| Literature DB >> 35627645 |
Emmanuel Cohen1,2, Norbert Amougou1, Amandine Ponty1, Margaux Guerrien1, Wakilongo Wakenge1, Glory Chidumwa2, Rihlat Said-Mohamed2,3, Léopold K Fezeu4, Patrick Pasquet1.
Abstract
In the context of rapid nutritional transitions in Africa, few studies have analyzed the etiology of obesity by considering the driver pathways that predict body mass index (BMI). The aim of this study is to innovatively identify these driver pathways, including the main sociodemographic and socioecological drivers of BMI. We conducted a rural-urban quantitative study in Cameroon (n = 1106; balanced sex ratio) to explore this issue. We recruited participants and reported several sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., marital status, socioeconomic status (SES), and ethnicity). We then assessed three main socioecological drivers of BMI (body weight perception, dietary intake, and physical activity) and conducted bioanthropometric measurements. We identified several driver pathways predicting BMI. In Cameroon, Bamiléké ethnicity, higher SES, being married, and older age had positive effects on BMI through overweight valorization and/or dietary intake. Accordingly, we found that being Bamiléké, married, and middle-aged, as well as having a higher SES, were factors that constituted at-risk subgroups overexposed to drivers of obesity. As such, this study highlights the necessity of investigating the complex driver pathways that lead to obesity. Therefore, better identification of the subgroups at risk for obesity will help in developing more targeted population health policies in countries where this burden is a major public health issue.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; Cameroon; determinants; driver pathways; nutritional transition
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35627645 PMCID: PMC9141336 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19106108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Characteristics of the studied population 1.
| Ethnicity | Rural Béti | Rural Bamiléké | Urban Béti | Urban Bamiléké | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men |
| 120 | 124 | 142 | 140 |
| Age | 42 ± 14 b-x | 41 ± 14 x-x | 38 ± 14 b-x | 38 ± 14 x-x | |
| SES (low) % | 91 c-x | 93 c-x | 22 c-c | 12 c-c | |
| SES (high) % | 9 c-x | 7 c-x | 78 c-c | 88 c-c | |
| Marital status % | |||||
| Married | 53 c-x | 56 x-x | 37 c-c | 60 x-c | |
| Single/cohabiting | 47 a-x | 44 x-x | 63 a-c | 40 x-c | |
| Educational level % | |||||
| None or Primary | 43 c-c | 63 c-c | 18 c-c | 40 c-c | |
| High school/university | 57 c-c | 37 c-c | 82 c-c | 60 c-c | |
| Women |
| 110 | 130 | 164 | 176 |
| Age | 38 ± 13 | 39 ± 13 | 36 ± 13 | 37 ± 13 | |
| SES (low) % | 91 c-x | 92 c-x | 27 c-x | 32 c-x | |
| SES (high) % | 9 c-x | 8 c-x | 72 c-x | 68 c-x | |
| Marital status % | |||||
| Married | 66 a-x | 64 x-x | 77 a-x | 62 x-x | |
| Single/cohabiting | 34 a-x | 36 x-x | 23 a-b | 38 x-b | |
| Educational level % | |||||
| None or Primary | 62 c-x | 63 c-x | 42 c-x | 48 c-x | |
| High school/university | 38 c-x | 37 c-x | 58 c-x | 52 c-x |
1 Design and age-adjusted by linear regression analyses. Values for age are expressed as means ± SD (standard deviation) and were tested with linear regression models. Values for categorical variables are expressed as percentages (%) and were tested using chi-squared tests. a < 0.05; b < 0.01; c < 0.001; x = not significant (NS). The rural–urban ethnic comparisons followed this order: rural Béti vs. urban Béti (1st superscript in column 1 and 3); rural Bamiléké vs. urban Bamiléké (1st superscript in column 2 and 4); rural Béti vs. rural Bamiléké (2nd superscript in column 1 and 2); and urban Béti vs. urban Bamiléké (2nd superscript in column 3 and 4).
