| Literature DB >> 35619137 |
Yin Xinying1, Li Xin2, Yang Lili1, Zheng Qiuyue1, Piao Yongzhe3, Cao Jijuan4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Seeds were an important medium for long-distance transmission of plant viruses. Therefore, appropriate, more sensitive methods for detecting low concentrations of virus-infected in seeds were crucial to ensure the quality of seed lots. In this study, we have developed a one-step pre-amplification reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay based on the TaqMan technology to detect Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV) in zucchini seeds. RESULT: Seed powder samples with simulated CGMMV-infected at a low concentration were prepared (the mass ratio 1:900 and 1:1000), and their uniformity were verified using one-step pre-amplification RT-qPCR. We used one-step pre-amplification RT-qPCR to detect CGMMV in low-concentration virus-infected seeds and compared this method with universal RT-qPCR and double antibody sandwich-enzyme-linked immunosorbent (DAS-ELISA) assay, the main methods used for virus detection in seeds. The minimum limit of detection (LOD) of the improved one-step pre-amplification RT-qPCR assays for simulated CGMMV-infected seeds in large lots seeds samples were 0.1%.Entities:
Keywords: Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV); Detection; Low concentration virus-infected seed; One-step pre-amplification RT-qPCR; Sensitivity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35619137 PMCID: PMC9134592 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-022-00901-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Methods ISSN: 1746-4811 Impact factor: 5.827
Primers and probes used for the detection of CGMMV in seeds
| Primer | Sequence (5′-3′) | Position | Size of the PCR product (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fw1 | ATCCGGAGTTTTCGATTA | 257–274 | 96 | This work |
| Rev1 | GCATCATCATATATTCCAATTC | 331–352 | ||
| Probe1 | FAM-TTACCGCCACCAAGAACTCTGT-BHQ1 | 278–299 | ||
| Fw2 | GCATAGTGCTTTCCCGTTCAC | 6284–6304 | 101 | [ |
| Rev2 | TGCAGAATTACTGCCCATAGAAAC | 6361–6384 | ||
| Probe2 | FAM-CGGTTTGCTCATTGGTTTGCGGA-BHQ1 | 6315–6337 | ||
| Fw3 | TTGGGCGTTGTGGTTTCTG | 5209–5227 | 90 | [ |
| Rev3 | AGAATGCATCCTTGTGTCAACC | 5277–5298 | ||
| Probe3 | FAM-AATCCTGTAGGGGTGGTGCTACTGT-DQ1 | 5245–5270 |
CGMMV Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus
Fig. 1Comparative homology analysis of target gene sequences of 22 Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV) isolates using DNAStar software. As seen in the figure, the homology between 22 CGMMV isolates and DY13 isolate ranged from 97% to 99.9%
Fig. 2Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV) was detected by improved one-step pre-amplification RT-qPCR. CGMMV-infected single seed sample; CGMMV reference material; simulated CGMMV-contaminated seed powder base material; cucumber mosaic virus (CMV); zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV); melon yellow spot virus (MYSV). Tests were performed using total RNA extracted from leaves and seeds infected with one of the four viruses studied. For each assay, RNA extracted from uninfected seeds was used as negative control, along with a non-template control (NTC). Amplification plots show the normalized fluorescence values (ΔRn) versus the amplification cycle number, and horizontal lines denote the threshold limit of the test. Samples were tested in duplicate. Amplification plots correspond to improved one-step pre-amplification RT-qPCR
CGMMV detection by four methods in simulated virus-contaminated seed powder samples with different mass ratios
| Infected: healthy seed mass ratio | Mass percentage (%)b | Method A | Method B | Method C | Method D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:100 | 1 | 14.13 ± 0.04 | 27.58 ± 0.08 | /f | + d |
