| Literature DB >> 35630539 |
María F Beer1,2, Guillermo F Reta1, Adrián Puerta3, Augusto E Bivona4,5, Andrés Sánchez Alberti4,6, Natacha Cerny5,6, Emilio L Malchiodi4,5,6, Carlos E Tonn1, José M Padrón3, Valeria P Sülsen2,7, Osvaldo J Donadel1.
Abstract
Cancer is one of the most important causes of death worldwide. Solid tumors represent the vast majority of cancers (>90%), and the chemotherapeutic agents used for their treatment are still characterized by variable efficacy and toxicity. Sesquiterpenes are a group of natural compounds that have shown a wide range of biological activities, including cytotoxic and antiparasitic activity, among others. The antiproliferative activity of natural sesquiterpenes, tessaric acid, ilicic acid, and ilicic alcohol and their semisynthetic derivatives against HeLa, T-47D, WiDr, A549, HBL-100, and SW1573 cell lines were evaluated. The effect of the compounds on Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes was also assessed. The selectivity index was calculated using murine splenocytes. Derivatives 13 and 15 were the most antiproliferative compounds, with GI50 values ranging between 5.3 (±0.32) and 14 (±0.90) μM, in all cell lines tested. The presence of 1,2,3-triazole groups in derivatives 15-19 led to improvements in activity compared to those corresponding to the starting natural product (3), with GI50 values ranging between 12 (±1.5) and 17 (±1.1) μM and 16 being the most active compound. In relation to the anti-T. cruzi activity, derivatives 7 and 16 obtained from tessaric acid and ilicic acid were among the most active and selective compounds with IC50 values of 9.3 and 8.8 µM (SI = 8.0 and 9.4), respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Asteraceae; Trypanosoma cruzi; antiproliferative activity; ilicic acid; ilicic alcohol; sesquiterpenes; tessaric acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35630539 PMCID: PMC9143450 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27103067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Natural compounds used in antimalarial therapy, artemisinin and mevastatin.
Figure 2Structures of natural sesquiterpene tessaric acid (1), ilicic acid (2), and ilicic alcohol (3).
Figure 3Structures of sesquiterpene derivative obtained from tessaric acid (1), ilicic acid (2), and ilicic alcohol (3).
Scheme 1Synthesis of compounds 4–9.
Scheme 2Synthesis of compounds 10–15.
Scheme 3Synthesis of azide 20.
Scheme 4Synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles 16–19.
Antiproliferative activity (GI50, µM) of the natural sesquiterpenes 1–3 and their derivatives 4–19 against human solid tumor cells.
| Compound | Cell Line | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A549 | HBL-100 | HeLa | SW1573 | T-47D | WiDr | |
|
| n.e. | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| n.e. | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| n.e. | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| 68 (±0.12) | >100 | 68 (±9.5) | 57 (±5.7) | 95 (±6.6) | 98 (±3.5) |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| 33 (±5.2) | 61 (±0.11) | 36 (±6.5) | 40 (±7.4) | 30 (±4.8) | 44 (±2.8) |
|
| 27 (±0.33) | 41 (±0.14) | 19 (±1.7) | 30 (±0.25) | 22 (±4.4) | 37 (±3.6) |
|
| 27 (±1.7) | 37 (±1.7) | 31 (±1.7) | 30 (±1.7) | 27 (±1.7) | 30 (±1.7) |
|
| 28 (±0.29) | 47 (±0.75) | 24 (±0.56) | 30 (±0.29) | 21 (±0.22) | 39 (±0.29) |
|
| 31 (±5.5) | 64 (±1.5) | 37 (±5.3) | 50 (±1.0) | 36 (±5.3) | 45 (±5.8) |
|
| 20 (±3.8) | 33 (±3.2) | 19 (±3.3) | 33 (±2.4) | 23 (±2.3) | 29 (±3.1) |
|
| 22 (±2.4) | 20 (±1.5) | 17 (±5.6) | 27 (±7.4) | 20 (±2.4) | 24 (±5.4) |
|
| 5.3 (±0.32) | 13 (±2.2) | 8.0 (±0.1) | 11 (±0.8) | 11 (±1.0) | 11 (±1.7) |
|
| 22 (±4.0) | 20 (±3.2) | 17 (±1.8) | 27 (±5.6) | 23 (±2.6) | 20 (±4.7) |
|
| 13 (±2.1) | 19 (±1.6) | 14 (±1.4) | 17 (±2.0) | 19 (±1.0) | 18 (±1.7) |
|
| n.e. | n.e. | 13 (±2.2) | n.e. | 17 (±1.1) | 12 (±1.5) |
|
| n.e. | n.e. | 31 (±2.1) | n.e. | 29 (±1.8) | 31 (±9.8) |
|
| n.e. | n.e. | >100 | n.e. | 44 (±8.2) | 39 (±1.2) |
|
| n.e. | n.e. | 79 (±5.0) | n.e. | 61 (±3.2) | 41 (±0.2) |
|
| 4.9 (±0.2) | 1.9 (±0.2) | 1.8 (±0.5) | 2.7 (±0.4) | 17 (±0.5) | 23 (±4.3) |
n.e.: not evaluated.
