Literature DB >> 31114900

IEDB-AR: immune epitope database-analysis resource in 2019.

Sandeep Kumar Dhanda1, Swapnil Mahajan1, Sinu Paul1, Zhen Yan1, Haeuk Kim1, Martin Closter Jespersen2, Vanessa Jurtz2, Massimo Andreatta2,3, Jason A Greenbaum1, Paolo Marcatili2, Alessandro Sette1,4, Morten Nielsen2,3, Bjoern Peters1,4.   

Abstract

The Immune Epitope Database Analysis Resource (IEDB-AR, http://tools.iedb.org/) is a companion website to the IEDB that provides computational tools focused on the prediction and analysis of B and T cell epitopes. All of the tools are freely available through the public website and many are also available through a REST API and/or a downloadable command-line tool. A virtual machine image of the entire site is also freely available for non-commercial use and contains most of the tools on the public site. Here, we describe the tools and functionalities that are available in the IEDB-AR, focusing on the 10 new tools that have been added since the last report in the 2012 NAR webserver edition. In addition, many of the tools that were already hosted on the site in 2012 have received updates to newest versions, including NetMHC, NetMHCpan, BepiPred and DiscoTope. Overall, this IEDB-AR update provides a substantial set of updated and novel features for epitope prediction and analysis.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31114900      PMCID: PMC6602498          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


INTRODUCTION

The adaptive immune system in vertebrates can recognize a large repertoire of antigens from a broad spectrum of pathogens. B and T cell receptors are responsible for recognizing these diverse set of antigens and triggering immune responses. The specific regions recognized on these antigens by B and T cell receptors are termed as epitopes. Thus, understanding the mechanism of immune receptor:epitope interactions is important in developing diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines against infectious and autoimmune diseases, cancers and allergies. The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) captures experiments that identify and characterize epitopes and epitope specific immune receptors along with various other details such as host organism, immune exposures, and induced immune responses (1). A companion site, IEDB-Analysis Resource (IEDB-AR), hosts various B and T cell epitope prediction tools based on algorithms trained and validated on the IEDB data along with epitope analysis tools. Since the last update, the number of monthly users visiting the IEDB-AR has more than tripled from under 1,500 in 2012 to over 4,500 in 2018 (Supplementary Figure S1). New epitope prediction and analysis tools are regularly added in the IEDB-AR with features to advance epitope-based therapeutics and vaccine development (2). For example, a tool to reduce undesired immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins was implemented recently (3). Here, we describe the newly implemented tools (Table 1), updates to the previously existing tools, and novel functionalities that have been added since the last report in the 2012 NAR webserver edition (4).
Table 1.

New and updated tools in the IEDB-AR

CategoryNameUpdate typeKey featuresPurpose
T cellTepiToolNew toolInteractive and easy to use tool for immunologistsPrediction of T cell epitopes.
MHC-NPNew toolUses binding and ligand elution data to train the model.Prediction of naturally processed ligands for MHC class I.
MHCII-NPNew toolUses motif informations in the ligand elution dataset from IEDBPrediction of naturally processed ligands for MHC class II.
ImmunogenicityNew toolUses properties and position of amino acids to predict immunogenicityPredicting immunogenicity for MHC-class I epitopes.
CD4EpiScoreNew toolCombines the prediction from immunogenicity and MHC binding algorithmsPredicting CD4 T cell reactivity in human population.
DeimmunizationNew toolPredicts non-immunogenic regions based on reduced binding to a set of reference MHC II allelesIdentification of immunogenic regions and suggested amino acid substitutions to reduce immunogenicity.
B cell / T cellLYRANew toolEasy to use and fast antibody and TCR structure prediction.Template-based 3D structure modeling of B- and T-cell receptors.
B cellBepiPred2.0New versionTraining on conformational epitope dataset using random forest algorithmPrediction of linear B-cell epitopes.
DiscoTope2.0New versionNovel spatial neighborhood and surface exposure definitions.Prediction of discontinuous B-cell epitopes.
Analysis toolsRATENew toolInfers HLA restriction by generating a matrix of subjects and given immune responseInferring allele restriction for epitopes based on immune response data from HLA-typed subjects.
ImmunomeBrowserNew toolUser specified epitopes and source proteins.Aggregating and mapping the immune response from heterogeneous epitope data to source proteins.
Cluster2.0Re-engineeredMultiple clustering methods and visualization.Grouping and visualizing peptides similar in sequence.
New and updated tools in the IEDB-AR

