Literature DB >> 25331461

Physiological response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to weak acids present in lignocellulosic hydrolysate.

Zhongpeng Guo1, Lisbeth Olsson.   

Abstract

Weak acids are present in lignocellulosic hydrolysate as potential inhibitors that can hamper the use of this renewable resource for fuel and chemical production. To study the effects of weak acids on yeast growth, physiological investigations were carried out in batch cultures using glucose as carbon source in the presence of acetic, formic, levulinic, and vanillic acid at three different concentrations at pH 5.0. The results showed that acids at moderate concentrations can stimulate the glycolytic flux, while higher levels of acid slow down the glycolytic flux for both aerobically and anaerobically grown yeast cells. In particular, the flux distribution between respiratory and fermentative growth was adjusted to achieve an optimal ATP generation to allow a maintained energy level as high as it is in nonstressed cells grown exponentially on glucose under aerobic conditions. In addition, yeast cells exposed to acids suffered from severe reactive oxygen species stress and depletion of reduced glutathione commensurate with exhaustion of the total glutathione pool. Furthermore, a higher cellular trehalose content was observed as compared to control cultivations, and this trehalose probably acts to enhance a number of stress tolerances of the yeast.
© 2014 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glycolytic flux; lignocellulosic hydrolysates; reactive oxygen species stress; trehalose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25331461     DOI: 10.1111/1567-1364.12221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res        ISSN: 1567-1356            Impact factor:   2.796


  20 in total

1.  Activation of Haa1 and War1 transcription factors by differential binding of weak acid anions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Myung Sup Kim; Kyung Hee Cho; Kwang Hyun Park; Jyongsik Jang; Ji-Sook Hahn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Metabolomic profiling of Spathaspora passalidarum fermentations reveals mechanisms that overcome hemicellulose hydrolysate inhibitors.

Authors:  Cleilton Santos Lima; Thiago Neitzel; Renan Pirolla; Leandro Vieira Dos Santos; Jaciane Lutz Lenczak; Inês Conceição Roberto; George J M Rocha
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Leveraging Genetic-Background Effects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae To Improve Lignocellulosic Hydrolysate Tolerance.

Authors:  Maria Sardi; Nikolay Rovinskiy; Yaoping Zhang; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.

Authors:  Mickel L A Jansen; Jasmine M Bracher; Ioannis Papapetridis; Maarten D Verhoeven; Hans de Bruijn; Paul P de Waal; Antonius J A van Maris; Paul Klaassen; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Overproduction of docosahexaenoic acid in Schizochytrium sp. through genetic engineering of oxidative stress defense pathways.

Authors:  Xiao Han; Zhaohui Li; Ying Wen; Zhi Chen
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain comparison in glucose-xylose fermentations on defined substrates and in high-gravity SSCF: convergence in strain performance despite differences in genetic and evolutionary engineering history.

Authors:  Vera Novy; Ruifei Wang; Johan O Westman; Carl Johan Franzén; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  A new laboratory evolution approach to select for constitutive acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of causal mutations.

Authors:  Daniel González-Ramos; Arthur R Gorter de Vries; Sietske S Grijseels; Margo C van Berkum; Steve Swinnen; Marcel van den Broek; Elke Nevoigt; Jean-Marc G Daran; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Genome-wide association across Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains reveals substantial variation in underlying gene requirements for toxin tolerance.

Authors:  Maria Sardi; Vaishnavi Paithane; Michael Place; De Elegant Robinson; James Hose; Dana J Wohlbach; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Physiological responses to acid stress by Saccharomyces cerevisiae when applying high initial cell density.

Authors:  Zhong-Peng Guo; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Sodium Acetate Responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the Ubiquitin Ligase Rsp5.

Authors:  Akaraphol Watcharawipas; Daisuke Watanabe; Hiroshi Takagi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.