| Literature DB >> 35632421 |
Thamer H Albekairi1, Abdulrahman Alshammari1, Metab Alharbi1, Amal F Alshammary2, Muhammad Tahir Ul Qamar3, Asad Ullah4, Muhammad Irfan5, Sajjad Ahmad4.
Abstract
Enterobacter hormaechei is involved in multiple hospital-associated infections and is resistant to beta-lactam and tetracycline antibiotics. Due to emerging antibiotics resistance in E. hormaechei and lack of licensed vaccine availability, efforts are required to overcome the antibiotics crisis. In the current research study, a multi-epitope-based vaccine against E. hormaechei was designed using reverse vaccinology and immunoinformatic approaches. A total number of 50 strains were analyzed from which the core proteome was extracted. One extracellular (curlin minor subunit CsgB) and two periplasmic membrane proteins (flagellar basal-body rod protein (FlgF) and flagellar basal body P-ring protein (FlgI) were prioritized for B and T-cell epitope prediction. Only three filtered TPGKMDYTS, GADMTPGKM and RLSAESQAT epitopes were used when designing the vaccine construct. The epitopes were linked via GPGPG linkers and EAAAK linker-linked cholera toxin B-subunit adjuvant was used to enhance the immune stimulation efficacy of the vaccine. Docking studies of the vaccine construct with immune cell receptors revealed better interactions, vital for generating proper immune reactions. Docked complexes of vaccine with MHC-I, MHC-II and Tool-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) reported the lowest binding energy of -594.1 kcal/mol, -706.7 kcal/mol, -787.2 kcal/mol, respectively, and were further subjected to molecular dynamic simulations. Net binding free energy calculations also confirmed that the designed vaccine has a strong binding affinity for immune receptors and thus could be a good vaccine candidate for future experimental investigations.Entities:
Keywords: E. hormaechei; antibiotics resistant; docking; molecular dynamic simulation; reverse vaccinology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35632421 PMCID: PMC9143018 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10050665
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccines (Basel) ISSN: 2076-393X
Figure 1In silico approach used for the design of multi-epitope vaccine against E. hormaechei.
Figure 2Number of proteins obtained at each step of subtractive proteomics.
Figure 3Pan-core plot of 50 strains of E. hormaechei.
Figure 4Discarded proteins having transmembrane helices (T.M.H), unstable (U.S), allergic proteins (A.P) human homologous (H.H) and normal microbiota homologous (N.M.H).
Selected proteins and predicted B-cells epitopes.
| Protein Name/Accession Number | Predicted Epitopes |
|---|---|
| >core/8236/1/Org1_Gene1515 | AAAGYDLANSEYNFAVNELSKSSFN |
| >core/5396/1/Org1_Gene1549 | HPVVGEAGPIAVPEGAEITIA |
| GSEVQRGDDDIFRLSAESQATRGPVLQADPT | |
| >core/2987/11/Org11_Gene4825 | AGAQAGGSRVQVNQLNGG |
| GTGDQTMQAPF | |
| NNVVSQPDTPLGGGQTVVVPQTDISVRDRGGSLQSVRSSTD |
Figure 5(A) Schematic representation of multi-epitope-based vaccine (B) three-dimensional structure of designed vaccine. Yellow color represents GPGPG linkers. Light green color is of cholera toxin B subunit adjuvant, while red color represents EAAAK linker.
Structural information for generated models of vaccine.
| Model | Root Mean Square | MolProbity | Clash Score | Poor Rotamers | Rama Favored | GALAXY Energy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.000 | 3.493 | 97.9 | 3.0 | 84.1 | 9003.96 |
| MODEL 1 | 0.922 | 1.471 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 92.1 | −3333.41 |
| MODEL 2 | 0.880 | 1.517 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 92.1 | −3327.95 |
| MODEL 3 | 0.882 | 1.419 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 92.1 | −3326.39 |
| MODEL 4 | 0.786 | 1.494 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 92.7 | −3318.02 |
| MODEL 5 | 0.768 | 1.494 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 92.7 | −3316.79 |
| MODEL 6 | 0.804 | 1.517 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 92.1 | −3315.93 |
| MODEL 7 | 0.829 | 1.578 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 91.5 | −3315.06 |
| MODEL 8 | 0.874 | 1.572 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 92.7 | −3312.58 |
| MODEL 9 | 0.667 | 1.396 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 92.7 | −3312.28 |
| MODEL 10 | 0.831 | 1.517 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 92.1 | −3310.59 |
Pairs of mutated amino acids, Chi3 values and energy values.