Figure 1Perceptions of body size on masculine BSS. The diamonds just below the silhouettes correspond to the BMI averages of the four populations (rural Béti, urban Béti, rural Bami, and urban Bami). CBS: current body size; DBS: desired body size; IBS: ideal body size. ANCOVA between the four samples: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Differences between CBS and DBS were tested using unpaired t-tests, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2Perceptions of body size on feminine BSS. The diamonds just below the silhouettes correspond to the BMI averages of the four populations (rural Béti, urban Béti, rural Bami, and urban Bami). CBS: current body size; DBS: desired body size, IBS: ideal body size. ANCOVA between the four samples: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Differences between CBS and DBS were tested using unpaired t-tests, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Energy values from 24-h recall and physical activity means between Béti and Bamiléké in rural and urban areas 1.
| Ethnicity | Rural Béti | Rural Bamiléké | Urban Béti | Urban Bamiléké | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men |
| 120 | 126 | 143 | 140 |
| Energy value (Mega Joule) | 7.53 ± 0.94 x-b | 9.69 ± 0.62 a-b | 8.57 ± 1.17 x-c | 12.15 ± 0.92 a-c | |
| Intense physical activity (H) | 2.28 ± 0.07 b-c | 1.23 ± 0.04 b-c | 1.03 ± 0.08 b-b | 0.40 ± 0.07 b-b | |
| Moderate physical activity (H) | 1.50 ± 0.18 x-b | 2.07 ± 0.12 b-b | 1.66 ± 0.22 x-b | 1.81 ± 0.19 b-b | |
| Walking activity (H) | 1.58 ± 0.12 a-c | 1.83 ± 0.08 a-c | 0.83 ± 0.15 a-c | 1.23 ± 0.12 a-c | |
| Sedentary behavior (H) | 3.34 ± 0.15 b-c | 5.54 ± 0.10 c-c | 4.44 ± 0.19 b-c | 6.41 ± 0.15 c-c | |
| Women |
| 110 | 132 | 164 | 179 |
| Energy value (Mega Joule) | 5.65 ± 0.01 b-c | 9.25 ± 0.23 c-c | 6.69 ± 0.14 b-c | 10.50 ± 0.11 c-c | |
| Intense physical activity (H) | 1.31 ± 0.01 b-b | 0.91 ± 0.05 b-b | 0.29 ± 0.03 b-b | 0.14 ± 0.03 b-b | |
| Moderate physical activity (H) | 1.59 ± 0.01 b-c | 2.33 ± 0.07 c-c | 1.82 ± 0.05 b-c | 2.39 ± 0.04 c-c | |
| Walking activity (H) | 1.29 ± 0.01 b-c | 1.44 ± 0.07 c-c | 0.75 ± 0.05 b-b | 0.83 ± 0.04 c-b | |
| Sedentary behavior (H) | 3.03 ± 0.01 a-c | 6.50 ± 0.20 a-c | 3.78 ± 0.12 a-c | 6.03 ± 0.09 a-c |
1 Design and age-adjusted by linear regression analyses. Values are expressed as means ± SD (standard deviation). H: hours. Linear regression models were used to test the differences between the four samples: a < 0.05; b < 0.01; c < 0.001; x = not significant (NS). The rural–urban ethnic comparisons followed this order: rural Béti vs. urban Béti (1st superscript in column 1 and 3); rural Bamiléké vs. urban Bamiléké (1st superscript in column 2 and 4); rural Béti vs. rural Bamiléké (2nd superscript in column 1 and 2); and urban Béti vs. urban Bamiléké (2nd superscript in column 3 and 4).
Biometrics between Béti and Bamiléké in rural and urban areas 1.
| Ethnicity | Rural Béti | Rural Bamiléké | Urban Béti | Urban Bamiléké | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative analysis for men |
| 120 | 126 | 143 | 140 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.80 ± 0.65 a-c | 24.21 ± 0.43 a-c | 23.46 ± 0.82 a-c | 26.76 ± 0.64 a-c | |
| Underweight (%) | 10 c-c | 2 x-c | 5 c-c | 2 x-c | |
| Normal weight (%) | 76 c-c | 66 c-c | 63 c-c | 37 c-c | |
| Overweight (%) | 12 c-c | 26 c-c | 29 c-c | 40 c-c | |
| Obesity (%) | 2 x-b | 6 c-b | 3 x-c | 21 c-c | |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 77.12 ± 1.82 a-c | 84.18 ± 1.20 a-c | 80.52 ± 2.27 a-c | 89.97 ± 1.79 a-c | |
| No abdominal obesity | 98 x-x | 96 c-x | 97 x-c | 84 c-c | |
| Abdominal obesity | 2 x-x | 4 c-x | 3 x-c | 16 c-c | |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 88.80 ± 1.30 a-b | 94.44 ± 0.86 a-b | 92.74 ± 1.62 a-b | 100.39 ± 1.28 a-b | |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.87 ± 0.01 x-a | 0.89 ± 0.01 x-a | 0.86 ± 0.01 x-a | 0.89 ± 0.01 x-a | |
| No abdominal obesity | 99 x-x | 97 a-x | 98 x-a | 94 a-a | |
