Literature DB >> 35622124

Metabolomic profiling of Spathaspora passalidarum fermentations reveals mechanisms that overcome hemicellulose hydrolysate inhibitors.

Cleilton Santos Lima1,2, Thiago Neitzel3,4, Renan Pirolla3, Leandro Vieira Dos Santos5,6, Jaciane Lutz Lenczak7, Inês Conceição Roberto8, George J M Rocha9,10.   

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms involved in tolerance to inhibitors is the first step in developing robust yeasts for industrial second-generation ethanol (E2G) production. Here, we used ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) and MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for analysis of MS data to examine the changes in the metabolic profile of the yeast Spathaspora passalidarum during early fermentation of hemicellulosic hydrolysates containing high or low levels of inhibitors (referred to as control hydrolysate or CH and strategy hydrolysate or SH, respectively). During fermentation of SH, the maximum ethanol production was 16 g L-1 with a yield of 0.28 g g-1 and productivity of 0.22 g L-1 h-1, whereas maximum ethanol production in CH fermentation was 1.74 g L-1 with a yield of 0.11 g g-1 and productivity of 0.01 g L-1 h-1. The high level of inhibitors in CH induced complex physiological and biochemical responses related to stress tolerance in S. passalidarum. This yeast converted compounds with aldehyde groups (hydroxymethylfurfural, furfural, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, syringaldehyde, and vanillin) into less toxic compounds, and inhibitors were found to reduce cell viability and ethanol production. Intracellularly, high levels of inhibitors altered the energy homeostasis and redox balance, resulting in lower levels of ATP and NADPH, while that of glycolytic, pentose phosphate, and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle pathways were the most affected, being the catabolism of glucogenic amino acids, the main cellular response to inhibitor-induced stress. This metabolomic investigation reveals interesting targets for metabolic engineering of ethanologenic yeast strains tolerant against multiple inhibitors for E2G production. KEY POINTS: • Inhibitors in the hydrolysates affected the yeast's redox balance and energy status. • Inhibitors altered the glycolytic, pentose phosphate, TCA cycle and amino acid pathways. • S. passalidarum converted aldehyde groups into less toxic compounds.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethanol; Hemicellulosic hydrolysate; Inhibitors; Metabolic profiling; Spathaspora passalidarum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35622124     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-11987-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  31 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and physiological basis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tolerance to adverse lignocellulose-based process conditions.

Authors:  Joana T Cunha; Aloia Romaní; Carlos E Costa; Isabel Sá-Correia; Lucília Domingues
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced tolerance to hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass.

Authors:  María P Almario; Luis H Reyes; Katy C Kao
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Physiological response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to weak acids present in lignocellulosic hydrolysate.

Authors:  Zhongpeng Guo; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Metabolomic study of interactive effects of phenol, furfural, and acetic acid on Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ming-Zhu Ding; Xin Wang; Yang Yang; Ying-Jin Yuan
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2011-10

5.  A rapid and reliable method for metabolite extraction in yeast using boiling buffered ethanol.

Authors:  B Gonzalez; J François; M Renaud
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.239

6.  Expression of a glutamate decarboxylase homologue is required for normal oxidative stress tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S T Coleman; T K Fang; S A Rovinsky; F J Turano; W S Moye-Rowley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Efficient fermentation of xylose to ethanol at high formic acid concentrations by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Tomohisa Hasunuma; Kyung-mo Sung; Tomoya Sanda; Kazuya Yoshimura; Fumio Matsuda; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Mode of antimicrobial action of vanillin against Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus plantarum and Listeria innocua.

Authors:  D J Fitzgerald; M Stratford; M J Gasson; J Ueckert; A Bos; A Narbad
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Redox potential as a key parameter for monitoring and optimization of xylose fermentation with yeast Spathaspora passalidarum under limited-oxygen conditions.

Authors:  Carolina I D G Bonan; Luiz E Biazi; Suzane R Dionísio; Lauren B Soares; Robson Tramontina; Amanda S Sousa; Carlos A de Oliveira Filho; Aline C Costa; Jaciane L Ienczak
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate using Pichia stipitis.

Authors:  Larissa Canilha; Walter Carvalho; Maria das Graças de Almeida Felipe; João Batista de Almeida e Silva; Marco Giulietti
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 2.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.