| Literature DB >> 35614979 |
Alessio Carletti1,2, Carlos Cardoso3,4, Jorge Lobo-Arteaga5,6, Sabrina Sales3, Diana Juliao3, Inês Ferreira3, Paula Chainho6, Maria Ana Dionísio6, Maria J Gaudêncio5, Cláudia Afonso3,4, Helena Lourenço3, M Leonor Cancela1,2,7,8, Narcisa M Bandarra3,4, Paulo J Gavaia1,2.
Abstract
Bone metabolic disorders such as osteoporosis are characterized by the loss of mineral from the bone tissue leading to its structural weakening and increased susceptibility to fractures. A growing body of evidence suggests that inflammation and oxidative stress play an important role in the pathophysiological processes involved in the rise of these conditions. As the currently available therapeutic strategies are often characterized by toxic effects associated with their long-term use, natural antioxidants and anti-inflammatory compounds such as polyphenols promise to be a valuable alternative for the prevention and treatment of these disorders. In this scope, the marine environment is becoming an important source of bioactive compounds with potential pharmacological applications. Here, we explored the bioactive potential of three species of holothurians (Echinodermata) and four species of tunicates (Chordata) as sources of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds with a particular focus on polyphenolic substances. Hydroethanolic and aqueous extracts were obtained from animals' biomass and screened for their content of polyphenols and their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Hydroethanolic fractions of three species of tunicates displayed high polyphenolic content associated with strong antioxidant potential and anti-inflammatory activity. Extracts were thereafter tested for their capacity to promote bone formation and mineralization by applying an assay that uses the developing operculum of zebrafish (Danio rerio) to assess the osteogenic activity of compounds. The same three hydroethanolic fractions from tunicates were characterized by a strong in vivo osteogenic activity, which positively correlated with their anti-inflammatory potential as measured by COX-2 inhibition. This study highlights the therapeutic potential of polyphenol-rich hydroethanolic extracts obtained from three species of tunicates as a substrate for the development of novel drugs for the treatment of bone disorders correlated to oxidative stress and inflammatory processes.Entities:
Keywords: anti-inflammatory; antioxidants; natural bioactives; osteogenic; osteoporosis; polyphenols; sea cucumbers; tunicates
Year: 2022 PMID: 35614979 PMCID: PMC9125325 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.888360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Scheme of the protocol used for the evaluation of the osteogenic activity.
Polyphenol content (mg GAE/100 g dw) in aqueous and ethanolic extracts of the studied tunicates and sea cucumbers.
| Polyphenol content (mg GAE/100 g dw) | ||
| Extract | ||
| Species | Aqueous | Ethanolic |
|
| 31 ± 6 | 40 ± 7 |
| 260 ± 13 | 365 ± 21 | |
|
| 428 ± 10 | 669 ± 11 |
|
| 103 ± 8 | 206 ± 14 |
|
| 84 ± 4 | 9 ± 5 |
| 79 ± 1 | 21 ± 17 | |
|
| 48 ± 2 | nd |
Values are presented as average ± standard deviation. For all groups, n = 3. Nd, not detected. Different lowercase letters within a column correspond to statistical differences (p < 0.05) between different species and same extract type (ethanolic or aqueous, respectively). Different uppercase letters within a row correspond to statistical differences (p < 0.05) between aqueous and ethanolic extracts from the same species.
Antioxidant activity as measured by ABTS (μmol eq TROLOX/100 g dw), FRAP (μmol eq FeSO4/g dw), and DPPH (mg eq AA/100 g dw) in aqueous and ethanolic extracts of the studied tunicates and sea cucumbers.
| ABTS (μ mol eq TROLOX/100 g dw) | FRAP (μ mol eq FeSO4/g dw) | DPPH (mg eq AA/100 g dw) | ||||
| Extract | Extract | Extract | ||||
| Species | Aqueous | Ethanolic | Aqueous | Ethanolic | Aqueous | Ethanolic |
|
| 1,126 ± 81 | 552 ± 60 | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 10.9 | nd |
| 6,206 ± 180 | 5,020 ± 20 | 34.3 ± 0.4 | 34.2 ± 0.1 | nd | 102.0 ± 1.6 | |
|
| 6,735 ± 11 | 5,886 ± 83 | 54.6 ± 0.4 | 56.5 ± 0.0 | 16.7 ± 4.1 | 179.0 ± 1.7 |
|
| 4,271 ± 109 | 3,027 ± 56 | 19.7 ± 0.6 | 15.6 ± 0.6 | 151.7 ± 4.4 | 162.7 ± 2.5 |
|
| 2,234 ± 136 | 166 ± 35 | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | nd | 13.5 ± 12.7 |
|
| 3,089 ± 158 | 33 ± 57 | 6.2 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 31.8 ± 6.2 | 5.7 ± 9.8 |
|
| 1,883 ± 81 | nd | 8.9 ± 0.5 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 106.1 ± 4.7 | nd |
Values are presented as average ± standard deviation. nd, not detected. For all groups, n = 3. Different lowercase letters within a column correspond to statistical differences (p < 0.05) between different species and same extract type (ethanolic or aqueous, respectively). For each antioxidant methodology, different uppercase letters within a row correspond to statistical differences (p < 0.05) between aqueous and ethanolic extracts from the same species.