T CELL EPITOPE PREDICTION TOOLS

A total of 6 new tools were added in the category of T cell epitope prediction. These include TepiTool, a T cell peptide:MHC binding prediction tool with a new user-friendly interface, tools for prediction of naturally processed MHC class I and class II ligands, deimmunization of therapeutic proteins and prediction of T cell immunogenicity beyond MHC binding affinity. In addition to the newly added tools, many of the previously existing tools have been re-trained and updated as more data were made available. The latest versions of the prediction methods in T cell epitope prediction tools are listed in Table 2. While the latest versions are provided as the default methods, many of the tools allow the user to select previous versions where available. The newly added tools are described briefly in the following sections.
Table 2.

Methods and versions available in the IEDB T cell epitope prediction tools

MHC classPrediction methodVersions availableReference
MHC class IIEDB consensus (Recommendeda)2.18 (default)Moutaftsi et al. (22)
NetMHCpan4.0 (default), 3.0, 2.8Jurtz et al. (23)
NetMHC (also called ANN)4.0 (default), 3.4Andreatta and Nielsen (24)
SMMPMBEC1.0Kim et al. (25)
SMM1.0Peters and Sette (26)
Comblib_sidney20081.0Sidney et al. (27)
PickPocket1.1Zhang et al. (28)
NetMHCcons1.1Karosiene et al. (29)
netMHCstabpan1.0Rasmussen et al. (30)
MHC IIIEDB consensus (Recommendeda)2.17Wang et al. (31)
NetMHCIIpan3.1Andreatta et al. (32)
NN-align2.2Nielsen and Lund (33)
SMM-align1.1Nielsen et al. (34)
Combinatorial Library1.0Sidney et al. (27)
Sturniolo1.0Sturniolo et al. (35)

aRecommended methods can change based on regular benchmarking evaluations.

Methods and versions available in the IEDB T cell epitope prediction tools aRecommended methods can change based on regular benchmarking evaluations.

TepiTool

TepiTool (http://tools.iedb.org/tepitool) (5) is a new interface for IEDB T cell epitope predictions and is designed as a step-by-step wizard combining both MHC class I and class II prediction methods. The tool provides recommended default values at each step for the prediction and selection of an optimal set of peptides for a given application. TepiTool also offers additional functionalities that go beyond binding predictions. For example, conservancy analysis of peptides among the input sequences and different options for selecting the top-predicted peptides. Once the prediction task is finished, the user is provided with a concise set of top-predicted peptides and links to download the complete prediction results and conservancy estimates. The prediction results and links are also emailed to the user, if an email address is provided.

Prediction of naturally processed ligands for MHC class I and class II

MHC-NP (http://tools.iedb.org/mhcnp) (6) is a tool for predicting peptides that are naturally processed by the MHC class I pathway and bind to MHC class I molecules. The tool can predict MHC I ligands for six human and two mouse MHC alleles. Similarly, MHCII-NP (http://tools.iedb.org/mhciinp) (7) is a tool for predicting naturally processed MHC II ligands. These tools were developed by training on the naturally processed peptides eluted from MHC molecules.

Immunogenicity

This new tool (http://tools.iedb.org/immunogenicity) is intended to classify peptides that bind to MHC class I (pMHC) into two categories: epitopes and non-epitopes (8). It is based on an analysis of amino acid composition of the peptide at non-anchor positions, where the side chains of amino acids are likely to be in contact with the TCR.

