most recent scars reported in order to simplify data collection. Overall, 11 100 individuals from Brazil (2000), China (3050), France (2000), Russia (2000) and the United States (2050) answered the survey; 48.5% of subjects reported at least one scar, and in 22%, the most recent scar was less than one‐year‐old. The most often reported location of recent scars in women was the abdomen (20.4%) and face (15.9%); in men, it was the face (18.7%) and abdomen (13.2%). Significantly more men (13.3%, P < 0.00001) than women (8.4%) reported scars on their hands. For 50.8%, the origin of the most recent scar was accidental or due to a disease (women: 50.8%, men: 60.5%, P < 0.0001); 35% of women and 28% of men indicated that general or orthopaedic surgery caused the scarring (P < 0.0001). Details are given in Table 1. Overall, 12.3% of men and 10.7% of women who reported scars also reported pain (P < 0.03). Table 2 provides details about symptoms. In 2014, international guidelines on the management of scars were issued. However, these guidelines have not yet been updated. , Currently, some procedures are available to manage scars, such as intralesional injections of corticosteroids and/or 5‐fluorouracil, cryotherapy, radiotherapy, laser therapy and surgical interventions, together with additional measures such as sun protection, silicone‐based dressings or gels. , Scar management mainly consisted in the use of topical products such as healing creams (13.2%), antiseptic solutions (11.2%) or a topical antibiotic (11.9%). Medical care was significantly (P < 0.001) more frequently provided to subjects with painful scars.
Table 1

Sociodemographic data and general data about scars

GlobalMenWomen
N = 11 100N = 5486N = 5614
Age43.0 ± 14.942.8 ± 14.943.2 ± 14.9
mean ± SD
n%n%n%
Age range (years)
18–24136712.3269412.6567313.67
25–34243021.89121422.13121624.30
35–44228920.62112620.52116322.89
45–54209318.86103618.88105720.93
55–64178116.0589316.2788817.81
>65114010.275239.5361711.40
Mean number of scars ± SD 4.1 ± 4.94.0 ± 4.54.2 ± 5.0
Number of scars
< one year119622.260222.759421.7
> one year418677.8204677.3214078.3
Time since presence, if > one year (years) 12.4 ± 12.712.5 ± 13.012.3 ± 12.4
Origin of scars
Accident299255.59160460.57138850.77
General/orthopaedic surgery171231.8174127.9897135.52
Skin excision2995.561324.981676.11
Restorative/cosmetic surgery2514.661254.721264.61
Cosmetic procedure1282.38461.74823.00
Type of scars
Hyperthropic or keloid scar67112.4733512.6533612.29
Did not know189735.25189735.2594934.71

SD, standard deviation.

Table 2

Prevalence of clinical symptoms

GlobalMenWomen
n%Intensity>5 (0–10)n%Intensity>5 (0–10)n%Intensity>5 (0–10)
Presence of cracks or fissures 177432.96%10.80%96336.37%12.61%119843.82%10.80%
Visible detachment of thin skin flakes 206738.41%15.09%109441.31%17.03%73626.92%15.09%
Redness 271250.39%20.09%138952.45%21.30%119243.60%20.09%
Drought or dryness 251946.80%19.18%127948.30%20.43%124045.35%19.18%
Pruritus 244645.45%17.58%125447.36%18.73%132348.39%17.58%
Burning sensation 16313030%10.18%89533.80%12.01%97335.59%10.18%
Pulling 245345.58%18.80%125547.39%19.86%81126.66%18.80%
Sociodemographic data and general data about scars SD, standard deviation. Prevalence of clinical symptoms To our knowledge, this is the first international epidemiological survey on the prevalence, origin, location and impact of scars. Further investigations need to be performed.

Funding sources

This project was funded by La Roche Posay.

Conflict of interest

S. Seité, AL Demessant‐Flavigny and C. LeFloc'h are employees of La Roche‐Posay.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Advances in scar management: prevention and management of hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Authors:  Drew Del Toro; Raj Dedhia; Travis T Tollefson
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 2.  Wound healing and skin regeneration.

Authors:  Makoto Takeo; Wendy Lee; Mayumi Ito
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 3.  Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 1--evaluating the evidence.

Authors:  Michael H Gold; Brian Berman; Matteo Tretti Clementoni; Gerd G Gauglitz; Foad Nahai; Crystal Murcia
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 2--algorithms for scar prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Michael H Gold; Michael McGuire; Thomas A Mustoe; Andrea Pusic; Mukta Sachdev; Jill Waibel; Crystal Murcia
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 5.  Management of scars: updated practical guidelines and use of silicones.

Authors:  Sylvie Meaume; Anne Le Pillouer-Prost; Bertrand Richert; Diane Roseeuw; Javid Vadoud
Journal:  Eur J Dermatol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.328

6.  The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring.

Authors:  B C Brown; S P McKenna; K Siddhi; D A McGrouther; A Bayat
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Wound repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Gurtner; Sabine Werner; Yann Barrandon; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  In Vivo Models for the Study of Fibrosis.

Authors:  Jagannath Padmanabhan; Zeshaan N Maan; Sun Hyung Kwon; Revanth Kosaraju; Clark A Bonham; Geoffrey C Gurtner
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Wound repair and regeneration.

Authors:  J M Reinke; H Sorg
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.745

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.