Anti-inflammatory activity (% inhibition of COX-2) in aqueous and ethanolic extracts of the studied tunicates and sea cucumber species.
| Anti-inflammatory activity (% inhibition COX-2) | ||
| Extract | ||
| Species | Aqueous ( | Ethanolic ( |
|
| 19.6 ± 5.8 | 76.7 ± 3.4 |
| 27.8 ± 2.5 | 70.2 ± 6.3 | |
|
| 8.9 ± 3.7 | 75.9 ± 3.0 |
|
| 33.2 ± 5.2 | 92.2 ± 8.5 |
|
| nd | 40.0 ± 7.6 |
|
| nd | 41.8 ± 4.9 |
|
| nd | 16.4 ± 9.7 |
Values are presented as average ± standard deviation. nd, not detected. For all groups, n = 4. Different lowercase letters within a column correspond to statistical differences (p < 0.05) between different species within same type of extract. Different uppercase letters within a row correspond to statistical differences (p < 0.05) between aqueous and ethanolic extracts from the same species.
Acute developmental toxicity of the AQ and HE extracts from sea cucumbers and tunicates assessed in zebrafish larvae.
| Species | Extract | Concentration | S72 h | Concentration | S72 h |
|
| AQ |
| 15/15 | – | – |
|
| HE |
| 15/15 | 100 | 15/15 |
| AQ |
| 15/15 | – | – | |
| HE |
| 15/15 | 100 | 15/15 | |
|
| AQ |
| 15/15 | – | – |
|
| HE |
| 15/15 | 100 | 15/15 |
|
| AQ |
| 15/15 | – | – |
|
| HE |
| 15/15 | 100 | 15/15 |
|
| AQ | 200 | 15/15 | – | – |
|
| HE | 200 | 11/15 |
| 15/15 |
|
| AQ |
| 15/15 | – | – |
|
| HE |
| 15/15 | 100 | 15/15 |
|
| AQ |
| 15/15 | – | – |
|
| HE |
| 15/15 | 100 | 15/15 |
Two concentrations have been tested for each extract. Final survival after 72 h of exposure (S
FIGURE 2Osteogenic activity of aqueous (A) and hydroethanolic (B) extracts from four species of tunicates in zebrafish larvae. Results are displayed as corrected operculum area (operculum area/head ratio) expressed as percentage of increase over the control. Representative image (C) of a fish treated with the negative control (ethanol), the positive control (Calcitriol 10 pg/mL) and the most powerful osteogenic extracts among tunicates (Aplidium sp. HE200). Statistical differences among the means were tested through one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05) or, whenever normality and homoscedasticity weren’t met, through a non-parametric test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05). P-values are indicated as follow: 0.0021. (**), < 0.0001 (****). HE, hydroethanolic extracts, AQ, aqueous extracts, 100–100 μg/mL, 200–200 μg/mL.
FIGURE 3Osteogenic activity of aqueous (A) and hydroethanolic (B) extracts from three species of sea cucumbers in zebrafish larvae. Results are displayed as corrected operculum area (operculum area/head ratio) expressed as percentage of increase over the control. Representative image (C) of a fish treated with the negative control (ethanol), the positive control (Calcitriol 10 pg/mL) and the most powerful osteogenic extracts among holothurians (H. mammata HE200). Statistical differences among the means were tested through one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05) or, whenever normality and homoscedasticity weren’t met, through a non-parametric test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05). P-values are indicated as follow: 0.0332 (*), 0.0002 (***), < 0.0001 (****). HE, hydroethanolic extracts, AQ, aqueous extracts, 100–100 μg/mL, 200–200 μg/mL.