CD4EpiScore

CD4EpiScore (http://tools.iedb.org/cd4episcore) is a new tool for predicting the immunogenicity of CD4-restricted peptides in human populations that utilizes a neural network to identify patterns associated with immunogenicity (9). It has been validated on a series of independent datasets reported in the literature for different ethnicities and diverse antigens using a variety of experimental approaches.

Deimmunization

The Deimmunization tool (http://tools.iedb.org/deimmunization) was added to IEDB-AR to address the issue of undesired immune reactivity to therapeutically important proteins. In a stepwise wizard, this tool makes use of the class II peptide:MHC binding prediction tools to predict potentially immunogenic regions in protein sequences and suggest amino acid substitutions to reduce their immunogenicity (3). As a proof-of-concept, the tool has been validated experimentally on recombinant factor VIIa (Vatreptacog alpha), which was discontinued from clinical trials due to immunogenicity issues (10).

B CELL EPITOPE PREDICTION TOOLS

The IEDB-AR hosts linear B cell epitope prediction tools, such as BepiPred (11), various amino acid physicochemical property based scales (http://tools.iedb.org/bcell/), and discontinuous B cell epitope prediction tools, such as DiscoTope (http://tools.iedb.org/discotope/) (12) and ElliPro (http://tools.iedb.org/ellipro/) (13). Since the last update of IEDB-AR, the recommended B cell epitope prediction methods, BepiPred (14) and DiscoTope (15), were updated to their 2.0 versions.

LYRA

A new tool named LYRA (Lymphocyte Receptor Automated Modelling) was added to model the 3D structures of B and T cell receptors (16). The LYRA tool (http://tools.iedb.org/lyra/) predicts the structure of B- and T-cell receptors from their amino acid sequence. Using homology modelling, it selects the best framework templates and, if necessary, models the complementary determining regions (CDRs) based on the predicted canonical structure (17) of each loop, which are then grafted onto the framework templates. The results page shows the aligned sequence and a visualization of the structure allowing for quick inspection of the CDRs in both sequence and structure.

ANALYSIS TOOLS

The analysis section of IEDB-AR contains tools that automate common tasks when working with sets of epitopes or epitope-candidates. Updates to this section include a revised version of epitope clustering along with a new tool to map epitopes to source proteins, and a tool to infer allele restrictions of epitopes from immune response data on HLA-typed subjects.

Cluster2.0

The epitope clustering tool (http://tools.iedb.org/cluster2) has been completely re-engineered to group peptidic epitopes based on their sequence similarity. In addition to providing three different clustering approaches, this new version also supports interactive graphical visualizations of the clusters to show connectivity among peptides (18).

ImmunomeBrowser

The ImmunomeBrowser tool in the IEDB website maps epitopes to their source antigen and provides a visualization of the observed immune responses across all tested regions of the protein. In a new customizable version of this tool (http://tools.iedb.org/immunomebrowser/), we have extended this application to perform a similar analysis for user-provided datasets of epitopes and source antigens (19).

Restrictor Analysis Tool for Epitopes (RATE)

RATE (http://tools.iedb.org/rate) (20) is an automated method that can computationally infer the HLA restrictions of epitopes, given large datasets of T cell responses in HLA typed subjects. The tool takes two inputs, the alleles expressed by the subjects and the immune response of the peptides in the subjects. It then calculates the odds ratios for each allele being the restricting allele for a specific peptide and estimates significance using Fisher's exact test. The tool was developed with a focus on class II alleles but can also be applied to class I alleles.

NEW FEATURES IN THE IEDB-AR

In addition to implementing new tools, IEDB-AR development since 2012 has also targeted improvements that address how users want to interact with the tools. Two of the most readily apparent and prevalent new features are the ability to submit prediction jobs for processing in the background and the architectural changes made at the hardware and software levels to improve stability and support parallelization.

