Literature DB >> 22502792

Contrast enhanced breast MRI: spatial displacement from prone to supine patient's position. Preliminary results.

Luca Alessandro Carbonaro1, Penampai Tannaphai, Rubina Manuela Trimboli, Nicola Verardi, Maria Paola Fedeli, Francesco Sardanelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the spatial displacement of breast lesions and nipples in MR images when the patient is moved from the standard prone to a supine position close to ultrasound (US) or surgical setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients underwent breast MRI in prone position with dynamic 3D T1-weighted sequences using 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine. Subsequently, the patient was repositioned in supine position and a 3D volumetric interpolated breathhold examination sequence was acquired using a thoracic surface coil. For both positions we measured the following minimal distances: (A) from lesion margin to the coronal plane passing through the anterior surface of the sternum, antero-posterior, on native axial images; (B) from lesion margin to the medial sagittal plane, on native axial images, latero-medial; (C) from lesion margin to the axial plane passing through the tracheal bifurcation, cranio-caudal; (D) from lesion margin to the thoracic wall/pectoral muscle, on native axial images; (E) from lesion margin to the skin, on native axial images; (F) from lesion margin to the base of the nipple, on oblique reconstructions. Measurements from A to D were also obtained for each nipple. The prone-to-supine spatial displacement was calculated as the absolute difference between the measurement obtained in supine position and the same measurement obtained in prone position. Displacements were presented as mean ± standard deviation and median in parenthesis.
RESULTS: Lesion displacements were (mm): A = 60 ± 38 (55); B = 40 ± 26 (41); C = 41 ± 33 (34); D = 32 ± 31 (27); E = 6 ± 5 (7); and F = 8 ± 6 (7). Nipple displacements were (mm): A = 84 ± 44 (91); B = 54 ± 24 (56); C = 27 ± 15 (24); and D = 48 ± 20 (48).
CONCLUSION: These preliminary results show that preoperative breast MRI in prone position implies a median lesion displacement of about 3-6 cm along the three orthogonal directions in comparison with supine MRI. Conversely, median lesion-to-skin and lesion-to-nipple displacements were less than 1cm, even though nipple displacements were similar to or larger than those of lesions. The lesion-to-nipple distance may be the most reliable measure to be used for second look breast US. Larger studies are warranted in order to define an optimized breast MRI protocol in the preoperative setting.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22502792     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  13 in total

1.  Supine breast US: how to correlate breast lesions from prone MRI.

Authors:  Michele Telegrafo; Leonarda Rella; Amato A Stabile Ianora; Giuseppe Angelelli; Marco Moschetta
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Luca A Carbonaro; Martina Pancot; Rossano Girometti; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Predictive detection areas for identifying additional MRI-detected breast lesions on second-look ultrasonography.

Authors:  Akie Tanaka; Atsushi Yamada; Tomoko Umeda; Chiaki Kaneko; Tomoharu Shimizu; Shigeyuki Naka; Tohru Tani; Masaji Tani
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Real-time virtual sonography examination and biopsy for suspicious breast lesions identified on MRI alone.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Kaoru Takahashi; Seiichiro Nishimura; Junichiro Watanabe; Seiji Yamasaki; Takashi Sugino; Takuma Oishi; Yuko Kakuda; Mutsu Sato; Tomomi Hayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Real-time virtual sonography (RVS)-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for lesions initially detected with breast MRI.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Feasibility of mapping breast cancer with supine breast MRI in patients scheduled for oncoplastic surgery.

Authors:  S Joukainen; A Masarwah; M Könönen; M Husso; A Sutela; V Kärjä; R Vanninen; M Sudah
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Martina Zanotel; Viviana Londero; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Textual fiducial detection in breast conserving surgery for a near-real time image guidance system.

Authors:  Winona L Richey; Jon Heiselman; Ma Luo; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16

9.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging findings that affect the magnetic resonance-directed ultrasound correlation of non-mass enhancement lesions: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Almila Coskun Bilge; Pinar Ilhan Demir; Hale Aydin; Isil Esen Bostanci
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  Tips for finding magnetic resonance imaging-detected suspicious breast lesions using second-look ultrasonography: a pictorial essay.

Authors:  Taejun Jeon; Young Seon Kim; Hye Min Son; Seung Eun Lee
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2022-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.