Figure 4Range plot of antiproliferative activity for compounds 1–19. Bars represent the range between minimal and maximal GI50 values (Table 1).
Cytotoxic activity of the natural sesquiterpenes and its derivatives on spleen cells (CC50, µM) and selectivity indexes (SI) on tumor cells.
| Compound | Splenocytes | Cell Lines | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A549 | HBL-100 | HeLa | SW1573 | T-47D | WiDr | ||
|
| 329.4 (±12.9) | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
|
| >839 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
|
| >792.6 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
|
| 17.3 (±1.1) | 0.25 | n.d. | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
|
| 44.7 (±6.7) | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
|
| 103.6 (±0.8) | 3.1 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 3.5 | 2.4 |
|
| 38.1 (±7.8) | 1.4 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.0 |
|
| 19.8 (±2.0) | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
|
| 76.5 (±15.9) | 2.7 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.0 |
|
| 78.2 (±5.3) | 2.5 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
|
| 333.5 (±4.2) | 16.7 | 10.1 | 17.6 | 10.1 | 14.5 | 11.5 |
|
| 64.3 (±8.5) | 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 2.7 |
|
| 27.4 (±2.8) | 5.2 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
|
| >404.8 | >18.4 | >20.2 | >24 | >20.2 | >17 | >20 |
|
| 21.5 (±10.2) | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
|
| 82.4 (±0.02) | n.d. | n.d. | 6.3 | n.d. | 4.8 | 6.8 |
|
| 40.4 (±10.4) | n.d. | n.d. | 1.3 | n.d. | 1.4 | 1.3 |
|
| 62.2 (±13.7) | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 1.4 | 1.6 |
|
| 186.8 (±0.01) | n.d. | n.d. | 2.4 | n.d. | 3.1 | 4.6 |
n.d.: not determined.
Figure 5Effect of the natural sesquiterpene tessaric acid (1), ilicic acid (2), and ilicic alcohol (3) and their derivatives on T. cruzi. Epimastigotes (RA strain) were cultured in the presence of the compounds (50–1.5 µg/mL). Determinations were performed by triplicate. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD. (A) Effect of tessaric acid and derivatives on epimastigotes; (B) Effect of ilicic acid and derivatives on epimastigotes; (C) Effect of ilicic alcohol and derivatives on epimastigotes.
Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi activity of the natural and semisynthetic sesquiterpenes and selectivity indexes. Results are expressed as 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) ± SD.
| Compound | IC50 (µM) | Selectivity Index |
|---|---|---|
|
| >201.4 | n.d. |
|
| >198.1 | n.d. |
|
| 156.5 (±4.81) | n.d. |
|
| 16.3 (±1.36) | 1.1 |
|
| 9.3 (±0.89) | 4.8 |
|
| >100.3 | n.d. |
|
| 4.7 (±0.16) | 8.0 |
|
| 63.2 (±2.00) | 0.3 |
|
| 45.1 (±8.24) | 1.7 |
|
| 19.6 (±0.92) | 4.0 |
|
| 26.1 (±1.67) | 12.6 |
|
| 8.0 (±0.4) | 8.0 |
|
| 59.6 (±6.95) | 0.5 |
|
| >101.1 | n.d. |
|
| 22.4 (±0.91) | 1.0 |
|
| 8.8 (±0.24) | 9.4 |
|
| 14.8 (±0.69) | 2.7 |
|
| 30.2 (±5.22) | 2.1 |
|
| 48.2 (±5.40) | 3.9 |
n.d.: not determined.