| Literature DB >> 35624718 |
Cristina Scomoroscenco1,2, Mircea Teodorescu2, Sabina Georgiana Burlacu1, Ioana Cătălina Gîfu1, Catalin Ionut Mihaescu1, Cristian Petcu1, Adina Raducan3, Petruta Oancea3, Ludmila Otilia Cinteza3.
Abstract
Curcumin, due to its antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antitumoral activity, has attracted huge attention in applications in many fields such as pharmacy, medicine, nutrition, cosmetics, and biotechnology. The stability of curcumin-based products and preservation of antioxidant properties are still challenges in practical applications. Stability and antioxidant properties were studied for curcumin encapsulated in O/W microemulsion systems and three related gel microemulsions. Only biodegradable and biocompatible ingredients were used for carriers: grape seed oil as oily phase, Tween 80, and Plurol® Diisostearique CG as a surfactant mix, and ethanol as a co-solvent. For the gel microemulsions, water-soluble polymers, namely Carbopol® 980 NF, chitosan, and sodium hyaluronate were used. The influence of UVC irradiation and heat treatment on the degradation kinetics of curcumin in the formulations was studied. Because of the antioxidant character of the microemulsion oily phase, the possibility of a synergistic effect between grape seed oil and curcumin was explored. In this study, the high efficiency of the studied drug delivery systems to ensure protection from external degradative factors was confirmed. Also, the influence of the encapsulation in microemulsion and derived gel microemulsion systems on the antioxidant capacity curcumin was studied, and a synergistic effect with vegetal oil was demonstrated.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; curcumin; grape seed oil; microemulsion; synergism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624718 PMCID: PMC9137544 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11050854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Sample ID and amount of curcumin encapsulated in each of the samples.
| Sample ID | Encapsulating System/Solvent | Amount of Curcumin in Sample (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| M1 | Ethanol | 3.95 |
| ME | Microemulsion | 10.13 |
| SM | Polyglyceryl-3 Diisostearate:Tween 80 weight ratio 1:3 (surfactant mixture) | 10.6 |
| OP | Grape seed oil (oily phase of ME) | 0.28 |
| gME-CP | Gel microemulsion with Carbopol® 980 NF | 10.13 |
| gME-SH | Gel microemulsion with sodium hyaluronate | 10.13 |
| gME-CT | Gel microemulsion with chitosan | 10.13 |
Figure 1Visual aspect of microemulsion and gel microemulsion with sodium hyaluronate (see Table 1) with and without encapsulated CURC.
Figure 2Size and size distribution for void microemulsion (a) and curcumin encapsulating microemulsion (b).
The amount of curcumin degraded after 2 h, after exposure at UVC, 37 °C, and 80 °C.
| Sample ID | Degraded Curcumin (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| UVC (254 nm) | 80 °C | 37 °C | |
| M1 | 19.47 | 26.32 | 17.95 |
| SM | 16.80 | 16.12 | 4.12 |
| OP | 0.12 | 0.43 | 0 |
| ME | 4.03 | 4.71 | 0 |
| gME-CP | 0 | 3.69 | 0 |
| gME-SH | 1.54 | 3.52 | 0 |
| gME-CT | 0 | 8.50 | 0 |
Figure 3Evolution of the DPPH solution absorbance for CURC encapsulated in various microemulsion systems and reference solvent mixtures (sample denoted in Table 1).
Figure 4IC50 values of CURC encapsulated in microemulsion, gel microemulsions systems, and reference solvent mixtures (sample denoted in Table 1). (*) statisticaly significant (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Reduced amount of DPPH, for CURC encapsulated in various microemulsion systems (at 1% concentration) and reference solvent mixtures (sample denoted in Table 1) determined at equilibrium (time = 900 s). (*) statisticaly significant (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Variation of the % ESC for individual components Grape seed oil (a) and for curcumin (b) at various concentrations equivalent to concentrations at the selected grape seed oil-curcumin mixtures investigated for synergistic effect, at different ratio (v/v): C1 corresponds to 10:1 (v/v) ratio; C2 corresponds to 4.5:10 (v/v) ratio; C3 corresponds to 1:1 (v/v) ratio; C4 corresponds to 1:5 (v/v) ratio; C5 corresponds to 1:10 (v/v) ratio.
Figure 7Variation of experimental scavenging activity toward DPPH with antioxidant concentration (solid lines represent the best fit of Equation (5) to experimental data).
Synergistic effect (SE) and experimental scavenging capacity (% ESC) of antioxidant mixtures at 30 s and 900 s.
| Oil:Curcumin Solution (0.5 wt.% in Ethanol) | t1 = 30 s | t2 = 900 s | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % ESC1 | % TSC1 | SE1 | % ESC2 | % TSC2 | SE2 | |
| 1:10 | 85.37 ± 0.04 | 83.37 ± 0.05 | * 1.024 ± 0.001 | 89.41 ± 0.04 | 90.37 ± 0.06 | 0.989 ± 0.001 |
| 1:5 | 82.45 ± 0.07 | 80.77 ± 0.18 | * 1.020 ± 0.002 | 89.86 ± 0.02 | 90.55 ± 0.04 | 0.992 ± 0.005 |
| 1:1 | 76.10 ± 0.01 | 71.70 ± 0.07 | * 1.061 ± 0.002 | 91.39 ± 0.07 | 93.81 ± 0.11 | 0.974 ± 0.016 |
| 4.5:1 | 60.92 ± 0.36 | 58.09 ± 0.37 | * 1.048 ± 0.027 | 90.79 ± 0.48 | 90.13 ± 0.51 | 1.007 ± 0.023 |
| 10:1 | 45.76 ± 0.28 | 43.99 ± 0.21 | * 1.041 ± 0.009 | 89.29 ± 0.39 | 84.68 ± 0.56 | * 1.054 ± 0.025 |
Theoretical scavenging capacity (TSC) was calculated from data for single components (see Figure 6); * Asterisks denote a significant difference compared with the respective experimental value (p < 0.05).