Background batch job processing

With the release of version 2.17 of the IEDB-AR in June 2017, users were given the ability to provide an email address upon submission of a class I or class II peptide binding prediction job. This enhancement has allowed users to run larger prediction jobs (in terms of the number of input sequences and predicted alleles) than would be possible directly through the web interface. Upon completion of the job, results are sent as an email attachment to the user. Since the initial implementation, this feature has been added to TepiTool and the Deimmunization tool - both of which are computationally intensive and could timeout with a reasonable-sized request through the web interface. For tools that support batch processing, it is available through the web interface as well as the API.

Hardware & software architectural changes to improve stability and support parallelization

Several architectural changes have been made to the hardware and software in order to decouple the front-end from the back-end, improve stability, and support parallelization of several tools. At the hardware level, a separate job-processing cluster was created to run all CPU-intensive tasks, such as binding predictions. These machines are physically separated from the web server so that heavy processing has little effect on web site performance. To make use of the redesigned server architecture, the backend software was completely reengineered in Python and Django with special attention to make use of a message queuing system (RabbitMQ) and task manager (Celery). With this integrated system in place, it has allowed parallelization of jobs for several of the resource tools with speedups as great as 15-fold over the single-threaded version. It has also enabled efficient use of resources and prioritization of jobs based upon their origins. As an example, a separate resource queue has been configured in collaboration with the Griffith lab to support the CPU-intensive requests of their pVAC-Seq pipeline (21) while keeping the IEDB systems responsive to requests from other users.

AVAILABILITY OF THE TOOLS

IEDB application programming interface (IEDB-API)

In addition to the main web interface, public-facing APIs are made available for several of the tools hosted at the IEDB-AR. Included among these tools are the MHC class I and class II binding and processing predictions, MHC-NP, and the B cell linear epitope predictor. To provide a consistent experience, each of the APIs adhere to a similar interface, with parameter names shared among them where possible. All of the APIs work via HTTP POST requests and return responses in plain text. The MHC class I and II binding prediction APIs are very heavily utilized, accounting for over 300,000 predictions each month and upward of 90% of the jobs run through the IEDB-AR.

Software distribution packages

While the goal of the public IEDB-AR server is to accommodate as many prediction jobs as reasonably possible, resources can be limiting for extremely large requests. This is one of the many reasons that the IEDB-AR team provides downloadable packages to run the predictions locally on the user hardware. Currently, 8 different standalone packages are available, covering the most widely used tools, and new packages are developed based upon user demand and available resources. Additionally, a complete virtual machine image of the IEDB-AR is made available to external entities through license agreements. These two modes of distribution cover a broad range of use cases, enabling users to run many of the IEDB-AR tools on their own hardware and in complete privacy. Click here for additional data file.
  35 in total

1.  Generation of tissue-specific and promiscuous HLA ligand databases using DNA microarrays and virtual HLA class II matrices.

Authors:  T Sturniolo; E Bono; J Ding; L Raddrizzani; O Tuereci; U Sahin; M Braxenthaler; F Gallazzi; M P Protti; F Sinigaglia; J Hammer
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Prediction of residues in discontinuous B-cell epitopes using protein 3D structures.

Authors:  Pernille Haste Andersen; Morten Nielsen; Ole Lund
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  The PickPocket method for predicting binding specificities for receptors based on receptor pocket similarities: application to MHC-peptide binding.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Ole Lund; Morten Nielsen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  A consensus epitope prediction approach identifies the breadth of murine T(CD8+)-cell responses to vaccinia virus.

Authors:  Magdalini Moutaftsi; Bjoern Peters; Valerie Pasquetto; David C Tscharke; John Sidney; Huynh-Hoa Bui; Howard Grey; Alessandro Sette
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06-11       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  NN-align. An artificial neural network-based alignment algorithm for MHC class II peptide binding prediction.

Authors:  Morten Nielsen; Ole Lund
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  ElliPro: a new structure-based tool for the prediction of antibody epitopes.

Authors:  Julia Ponomarenko; Huynh-Hoa Bui; Wei Li; Nicholas Fusseder; Philip E Bourne; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Generating quantitative models describing the sequence specificity of biological processes with the stabilized matrix method.

