Literature DB >> 35622161

Minimum 2-year results of the second-generation CFR-PEEK locking plate on the proximal humeral fracture.

Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra1, Karol Szewczyk2, Alexander Ellwein2, Robert Blach2, Gunnar Jensen2, Andreas Kühnapfel3, Helmut Lill2, Mara Warnhoff2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the 24-month range of motion results of patients treated with CFR-PEEK2 versus conventional titanium plate osteosyntheses (TAL-P). We hypothesized similar clinical outcomes but a better range of motion in the CFR-PEEK2 group than the TAL-P group in the 2-year follow-up.
METHODS: This retrospective study analysing prospectively collected data included all patients that presented with a PHF and were treated with CFR-PEEK2 between November 2016 and April 2018. Follow-up was performed after a minimum of 24 months, evaluating the functional degree of movement functional scores, including the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) as well as an age- and sex-adapted Constant-Murley score (CMS). The 2-year results were compared to the results of a matched pair group comprising patients that were treated with TAL-P during the same period.
RESULTS: Of the 35 patients included (mean age: 61.2 [18-78] years), 30 (86%) patients completed the 24-month follow-up in the CFR-PEEK2-group. After 24 months, the mean CMS was 89.9 points (pt) (44.5-100 pt) and the mean SSV was 86.7% (35-100%). Compared to the matched-pair TAL-P cohort, the 24-month follow-up showed similar results (CMS: 88.6 pt. (40.5-100 pt.) [p = 0.9]; SSV: 76% (30-100%) [p = 0.05]). However, significantly better degrees of forward flexion and internal rotation as well as a better range of motion in abduction was recorded in patients treated with CFR-PEEK2 plates than TAL-P.
CONCLUSION: At the 24-month follow-up, patients who received treatment with CFR-PEEK2 compared to those that received TAL-P showed enhanced range of motion whilst having similar clinical scores.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PEEK; Proximal Humeral Fracture; Shoulder Surgery; Titanium Alloy Locking Plate; Trauma

Year:  2022        PMID: 35622161     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03298-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  20 in total

1.  Unexpected high complication rate following internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures with an angled blade plate.

Authors:  Reinhard A Meier; Peter Messmer; Pietro Regazzoni; Wolfram Rothfischer; Thomas Gross
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fractures: Primary Arthroplasty Versus Secondary Arthroplasty After Failed Proximal Humeral Locking Plate Fixation.

Authors:  Emilio Sebastia-Forcada; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Román Cebrian-Gomez; Francisco A Miralles-Muñoz; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates.

Authors:  Juan Agudelo; Matthias Schürmann; Philip Stahel; Peter Helwig; Steven J Morgan; Wolfgang Zechel; Christian Bahrs; Anand Parekh; Bruce Ziran; Allison Williams; Wade Smith
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Crispin C Ong; Michael Walsh; Laith M Jazrawi; Nirmal C Tejwani; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Latest Trends in the Current Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures - an Analysis of 1162 Cases at a Level-1 Trauma Centre with a Special Focus on Shoulder Surgery.

Authors:  Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra; Robert Maximilian Blach; Alexander Ellwein; Jan Christoph Katthagen; Helmut Lill; Gunnar Jensen
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 0.923

6.  Complication rate after operative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: locking plate osteosynthesis versus proximal humeral nail.

Authors:  Greta Lorenz; Wolfgang Schönthaler; Wolfgang Huf; Micha Komjati; Christian Fialka; Sandra Boesmueller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Failure and revision rates of proximal humeral fracture treatment with the use of a standardized treatment algorithm at a level-1 trauma center.

Authors:  Jan Christoph Katthagen; Meret Huber; Svenja Grabowski; Alexander Ellwein; Gunnar Jensen; Helmut Lill
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-18

8.  High risk for revision after shoulder arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Marc Randall Kristensen; Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussen; Brian Elmengaard; Steen Lund Jensen; Bo Sanderhoff Olsen; Stig Brorson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Failure after proximal humeral fracture osteosynthesis: a one year analysis of hospital-related healthcare cost.

Authors:  Jan Dauwe; Gregory Walters; Lukas A Holzer; Kris Vanhaecht; Stefaan Nijs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Age-Independent Clinical Outcome in Proximal Humeral Fractures: 2-Year Results Using the Example of a Precontoured Locking Plate.

Authors:  Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra; Johanna Illner; Karol Szewczyk; Mara Warnhoff; Alexander Ellwein; Robert Maximillian Blach; Helmut Lill; Gunnar Jensen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.