| Pairs of Amino Acid Residues | Chi3 Angle | Energy (kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|
| LEU4-TYR-33 | −74.84 | 3.02 |
| LYS5-VAL-8 | 104.11 | 4.61 |
| LEU13-LEU-29 | 118.91 | 3.55 |
| ALA17-ASN-25 | 89.76 | 2.21 |
| GLY21-ASN-25 | 91.77 | 4.63 |
| PRO23-THR-40 | −68.85 | 1.64 |
| ILE26-ILE-38 | 115.25 | 6.87 |
| LEU29-THR-36 | −108.75 | 6.36 |
| CYS30-THR-30 | −67.54 | 2.88 |
| ASN42-ILE-42 | 75.73 | 6.86 |
| PHE46-ALA-59 | 123.39 | 7.39 |
| GLU57-GLN-70 | 109.96 | 3.47 |
| GLY75-HIS-78 | 122.15 | 4.19 |
| LEU98-VAL-103 | −80.03 | 1.94 |
| ILE120-ALA-127 | 108.49 | 3.1 |
| ALA127-MET-134 | 74.1 | 6.81 |
| LYS133-TYR-136 | 105.58 | 2.38 |
| GLY141-ALA-145 | −85.33 | 6.8 |
| ALA145-THR-148 | 114.28 | 2.59 |
Figure 6(A). Wild structure of designed vaccine, (B). Mutated structure of the vaccine. Yellow color stick shows mutation by cysteine amino acid. (C). in silico cloned pET28a vector.
Figure 7(A) Secondary structure, (B) computed solubility, (C) Z-score graph and (D) Ramachandran plot.
Figure 8World and different country-wise combined MHC-I and MHC-II coverage of designed vaccine.
Figure 9Docked complex of vaccine and MHC-I (A), MHC-II (B), and TLR-4 (C) immune cell receptors.
Figure 10Statistical analysis of molecular dynamic simulation: (A) root mean square deviation (RMSD), (B) root square fluctuation (RMSF), and (C) hydrogen bonding analysis.
Computed net free binding energy of Vaccine-TLR-4, Vaccine-MHC-I and Vaccine-MHC-II complexes.
| Energy Parameter | TLR-4-Vaccine Complex | Standard Deviation | MHC-I-Vaccine Complex | Standard Deviation | MHC-II-Vaccine Complex | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| VDWAALS | −162.00 | 6.70 | −184.87 | 7.36 | −174.32 | 5.66 |
| EEL | −71.36 | 2.67 | −62.00 | 1.07 | −49.52 | 2.08 |
| Delta G gas | −233.36 | 7.25 | −246.87 | 5.41 | −223.84 | 6.43 |
| Delta G solv | 25.63 | 1.25 | 37.87 | 1.96 | 32.10 | 1.24 |
| Delta Total | −258.99 | 8.36 | −284.74 | 3.98 | −255.94 | 7.93 |
|
| ||||||
| VDWAALS | −162.00 | 6.70 | −184.87 | 7.36 | −174.32 | 5.66 |
| EEL | −71.36 | 2.67 | −62.00 | 1.07 | −49.52 | 2.08 |
| Delta G gas | −233.36 | 7.25 | −246.87 | 5.41 | −223.84 | 6.43 |
| Delta G solv | 27.57 | 0.65 | 33.10 | 2.08 | 37.02 | 3.01 |
| Delta Total | −260.93 | 7.64 | −279.97 | 5.37 | −260.86 | 9.31 |
List of interactive residues MHC-I, MHC-II, and TLR-4 receptors.
| Vaccine-Complexes | Interactive Residues |
|---|---|
|
| Ala31, Arg88, Asn65, Asn35, Ile45, Lys84, Glu32, Phe69, Met1, Tyr48, His34, Lys12, Lys3,Tyr29ser4 7, Pro140, Glu480 |
|
| Asp28, Asp91, Arg97, Ala16, Phe46, Lys44, Tyr39, His115, Tyr97, Gly121, Lys83, Gln37, Thr22, Tyr18, Lys64, Lys3, Hhis34, Glu34, Thr27, Glu32 |
|
| Asn526, Ala479, Asp379, Arg382, Lys477, Tyr451, Gln430, Ser381, Lys158, Lys420, Val338, Glu336, His334, Lys109, Lys477 |
Figure 11Different immune responses towards (MEV) against E. hormaechei. (A). Antibodies titer and (B) interferon and cytokines responses to the vaccine.