| Literature DB >> 35620014 |
Quinzia Palazzo1,2, Marco Stagioni3, Steven Raaijmakers4, Robert G Belleman4, Fiorella Prada5,2, Jörg U Hammel6, Simona Fermani1,7, Jaap Kaandorp4, Stefano Goffredo5,2, Giuseppe Falini1,2.
Abstract
Otolith biomineralization results from biochemical processes regulated by the interaction of internal (physiological) and external (environmental) factors which lead to morphological and ultrastructural variability at intra- and interspecific levels. The aim of this study was to conduct a multi-scale analysis of the sagittal otoliths of the Merlucius merlucius (European hake) from the western Adriatic Sea in order to correlate otolith features with fish ontogeny and sex. We show that otoliths of sexually undifferentiated (non-sexed) individuals having a fish body total length (TL) less than 15 cm had faster growth in length, width, area, perimeter, volume and weight and a higher amount of organic matrix compared with otoliths of sexually differentiated individuals (females and males) having a fish size range of 15-50 cm. Most importantly, with increasing fish TL, female saccular otoliths contained a higher number of protuberances and rougher surface compared with male specimens, which showed more uniform mean curvature density. The differences between females and males discovered in this study could be associated with fish hearing adaptation to reproductive behavioural strategies during the spawning season. The outcomes of this research provide insights on how size and sex-related variations in otolith features may be affected by fish ecological and behavioural patterns.Entities:
Keywords: Adriatic sea; Merluccius merluccius; ecomorphology; functional morphology; micro-CT scanning; sagitta
Year: 2022 PMID: 35620014 PMCID: PMC9114930 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 3.653
Regression parameters of the relationships between otolith biometric (OL = otolith length; OW = otolith width; OP = otolith perimeter; OA = otolith area) and morphologic parameters (OC = otolith circularity; OAR = otolith aspect ratio; OR = otolith roundness; OS = otolith solidity) with respect to fish size (TL = total length) of European hake for undifferentiated, females and males. P = power model, E = exponential model, L = linear model; n = sample size; a = constant; b = slope, CI (b) = 95% confidence interval; R2 = coefficient of determination; p = p-value. ANCOVA: Equality of slopes can be rejected when p < 0.05). Post hoc tests provide information on which regression lines were significantly different (≠) from each other in slope. Empty space indicates that the correlation was not significant.
| relationship | fitting model | undifferentiated | females | males | ANCOVA | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI (b) | CI (b) | CI (b) | homogeneity of slopes (b): | ||||||||||||||||||
| TL versus OL | P | 61 | 0.021 | 1.174 | 1.105–1.235 | 0.959 | <0.001 | 83 | 0.066 | 0.938 | 0.914–0.961 | 0.987 | <0.001 | 66 | 0.083 | 0.900 | 0.860–0.940 | 0.970 | <0.001 | 1.37 × 10−08 | U ≠ (F = M) |
| TL versus OW | P | 61 | 0.010 | 1.142 | 1.060–1.224 | 0.930 | <0.001 | 83 | 0.038 | 0.872 | 0.840–0.904 | 0.973 | <0.001 | 66 | 0.044 | 0.852 | 0.804–0.900 | 0.952 | <0.001 | 3.37 × 10−09 | U ≠ (F = M) |
| TL versus OP | P | 61 | 0.029 | 1.307 | 1.240–1.375 | 0.961 | <0.001 | 83 | 0.130 | 1.003 | 0.966–1.041 | 0.972 | <0.001 | 66 | 0.280 | 0.861 | 0.811–0.910 | 0.950 | <0.001 | 1.39 × 10−15 | U ≠ F ≠ M |
| TL versus OA | P | 61 | 0.000 | 2.354 | 2.230–2.482 | 0.959 | <0.001 | 83 | 0.002 | 1.814 | 1.766–1.862 | 0.986 | <0.001 | 66 | 0.003 | 1.742 | 1.666–1.820 | 0.970 | <0.001 | 9.54 × 10−15 | U ≠ (F = M) |
| OP versus OA | P | 61 | 4.407 | 0.547 | 0.523–0.571 | 0.971 | <0.001 | 83 | 4.430 | 0.550 | 0.529–0.569 | 0.987 | <0.001 | 66 | 5.321 | 0.488 | 0.461–0.514 | 0.955 | <0.001 | 7.70 × 10−04 | (U = F) ≠ M |
| TL versus OC | P | 61 | 1.839 | 0.261 | (−0.374)–(−0.149) | 0.268 | <0.001 | 83 | 1.291 | −0.193 | (−0.264)–(−0.122) | 0.264 | <0.001 | 66 | ∕ | ∕ | ∕ | 0.003 | >0.05 | 0.479 | U = F |
| TL versus OAR | P | 61 | ∕ | ∕ | ∕ | 0.001 | >0.05 | 83 | 2.159 | 0.031 | 0.005–0.057 | 0.063 | <0.05 | 66 | ∕ | ∕ | ∕ | 0.014 | >0.05 | ∕ | ∕ |
| TL versus OR | P | 61 | ∕ | ∕ | ∕ | 0.001 | >0.05 | 83 | 0.464 | −0.031 | (−0.057)–(−0.005) | 0.064 | <0.05 | 66 | ∕ | ∕ | ∕ | 0.014 | >0.05 | ∕ | ∕ |
