Literature DB >> 28689056

Patient navigation for lung cancer screening in an urban safety-net system: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.

David E Gerber1, Heidi A Hamann2, Noel O Santini3, Suhny Abbara4, Hsienchang Chiu5, Molly McGuire6, Lisa Quirk7, Hong Zhu8, Simon J Craddock Lee9.   

Abstract

The National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated improved lung cancer mortality with annual low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening, leading to lung cancer screening endorsement by the United States Preventive Services Task Force and coverage by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Adherence to annual CT screens in that trial was 95%, which may not be representative of real-world, particularly medically underserved populations. This pragmatic trial will determine the effect of patient-focused, telephone-based patient navigation on adherence to CT-based lung cancer screening in an urban safety-net population. 340 adults who meet standard eligibility for lung cancer screening (age 55-77years, smoking history≥30 pack-years, quit within 15years if former smoker) are referred through an electronic medical record-based order by physicians in community- and hospital-based primary care settings within the Parkland Health and Hospital System in Dallas County, Texas. Eligible patients are randomized to usual care or patient navigation, which addresses adherence, patient-reported barriers, smoking cessation, and psycho-social concerns related to screening completion. Patients complete surveys and semi-structured interviews at baseline, 6-month, and 18-month follow-ups to assess attitudes toward screening. The primary endpoint of this pragmatic trial is adherence to three sequential, prospectively defined steps in the screening protocol. Secondary endpoints include self-reported tobacco use and other patient-reported outcomes. Results will provide real-world insight into the impact of patient navigation on adherence to CT-based lung cancer screening in a medically underserved population. This study was registered with the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT02758054) on April 26, 2016.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Lung cancer screening; Navigation; Patient reported outcomes; Pragmatic trial; Smoking cessation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28689056      PMCID: PMC7066861          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  66 in total

1.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Kate M Brett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Computed tomography screening for lung cancer without a smoking cessation program--not a cost-effective idea.

Authors:  W K Evans; Michael C Wolfson
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies.

Authors:  Denise F Polit; Cheryl Tatano Beck
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 5.837

4.  Constructing qualitatively derived theory: concept construction and concept typologies.

Authors:  Janice M Morse
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2004-12

5.  Tailored lay health worker intervention improves breast cancer screening outcomes in non-adherent Korean-American women.

Authors:  Hae-Ra Han; H Lee; M T Kim; K B Kim
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2008-05-07

6.  Mixture models for the joint distribution of repeated measures and event times.

Authors:  J W Hogan; N M Laird
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Continuum of mammography use among US women: classification tree analysis.

Authors:  Annie Gjelsvik; Michelle L Rogers; Melissa A Clark; Hernando C Ombao; William Rakowski
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2014-07

8.  Screening for major depression in cancer outpatients: the diagnostic accuracy of the 9-item patient health questionnaire.

Authors:  Parvez Thekkumpurath; Jane Walker; Isabella Butcher; Laura Hodges; Annet Kleiboer; Mark O'Connor; Lucy Wall; Gordon Murray; Kurt Kroenke; Michael Sharpe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Patient navigation to improve follow-up of abnormal mammograms among disadvantaged women.

Authors:  Sanja Percac-Lima; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Anne Marie McCarthy; Sorbarikor Piawah; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Anxiety, fear of cancer, and perceived risk of cancer following lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Margaret M Byrne; Joel Weissfeld; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.

Authors:  James R Rogers; Junghwan Lee; Ziheng Zhou; Ying Kuen Cheung; George Hripcsak; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  The use of mobile technology and peer navigation to promote adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivorship care: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jacqueline N Casillas; Lindsay F Schwartz; Catherine M Crespi; Patricia A Ganz; Katherine L Kahn; Margaret L Stuber; Roshan Bastani; Faisal Alquaddomi; Deborah L Estrin
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 3.  Multilevel Opportunities to Address Lung Cancer Stigma across the Cancer Control Continuum.

Authors:  Heidi A Hamann; Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve; Lisa Carter-Harris; Jamie L Studts; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Implementation and Uptake of Rural Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Tri Le; Stacie Miller; Emily Berry; Sarah Zamarripa; Aurelio Rodriguez; Benjamin Barkley; Asha Kandathil; Cecelia Brewington; Keith E Argenbright; David E Gerber
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Prevalence And Impact of Medical Comorbidities in A Real-World Lung Cancer Screening Population.

Authors:  Harris Majeed; Hong Zhu; Sarah A Williams; Heidi A Hamann; Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu; Jessica Lee; Noel O Santini; Travis Browning; Tanushree Prasad; Joyce O Adesina; Minh Do; David Balis; Juana Gamarra de Willams; Ellen Kitchell; David H Johnson; Simon J Craddock Lee; David E Gerber
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.840

6.  Tracking the Nonenrolled: Lung Cancer Screening Patterns Among Individuals not Accrued to a Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Heidi A Hamann; Claudia Chavez; Olivia Dorsey; Noel O Santini; Travis Browning; Cristhiaan D Ochoa; Joyce Adesina; Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu; Eric Steen; Hong Zhu; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Stakeholder engagement to initiate lung cancer screening in an urban safety-net health system.

Authors:  Simon J Craddock Lee; Heidi A Hamann; Travis Browning; Noel O Santini; Suhny Abbara; David S Balis; Hsienchang Chiu; Brett A Moran; Molly McGuire; David E Gerber
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2019-08-31

Review 8.  Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.

Authors:  Nicola Lindson; Gillian Pritchard; Bosun Hong; Thomas R Fanshawe; Andrew Pipe; Sophia Papadakis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.