| Literature DB >> 35619857 |
Muhammad Amer Awan1,2, Fiza Shaheen1, Aqdus Haq1, Sahar Fatima1.
Abstract
Objective To report the clinical, visual, and safety outcomes of 27 gauge pars plana vitrectomy (27G PPV) in eyes with full thickness and lamellar macular hole (MH). Methodology This retrospective cross-sectional study, conducted at the ophthalmology department of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, was done on 89 eyes of 85 patients who underwent 27G PPV for full-thickness and lamellar MH with a postoperative follow-up period of six months. Results The mean age was 61.9 ± 17.3 years with 57.3% being males. Most of the eyes had idiopathic stage III full-thickness MH (n=34, 38.2 %). The total mean operating time was 42.5 ± 19.8 minutes. During surgery, 48 (53.9%) eyes had concurrent phacoemulsification. Hexafluoroethane was the most commonly used tamponade agent (n=81, 91%). Postoperatively, the primary closure rate was 93.2% (n=83) while the final closure rate was 100% (n=6) either by prolonged posturing (n=3, 3.3%) or by an additional procedure involving autologous internal limiting membrane (ILM) transplant (n=3, 3.3%). The complication rate was 2.2% including iatrogenic retinal tear (n=1, 1.1%) and raised IOP (n=1, 1.1%). The overall best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly from 1.20 ± 0.67 to 0.31 ±0.17 (p=<0.001). Conclusion As per this study, 27G PPV is a practical and efficient surgical system with substantial anatomical success, minimal complication, and considerable visual recovery rates in eyes with full thickness and lamellar MH. We suggest 27G PPV with ILM peeling and medium-acting intraocular gas as the standard procedure for MH.Entities:
Keywords: eye; retina; visual acuity; vitrectomy; vitreoretinal surgery
Year: 2022 PMID: 35619857 PMCID: PMC9125948 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Types of macular hole
Different types of macular holes and their percentages.
MH = macular hole
| Stage and etiology | Number (Percentage) |
| Stage II idiopathic MH | 3 (3.4%) |
| Stage III idiopathic MH | 34 (38.2%) |
| Stage IV idiopathic MH | 32 (36%) |
| Traumatic MH | 9 (10%) |
| Lamellar MH | 11 (12.4%) |
Types of macular holes and tamponade agents used.
Types of tamponade agents and macular holes.
MH = macular hole
| Per-operative Tamponade | Stage and Type of macular hole (MH) |
| Air | Lamellar MH (n=3) |
| SF6 | Stage II (n=1) |
| SF6 | Stage IV (n=1) |
| C2F6 | Stage II (n=2) |
| C2F6 | Stage III (n=34) |
| C2F6 | Stage IV (n=29) |
| C2F6 | Traumatic MH (n=9) |
| C2F6 | Lamellar MH (n=7) |
| C3F8 | Stage IV (n=2) |
Figure 1Visual outcome in different types of macular holes.
It shows preoperative and postoperative visual acuity in different types of macular holes.
MH = macular hole
Previous studies compared to the present study
This table compares previous studies to the present study.
PHF = posterior hyaloid face; MH = macular hole, RPE = retinal pigment epithelium, ILM = inner limiting membrane, SF6 = sulfur hexafluoride, FDP = face down posture, C3F8 = perfluoropropane, RRD = rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, ERM = piretinal membrane.
| Study | System | Sample size | Technique | Duration of surgery in minutes | Primary closure rate | Secondary closure rate | Complications | BCVA Improvement |
| Kelly and Wendel, 1991 [ | 20G | 52 | PHF removal | 58% | 15.3%; increased size of MH (3.8%), mottling of RPE (5.7%), vein occlusion (1.9%) | 73% had improved | ||
| Yoneda et al., 2017 [ | 27G | 26 | ILM peel, SF6 Gas | 34.6± 9.4 | 100% | Improved p- <0.001 | ||
| Stene-Johansen et al., 2019 [ | 23/25G | 198 | ILM peel, SF6 Gas, limited FDP | 93.3% | 42.4%; retinal detachment (0.5%), VH (2.5%), incomplete PVD (1.5%), lens damage (0.5%), retinal break (12.1%), raised IOP (2.5%), cystoid macular edema (1%), cataract (23 cases) | Improved | ||
| Dikci et al., 2019 [ | 23G | 17 | ILM peel, SF6/C3F8 gas | 76.5% | Raised IOP (17.6%), RRD (11.8%), cataract (1.6%), | Improved | ||
| Brown et al., 2020 [ | 25G, 27G | 47, 10 | ILM peel, gas | 32.5, 36.7 | 97.8%, 80% | Retinal tears 4:1 (25g:27g) | Improved P<0.05 | |
| Present study | 27G | 89 | ERM, ILM peel, gas/air, FDP | 42.5 ± 19.8 | 93.2% | 100% | 2.2%; retinal tear (1.1%), raised IOP (1.1%) | Improved P<0.01 |