| TL versus OS | P | 61 | ∕ | ∕ | ∕ | 0.000 | >0.05 | 83 | 0.914 | 0.010 | 0.007–0.14 | 0.318 | <0.001 | 66 | 0.883 | 0.017 | 0.012–0.023 | 0.398 | <0.001 | 0.029 | F = M |
| TL versus OV | P | 40 | 0.000 | 3.277 | 2.987–3.566 | 0.933 | <0.001 | 61 | 0.000 | 2.368 | 2.283–2.454 | 0.981 | <0.001 | 47 | 0.000 | 2.361 | 2.208–2.514 | 0.956 | <0.001 | 5.59 × 10−06 | U ≠ (F = M) |
| TL versus Oweight | P | 40 | 0.000 | 3.225 | 2.976–3.473 | 0.948 | <0.001 | 61 | 0.000 | 2.420 | 2.328–2.512 | 0.979 | <0.001 | 47 | 0.000 | 2.437 | 2.277–2.596 | 0.977 | <0.001 | 2.87 × 10−06 | U ≠ (F = M) |
| TL versus Omicro | E | 40 | 3.011 | 0.002 | (−0.001)–(−0.000) | 0.126 | <0.05 | 61 | 2.668 | 0.0 | 0.000–0.000 | 0.696 | <0.001 | 47 | 2.669 | 0.000 | 0.000–0.000 | 0.328 | <0.001 | 1.00 × 10−04 | U ≠ (F = M) |
| TL versus Obulk | E | 40 | ∕ | ∕ | 0.026 | >0.05 | 61 | 2.487 | 0.000 | 0.000–0.000 | 0.553 | <0.001 | 47 | 2.411 | 0.000 | 0.000–0.000 | 0.307 | <0.001 | 5.86 × 10−05 | F ≠ M | |
| TL versus Oporo | L | 40 | ∕ | ∕ | 0.017 | >0.05 | 61 | ∕ | ∕ | ∕ | 0.060 | >0.05 | 47 | 9.700 | −0.015 | (−0.026)–(−0.005) | 0.154 | <0.01 | ∕ | ∕ | |
| TL versus OM% | P | 9 | ∕ | ∕ | 0.029 | >0.05 | 14 | 10.33 | −0.355 | (−0.565)–(−0.145) | 0.531 | <0.01 | 12 | ∕ | ∕ | ∕ | 0.268 | >0.05 | ∕ | ∕ | |
Mean structural parameters, the weight percentage values of the organic matrix (OM%) expressed in terms of weight loss (water + OM) and the initial temperature of the thermal decomposition of CaCO3, together with their standard deviations (s.d.) of undifferentiated, females, males and all the data pooled (total). The undifferentiated had greater weight loss than differentiated showing that the OM could have different roles depending on the ontogenesis. There was also a shift toward lower initial decomposition temperatures with increasing of fish TL, which could be related to a reduced energy barrier of the decomposition process and an increased amount of activated molecule. n = number of samples.
| sex | fish TL (mm) | micro-density (mg mm−3) | bulk density (mg mm−3) | porosity (%) | fish TL (mm) | OM % (w/w) | initial temperature (C°) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean | mean ± s.d. | mean ± s.d. | mean ± s.d. | mean | mean ± s.d. | mean ± s.d. | |||
| undifferentiated | 40 | 134 | 2.74 ± 0.09 | 2.55 ± 0.11 | 6.79 ± 2.92 | 9 | 142 | 1.99 ± 0.28 | 483 ± 37 |
| females | 61 | 280 | 2.77 ± 0.05 | 2.62 ± 0.08 | 5.31 ± 1.90 | 14 | 240 | 1.50 ± 0.67 | 451 ± 13 |
| males | 47 | 249 | 2.76 ± 0.04 | 2.60 ± 0.09 | 5.86 ± 2.38 | 12 | 234 | 1.48 ± 0.24 | 449 ± 13 |
| total | 148 | 231 | 2.76 ± 0.06 | 2.60 ± 0.09 | 5.88 ± 2.42 | 35 | 212 | 1.62 ± 0.32 | 457 ± 25 |
Figure 1(a) Representative surface reconstruction of otolith's internal and external face by Marching Cubes algorithm visualized with ParaView. Fish TL means fish total length. (b) Representative images of detected protuberances (separated by colour) on proximal face (at the top) and sagittal plane (at the bottom) of a reconstructed otolith. (c) Otolith's sample of female (at the top) and male (at the bottom) of M. merluccius. The fish TL for both specimens is 300 mm. Otolith length is 14.6 and 14.4 mm in female and male, respectively. Note the difference in the shape and in the dentate protuberances along the perimeter (more pronounced in female). Otolith perimeter is 45.0 and 38.1 mm in female and male, respectively, while otolith area is almost the same between female (59 mm2) and male (60 mm2).
Figure 2(a) Number of detected protuberances per fish total length for 24 samples. For females and males, a pairwise comparison of equal fish TL was performed. (b) Comparison of distribution plots by kernel density estimation (KDE) for H (mean curvature) on the surface for all female and male otoliths. The distribution for females contains considerably more positive H values in comparison with males (the female curve is shifted to the right). A comparison between distribution plots of H for males and females of equal fish length (see electronic supplementary material) shows the peaks of male otoliths to be consistently higher than its female counterparts. Consequently, the H values on male otoliths are more uniform, which indicates a smoother surface. This is also reflected by the difference in the number of detected protuberances.