| 1:200 | 0.5 | 17.05 ± 0.00 | 29.45 ± 0.01 | / | + |
| 1:300 | 0.333 | 20.78 ± 0.02 | 32.78 ± 0.00 | / | + |
| 1:400 | 0.25 | 23.10 ± 0.04 | 34.02 ± 0.01 | / | + |
| 1:500 | 0.2 | 25.13 ± 0.01 | 35.41 ± 0.02 | 30.70 ± 0.25 | + |
| 1:600 | 0.167 | 25.72 ± 0.01 | 36.01 ± 0.12 | 33.20 ± 0.21 | Undet |
| 1:700 | 0.143 | 26.50 ± 0.06 | 36.57 ± 0.06 | 36.47 ± 0.31 | Undet |
| 1:800 | 0.125 | 27.40 ± 0.01 | 37.37 ± 0.52 | 36.74 ± 0.12 | Undet |
| 1:900 | 0.111 | 28.35 ± 0.23 | 38.64 ± 0.11 | 37.94 ± 0.40 | Undet |
| 1:1000 | 0.1 | 29.18 ± 0.98 | Undet | Undet | Undet |
| Healthy | 0 | Undete | Undet | Undet | Undet |
| Negative | 0 | Undet | Undet | Undet | Undet |
CGMMV Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus
aThe three methods: (A) one-step pre-amplification RT-qPCR; (B) universal RT-qPCR [14, 24]; (C) Universal RT-qPCR for double-quenchen probes [4]; (D) DAS–ELISA
bMass percentage of infected seeds in total seeds, %
cAverage Ct value of two replicates ± SD
d + , positive
eUndet., no amplification detected
fUntested
Evaluation of uniformity in low-concentration CGMMV-infected seed powder samples
| Infected: healthy seed mass ratio | Group | Sum of squares | Degrees of freedom | Mean square | Confidence probability | Sample standard deviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1: 900 | Between groups | 1.332860 | 19 | 0.070151 | 1.16 | 2.09 | 0.95 | 0.069 |
| Within group | 1.212300 | 20 | 0.060615 | |||||
| 1: 1000 | Between groups | 1.510848 | 19 | 0.079518 | 1.25 | 2.09 | 0.95 | 0.089 |
| Within group | 1.276850 | 20 | 0.063843 |
CGMMV Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus
Detection of CGMMV in 33 batches of seeds using three detection methods
| Samples | Numberb | Subsamplesc/batch (m) | Number of positive resultsd (Positive number/total numbere) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method A | Method B | Method C | |||
| Zucchini seeds | 13 | 20 | 3(20/20;20/20;19/20) | 3(20/20;11/20;2/20) | 2(20/20;7/20) |
| Cucumber seeds | 15 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pumpkin Seeds | 5 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CGMMV Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus LOD limit of detection
aThe three methods: (A) pre-amplification RT-qPCR; (B) universal RT-qPCR [14, 24]; (C) DAS–ELISA
bNumber of seed batches
cEach batch of seeds is divided into 20 subsamples, m = 20
dNumber of positive results from 20 subsamples
eRatio of the number of positive results to the number of subsamples
CGMMV detection by four methods in low-concentration virus-infected seed
| Infected: healthy seed mass ratio | Mass percentage (%) b | Subsamplesc (m) | Percentage of positive resultsd (positive detection rate, % e) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method A | Method B | Method C | Method D | |||
| 1:900 | 0.111% | 20 | 20 (100%) | 20 (100%) | 20 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| 1:1000 | 0.1% | 20 | 20 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (10%) | 0 (0%) |
| LOD (mass percentage, %)f | 0.1 | 0.111 | 0.111 | N.T. g | ||
CGMMV Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus, LOD limit of detection
aThe four methods: (A) one-step pre-amplification RT-qPCR; (B) universal RT-qPCR [14, 24]; (C) universal RT-qPCR for double-quenchen probes [4]; (D) DAS–ELISA
bMass percentage of infected seeds in total seeds, %
cnumber of subsamples, m = 20
dNumber of positive results among 20 subsamples
ePercentage of the number of positive results detected in the total number of subsamples, %
fUnder the 95% confidence probability, the positive number of 20 sub samples is detected
gN.T., not tested