| Abdominal obesity | 1 x-b | 3 c-b | 2 x-c | 6 c-c | |
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | 91.42 ± 2.25 x-a | 95.78 ± 1.49 a-a | 92.96 ± 2.82 x-b | 100.23 ± 2.22 a-b | |
| No hypertension | 53 a-c | 36 a-c | 40 a-c | 28 a-c | |
| Hypertension | 47 c-c | 64 a-c | 60 c-c | 72 a-c | |
| Comparative analysis for women |
| 110 | 132 | 164 | 179 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.56 ± 0.03 c-c | 26.82 ± 0.46 b-c | 24.97 ± 0.26 c-c | 29.04 ± 0.19 b-c | |
| Underweight (%) | 6 x-c | 0 x-c | 5 x-a | 2 x-a | |
| Normal weight (%) | 65 c-c | 42 c-c | 53 c-c | 27 c-c | |
| Overweight (%) | 18 c-c | 37 x-c | 28 c-x | 30 x-x | |
| Obesity (%) | 11 a-c | 21 c-c | 14 a-c | 41 c-c | |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 80.56 ± 0.12 a-c | 89.51 ± 1.28 x-c | 81.89 ± 0.72 a-c | 91.07 ± 0.53 x-c | |
| No abdominal obesity | 81 c-c | 46 x-c | 67 c-c | 44 x-c | |
| Abdominal obesity | 19 c-c | 54 x-c | 33 c-c | 56 x-c | |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 94.07 ± 0.11 a-b | 103.04 ± 1.24 a-b | 98.15 ± 0.70 a-c | 108.09 ± 0.51 a-c | |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.86 ± 0.01 a-a | 0.87 ± 0.01 b-a | 0.83 ± 0.01 a-b | 0.84 ± 0.01 b-b | |
| No abdominal obesity | 60 a-a | 51 a-a | 50 a-a | 40 a-a | |
| Abdominal obesity | 40 a-a | 49 c-a | 50 a-b | 60 c-b | |
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | 88.06 ± 0.03 a-a | 91.27 ± 1.13 a-a | 90.34 ± 0.71 a-b | 96.26 ± 0.53 a-b | |
| No hypertension | 62 x-x | 58 c-x | 58 x-c | 39 c-c | |
| Hypertension | 38 x-x | 42 c-x | 42 x-c | 61 c-c |
1 Design and age-adjusted by linear regression analyses. Values for continuous variables are expressed as means ± SD (Standard Deviation). Linear regression models were used for continuous variables. Values for categorical variables are expressed as percentages (%) and were tested by Chi-squared tests. a < 0.05; b < 0.01; c < 0.001; x = not significant (NS). The rural–urban ethnic comparison followed this order: rural Béti vs. urban Béti (1st superscript in column 1 and 3); rural Bamiléké vs. urban Bamiléké (1st superscript in column 2 and 4); rural Béti vs. rural Bamiléké (2nd superscript in column 1 and 2); and urban Béti vs. urban Bamiléké (2nd superscript in column 3 and 4). BMI: underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2); normal weight (18.5–24.9), overweight (25–29.9), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2); Abdominal obesity: waist circumference > 88 cm (women), > 102 cm (men); WHR > 0.85 (women), > 0.90 (men); Hypertension: diastolic BP ≥ 90 and/or systolic BP ≥ 14.0.
Figure 3Association between the prevalence of overweight and migration status in Béti and Bamiléké, adjusted by age. The respective original value of each prevalence in Bamiléké was: 8% (n = 41); 8% (n = 47); 14% (n = 81); 16% (n = 95); 7% (n = 44); and 3% (n = 20). The respective original value of each prevalence in Béti was: 3% (n = 12); 5% (n = 26); 6% (n = 30); 7% (n = 40); 4% (n = 21); and 5% (n = 30). The p values to test the differences between Bamiléké and Béti (ethnicity), and the differences among Bamiléké and Béti are presented in the upper right.
Figure 4Results of structural equation modeling (SEM) showing associations between sociodemographic/socioecological predictors and body mass index in men. Continuous lines are direct sociodemographic effects and dotted lines are indirect sociodemographic effects. Bold lines (continuous and dotted) represent statistically significant paths. Simple lines (continuous and dotted) represent statistically non-significant paths.
Figure 5Results of structural equation modeling (SEM) showing associations between sociodemographic/socioecological predictors and body mass index in women. Continuous lines are direct sociodemographic effects and dotted lines are indirect sociodemographic effects. Bold lines (continuous and dotted) represent statistically significant paths. Simple lines (continuous and dotted) represent statistically non-significant paths.