Authors:  Bjoern Peters; Alessandro Sette
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Improved method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes.

Authors:  Jens Erik Pontoppidan Larsen; Ole Lund; Morten Nielsen
Journal:  Immunome Res       Date:  2006-04-24

9.  Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method.

Authors:  Morten Nielsen; Claus Lundegaard; Ole Lund
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Quantitative peptide binding motifs for 19 human and mouse MHC class I molecules derived using positional scanning combinatorial peptide libraries.

Authors:  John Sidney; Erika Assarsson; Carrie Moore; Sandy Ngo; Clemencia Pinilla; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters
Journal:  Immunome Res       Date:  2008-01-25
View more
  83 in total

Review 1.  Epitope prediction and identification- adaptive T cell responses in humans.

Authors:  John Sidney; Bjoern Peters; Alessandro Sette
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 11.130

2.  The Human Immunopeptidome Project: A Roadmap to Predict and Treat Immune Diseases.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Peter Kubiniok; Kevin A Kovalchik; Qing Ma; Jérôme D Duquette; Ian Mongrain; Eric W Deutsch; Bjoern Peters; Alessandro Sette; Isabelle Sirois; Etienne Caron
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Vaxign-ML: supervised machine learning reverse vaccinology model for improved prediction of bacterial protective antigens.

Authors:  Edison Ong; Haihe Wang; Mei U Wong; Meenakshi Seetharaman; Ninotchka Valdez; Yongqun He
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Structural Prediction of Peptide-MHC Binding Modes.

Authors:  Marta A S Perez; Michel A Cuendet; Ute F Röhrig; Olivier Michielin; Vincent Zoete
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Evaluating performance of existing computational models in predicting CD8+ T cell pathogenic epitopes and cancer neoantigens.

Authors:  Paul R Buckley; Chloe H Lee; Ruichong Ma; Isaac Woodhouse; Jeongmin Woo; Vasily O Tsvetkov; Dmitrii S Shcherbinin; Agne Antanaviciute; Mikhail Shughay; Margarida Rei; Alison Simmons; Hashem Koohy
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 13.994

6.  Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Reactive CD4 + T Cells.

Authors:  Benjamin J Meckiff; Ciro Ramírez-Suástegui; Vicente Fajardo; Serena J Chee; Anthony Kusnadi; Hayley Simon; Alba Grifoni; Emanuela Pelosi; Daniela Weiskopf; Alessandro Sette; Ferhat Ay; Grégory Seumois; Christian H Ottensmeier; Pandurangan Vijayanand
Journal:  SSRN       Date:  2020-07-07

7.  Identification and Characterization of CD4+ T Cell Epitopes after Shingrix Vaccination.

Authors:  Alessandro Sette; Alba Grifoni; Hannah Voic; Rory D de Vries; John Sidney; Paul Rubiro; Erin Moore; Elizabeth Phillips; Simon Mallal; Brittany Schwan; Daniela Weiskopf
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Can molecular mimicry explain the cytokine storm of SARS-CoV-2?: An in silico approach.

Authors:  Gustavo Obando-Pereda
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 20.693

Review 9.  Bioinformatic HLA Studies in the Context of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and Review on Association of HLA Alleles with Preexisting Medical Conditions.

Authors:  Mina Mobini Kesheh; Sara Shavandi; Parastoo Hosseini; Rezvan Kakavand-Ghalehnoei; Hossein Keyvani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Integrated Core Proteomics, Subtractive Proteomics, and Immunoinformatics Investigation to Unveil a Potential Multi-Epitope Vaccine against Schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Abdur Rehman; Sajjad Ahmad; Farah Shahid; Aqel Albutti; Ameen S S Alwashmi; Mohammad Abdullah Aljasir; Naif Alhumeed; Muhammad Qasim; Usman Ali Ashfaq; Muhammad Tahir Ul Qamar
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.