| Literature DB >> 35626998 |
Hongyan Lu1,2, Li Fang1,2, Xiyan Wang1,2, Dan Wu1,2, Chunlei Liu1,2, Xiaoting Liu1,2, Ji Wang1,2, Yawen Gao1,2, Weihong Min1,2.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the structure-activity relationship of the pine nut antioxidant peptide WYPGK and its derivative peptides, and to evaluate the protective effect of the latter on oxidative damage to mitochondrial structure and function in PC12 cells. Molecular docking revealed the derivative peptides WYFGK and WYSGK to have higher affinity to the active region of sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) (-6.08 kcal/mol and -5.87 kcal/mol, respectively), hence indicating that they are promising SIRT3 inducers and antioxidant factors. The derivative peptide WYSGK presented the highest ORAC value (5457.70 µmol TE/g), ABTS scavenging activity (70.05%), and Fe2+-chelating activity (81.70%), followed by WYPGK and WYFGK. Circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance data suggested that the presence of 3-Ser in WYSGK increased its β-sheet content, and that the active hydrogen atoms produced chemical shifts. In H2O2-induced PC12 cells, WYSGK substantially reduced ROS and MDA levels, and increased ATP levels. Transmission electron microscopy and Seahorse Analyze assay proved the peptide WYSGK to significantly alleviate mitochondrial damage and respiratory dysfunction (p < 0.05), thereby implying that a study of structure-activity relationships of the peptides can possibly be an effective approach for the development of functional factors.Entities:
Keywords: active peptides; antioxidative activity; mitochondrial function; molecular docking; structure-activity relationship
Year: 2022 PMID: 35626998 PMCID: PMC9140850 DOI: 10.3390/foods11101428
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Binding energy of pine nut-derived peptides docking with SIRT3.
| Number | Sequence | Binding Energy (kcal/mol) | Hydrogen Bonds Number | π-π Interactions Number | Intermolecular Energy (kcal/mol) | Internal Energy (kcal/mol) | Torsional Energy (kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WYDGK | −3.59 | 8 | 1 | −10.75 | −3.66 | 7.16 |
| 2 | WYEGK | −1.44 | 4 | 1 | −8.90 | −3.99 | 7.46 |
| 3 | WYKGK | −1.94 | 6 | 1 | −9.69 | −4.41 | 7.76 |
| 4 | WYRGK | −3.95 | 8 | - | −11.41 | −1.76 | 7.46 |
| 5 | WYHGK | −3.64 | 3 | - | −10.50 | −6.53 | 6.86 |
| 6 | WYGGK | −4.34 | 6 | - | −10.60 | −3.63 | 6.26 |
| 7 | WYAGK | −4.29 | 6 | - | −10.56 | −6.42 | 6.26 |
| 8 | WYLGK | −4.32 | 4 | - | −11.18 | −2.36 | 6.86 |
| 9 | WYIGK | −5.37 | 5 | - | −12.23 | −4.31 | 6.86 |
| 10 | WYVGK | −5.40 | 2 | - | −11.96 | −6.08 | 6.56 |
| 11 | WYFGK | −6.08 | 4 | - | −12.94 | −5.29 | 6.86 |
| 12 | WYPGK | −4.66 | 2 | - | −10.63 | −6.75 | 5.97 |
| 13 | WYMGK | −4.84 | 5 | 1 | −12.00 | −4.12 | 7.16 |
| 14 | WYWGK | −5.16 | 5 | - | −12.03 | −5.93 | 6.86 |
| 15 | WYSGK | −5.87 | 6 | 1 | −12.73 | −6.07 | 6.86 |
| 16 | WYQGK | −4.97 | 4 | - | −12.13 | −5.75 | 7.16 |
| 17 | WYTGK | −4.72 | 6 | - | −11.58 | −4.66 | 6.86 |
| 18 | WYCGK | −5.18 | 2 | - | −12.04 | −4.36 | 6.86 |
| 19 | WYNGK | −4.73 | 8 | - | −11.59 | −5.11 | 6.86 |
| 20 | WYYGK | −3.43 | 2 | - | −10.59 | −4.18 | 7.16 |
Figure 1The molecular docking mode of (A) WYPGK, (B) WYFGK and (C) WYSGK with SIRT3. The yellow dashed lines stand for hydrogen bonds. The interaction between peptides and the residues of the binding sites in SIRT3 are shown using a 2 D diagram by LigPlus software. (D) WYPGK, (E) WYFGK and (F) WYSGK.
Figure 2Antioxidant activity assay of WYPGK, WYFGK, and WYSGK. (A) ORAC assay; (B) ABTS radical scavenging activity; (C) Fe2+ chelating activity. Data are presented as means ± SD from three replicates. Different letters denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3CD and NMR spectroscopy analysis of WYPGK and WYSGK. (A) CD spectra; (B) secondary structure analysis; the 1H NMR spectroscopy of (C) WYPGK and (D) WYSGK; COSY-NOESY NMR fingerprinting of (E) WYPGK and (F) WYSGK. ** indicates statistically significant differences (p < 0.01).
Figure 4Effects of WYPGK and WYSGK on (A) ROS level; (B) MDA level; (C) ATP level; (D) mitochondrial structure and morphology; (E) mitochondrial aspect ratio. Representative quantitative results of mitochondrial length with 10 mitochondria per experiment. Data are presented as means ± SD from three replicates. Different letters denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Effects of WYSGK on the cellular oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR). Mitochondrial energy metabolism was measured using a Seahorse XF8 extracellular flux analyzer. The mitochondrial (A) OCR curve, (B) basal respiration, (C) ATP production, (D) proton leak, (E) maximal respiration, and (F) spare respiratory capacity. The mitochondrial (G) ECAR curve, (H) glycolysis, (I) glycolysis capacity, and (J) glycolysis reserve. Data are presented as means ± SD from three replicates. Different letters denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).