Literature DB >> 29146199

Noise can affect acoustic communication and subsequent spawning success in fish.

Karen de Jong1, M Clara P Amorim2, Paulo J Fonseca3, Clive J Fox4, Katja U Heubel5.   

Abstract

There are substantial concerns that increasing levels of anthropogenic noise in the oceans may impact aquatic animals. Noise can affect animals physically, physiologically and behaviourally, but one of the most obvious effects is interference with acoustic communication. Acoustic communication often plays a crucial role in reproductive interactions and over 800 species of fish have been found to communicate acoustically. There is very little data on whether noise affects reproduction in aquatic animals, and none in relation to acoustic communication. In this study we tested the effect of continuous noise on courtship behaviour in two closely-related marine fishes: the two-spotted goby (Gobiusculus flavescens) and the painted goby (Pomatoschistus pictus) in aquarium experiments. Both species use visual and acoustic signals during courtship. In the two-spotted goby we used a repeated-measures design testing the same individuals in the noise and the control treatment, in alternating order. For the painted goby we allowed females to spawn, precluding a repeated-measures design, but permitting a test of the effect of noise on female spawning decisions. Males of both species reduced acoustic courtship, but only painted gobies also showed less visual courtship in the noise treatment compared to the control. Female painted gobies were less likely to spawn in the noise treatment. Thus, our results provide experimental evidence for negative effects of noise on acoustic communication and spawning success. Spawning is a crucial component of reproduction. Therefore, even though laboratory results should not be extrapolated directly to field populations, our results suggest that reproductive success may be sensitive to noise pollution, potentially reducing fitness.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic communication; Aquatic noise pollution; Gobiidae; Multimodal courtship; Spawning success

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29146199     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  9 in total

1.  Sex roles and sexual selection: lessons from a dynamic model system.

Authors:  Trond Amundsen
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.624

2.  Multiscale analysis on otolith structural features reveals differences in ontogenesis and sex in Merluccius merluccius in the western Adriatic Sea.

Authors:  Quinzia Palazzo; Marco Stagioni; Steven Raaijmakers; Robert G Belleman; Fiorella Prada; Jörg U Hammel; Simona Fermani; Jaap Kaandorp; Stefano Goffredo; Giuseppe Falini
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  Multi-modal communication: song sparrows increase signal redundancy in noise.

Authors:  Çağlar Akçay; Michael D Beecher
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Ecology of sound communication in fishes.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  Fish Fish (Oxf)       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 7.218

5.  Continuous but not intermittent noise has a negative impact on mating success in a marine fish with paternal care.

Authors:  Eva-Lotta Blom; Charlotta Kvarnemo; Isabelle Dekhla; Sofie Schöld; Mathias H Andersson; Ola Svensson; M Clara P Amorim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on fishes.

Authors:  Arthur N Popper; Anthony D Hawkins
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.051

7.  A state-space model to derive motorboat noise effects on fish movement from acoustic tracking data.

Authors:  Margarida Barcelo-Serra; Sebastià Cabanellas; Miquel Palmer; Marta Bolgan; Josep Alós
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Toward a decade of ocean science for sustainable development through acoustic animal tracking.

Authors:  Josep Alós; Kim Aarestrup; David Abecasis; Pedro Afonso; Alexandre Alonso-Fernandez; Eneko Aspillaga; Margarida Barcelo-Serra; Jonathan Bolland; Miguel Cabanellas-Reboredo; Robert Lennox; Ross McGill; Aytaç Özgül; Jan Reubens; David Villegas-Ríos
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 13.211

9.  Acoustic deterrents influence foraging activity, flight and echolocation behaviour of free-flying bats.

Authors:  Lia R V Gilmour; Marc W Holderied; Simon P C Pickering; Gareth Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.