| Literature DB >> 35625892 |
Xiaohong Huang1,2, Heng-Wei Cheng2,3.
Abstract
Nutrients and xenobiotics cross the blood-placenta barrier, potentially depositing in the fetal brain. The prenatal exposure affects the neuroendocrine and microbial development. The mechanism underlying maternal risk factors reprograming the microbiota-gut-brain axis with long-term effects on psychosocial behaviors in offspring is not clear. In humans, it is not possible to assess the nutrient or xenobiotic deposition in the fetal brain and gastrointestinal system for ethical reasons. Moreover, the maternal-fetal microbe transfer during gestation, natural labor, and breast-feeding constitutes the initial gut microbiome in the progeny, which is inevitable in the most widely utilized rodent models. The social predisposition in precocial birds, including chickens, provides the possibility to test behavioral responses shortly after being hatched. Hence, chickens are advantageous in investigating the ontogenetic origin of behaviors. Chicken embryos are suitable for deposition assessment and mechanistic study due to the accessibility, self-contained development, uniform genetic background, robust microbiota, and easy in vivo experimental manipulation compared to humans and rodents. Therefore, chicken embryos can be used as an alternative to the rodent models in assessing the fetal exposure effect on neurogenesis and investigating the mechanism underlying the ontogenetic origin of neuropsychiatric disorders.Entities:
Keywords: chicken embryo; maternal–fetal medicine; microbiota–gut–brain axis; neurodevelopmental disorders; nonclinical safety study; psychosocial dysfunction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35625892 PMCID: PMC9138209 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10051155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1Schematic diagram illustrating the maternal metabolic fluctuations reprogramming neuropsychiatric development in offspring. Nutrients and xenobiotics may deposit in the fetal central nervous system and gastrointestinal system and consequentially reprogram the development and activity of the microbiota–gut–brain axis. These alterations act alone and integrally with potential to cause neuropsychiatric disorders in offspring. The central nervous system and gastrointestinal system have been recognized as the core battery system and secondary system by the International Council on Harmonization guideline S5 (R2) for safety assessment in maternal–fetal medicine [25].
Figure 2Schematic diagram summarizing the prenatal and postnatal events affecting the gut microbiome during offspring development. The maternal–fetal microbe transfer during 40-week pregnancy, natural labor, and breast-feeding constitutes the initial microbiome in offspring. Multiple environmental factors, including food intake, disease, and drug administration, during postnatal life alter the gut microbiota composition and diversity. Moreover, the disease state and medical history affect the neuroendocrine, reciprocally interacting with gut microbiota via the microbiota–gut–brain axis. The color represents the time sequence of the events that occur during the lifespan.
A comparative summary among human, rodent, and chicken models in investigating ontogenetic mental health problems.
| Species | Human | Rodent | Chicken |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advantages |
Closed to the clinical decisions Equipped with placenta |
Accessibility Approachable prenatal development Equipped with placenta Developing modern mechanistic approaches have been applied Genetically engineered mouse models available |
Accessibility Time- and cost-saving High reproducibility providing sufficient sample size for statistical power Precise litter size Accurate developmental stages Large embryos with a uniform genetic background Easy in vivo experimental manipulation with the availability of a number of techniques Self-sustained development |
| Disadvantages |
Ethical issues Maternal metabolism influence Maternal microbe transfer Single time-point detection |
Sacrifice of the female parent Unprecise and small litter size Small embryos Hard to predict the embryonic stage Maternal metabolism influence Maternal microbe transfer Time-consuming and high cost |
Lack of placenta Lack of developing modern mechanistic approaches Lack of genetically engineered models |