| Literature DB >> 35628403 |
Cuihong Fan1,2,3, Zhaojia Wu1,2, David M L Cooper4, Adam Magnus4, Kim Harrison4, B Frank Eames4, Rajni Chibbar5, Gary Groot6, Junqiong Huang7, Harald Genth8, Jun Zhang3, Xing Tan3, Yulin Deng3, Jim Xiang1,2.
Abstract
Simulated microgravity (SMG) inhibits osteoblast differentiation (OBD) and induces bone loss via the inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. However, the mechanism by which SMG alters the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is unknown. We previously demonstrated that SMG altered the focal adhesion kinase (FAK)-regulated mTORC1, AMPK and ERK1/2 pathways, leading to the inhibition of tumor cell proliferation/metastasis and promoting cell apoptosis. To examine whether FAK similarly mediates SMG-dependent changes to Wnt/β-catenin in osteoblasts, we characterized mouse MC3T3-E1 cells cultured under clinostat-modeled SMG (µg) conditions. Compared to cells cultured under ground (1 g) conditions, SMG reduces focal adhesions, alters cytoskeleton structures, and down-regulates FAK, Wnt/β-catenin and Wnt/β-catenin-regulated molecules. Consequently, protein-2 (BMP2), type-1 collagen (COL1), alkaline-phosphatase activity and matrix mineralization are all inhibited. In the mouse hindlimb unloading (HU) model, SMG-affected tibial trabecular bone loss is significantly reduced, according to histological and micro-computed tomography analyses. Interestingly, the FAK activator, cytotoxic necrotizing factor-1 (CNF1), significantly suppresses all of the SMG-induced alterations in MC3T3-E1 cells and the HU model. Therefore, our data demonstrate the critical role of FAK in the SMG-induced inhibition of OBD and bone loss via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, offering FAK signaling as a new therapeutic target not only for astronauts at risk of OBD inhibition and bone loss, but also osteoporotic patients.Entities:
Keywords: ALP activity; CNF1; FAK; SMG; Wnt/β-catenin; bone density; hindlimb unloading model; micro-CT; mineralization; osteoblast
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35628403 PMCID: PMC9146119 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23105593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Measurement of cytoskeleton structures and focal adhesions of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured under different conditions. MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured in chamber slides under 1 g (A,D), μg (B,E) and μg + CNF1 (C,F). The cells on slides were stained with (A–C) FITC-phalloidin (green) and (D–F) anti-paxillin antibody (green). Slides were then covered with cover slips using Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent with DAPI (blue) and analyzed for microfilament (green) and focal adhesions (green), respectively, by fluorescence microscopy using 40× objectives (formation of cellular focal adhesions, white arrows). The average numbers of cellular focal adhesions per 40× field were measured by using ImageJ software. Data represent the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 versus different groups by using Student t test. One representative experiment of two is shown.
Figure 2Analysis of FAK and Wnt/β-catenin-regulated gene signaling and β-catenin nuclear localization in MC3T3-E1 cells cultured under different conditions. (A) Cell lysates prepared from MC3T3-E1 cells cultured in flasks under 1 g, μg and μg + CNF1 were subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis, respectively. Proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes and blotted with indicated antibodies. Western blot band signals were quantified by chemiluminescence. Densitometric values were normalized for matching GAPDH controls. Data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. * p < 0.05 versus different groups by Student t test. (B) β-catenin nuclear localization analysis. MC3T3-E1 cells grown on chamber slides were covered using Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent with DAPI (blue) and observed by confocal microscopy. The percentages of β-catenin nuclear localization were measured by using ImageJ software. Data represent the mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01 versus different groups by using Student t test. One representative experiment of two is shown.
Figure 3Assessment of ALP activity and mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cells cultured under different conditions. (A) Lysates of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured in flasks under 1 g, μg and μg + CNF1, respectively, were subjected to ALP activity analysis. Data represent the mean of a triplet ± SD in three experiments. * p < 0.05 versus different groups by Student t test. (B) MC3T3-E1 cells cultured in chamber slides under 1 g, μg and μg + CNF1, respectively. The cells on slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and then stained for 30 min with Alizarin red at 37 °C, followed by measurement of Alizarin-red-stained calcified nodules (mineralization) by light microscopy. The calcified nodules per 40× field were measured by using ImageJ software. Data represent the mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01 versus different groups by using Student t test. One representative experiment of two is shown.
Figure 4Measurement of mouse proximal trabecular structures by micro-CT imaging in HU-treated (n = 5), HU + CNF1-treated (n = 4) and control (n = 8) mice. (A–F) Micro-CT showed that HU-treated mice had significantly less trabecular bone formation than the control mice and that HU+CNF1-treated mice effectively converted HU-inhibited trabecular bone formation. (G–I) Bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular number (Tb.N) all significantly decreased in tibias of HU-treated mice compared to control mice, and activation of FAK restored HU-affected trabecular bone formation. Scale bar: 1 mm. Data represent the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 versus different groups by Student t test.
Figure 5Measurement of mouse proximal trabecular structures by histology in HU-treated (µg), HU+CNF1-treated (µg + CNF1) and control (1 g) mice. Compared to the control group, H/E bone sections of HU-treated (µg) mouse tibias showed significantly thinner trabecular structures than control (1 g) mice; and administration of CNF1 converted HU-affected trabecular bone formation in HU-CNF1-treated (µg + CNF1) mice. Black arrows represent trabecular bone structures. Magnification: 20×. One representative bone sample of three to four is shown.
Figure 6Schematic diagram presenting how SMG inhibits focal adhesions and down-regulates FAK signaling, leading to inhibition of osteoblast differentiation and bone loss via Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and activation of FAK signaling by CNF1-converted, SMG-affected osteoblast differentiation and bone loss via Wnt/β-catenin pathway.