| Literature DB >> 35614499 |
Kunzhe Lin1,2, Kaichun Fan3, Shuwen Mu2, Shousen Wang4,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors influencing the development of diabetes insipidus after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas.Entities:
Keywords: Cephalocaudal tumor cavity; Diabetes insipidus; Multivariate; Pituitary adenoma; Transsphenoidal surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35614499 PMCID: PMC9131668 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00700-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Med Res ISSN: 0949-2321 Impact factor: 4.981
Fig. 1The imaginary angle drawn between the two edges of diaphragma sellae begins its elevation and the highest point of the diaphragma sellae
Fig. 2Coronal contrast-enhanced images of the difference in pituitary stalk deviation angle before and after transsphenoidal surgery. A Before surgery, the pituitary stalk deviates 36.16° to the right. B After surgery, the pituitary stalk deviation angle of this patient is 36.16° to 20.92°
Fig. 3Coronal contrast-enhanced images of the change in cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter after transsphenoidal surgery in 2 cases. A–B, C–D are from the same patient, respectively. A Before surgery, the cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter is 24.84 mm. B After surgery, the cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter is 20.38 mm, and the change in cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter after transsphenoidal surgery of this patient is 24.84–20.38 mm. C Before surgery, the cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter is 27.42 mm. D After surgery, the cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter is 11.48 mm, and the change in cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter after transsphenoidal surgery of this patient is 27.42–11.48 mm
Univariate analysis of postoperative DI
| Factors | Non-postoperative DI ( | Postoperative DI ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 48 (37, 59) | 51 (40, 63) | 0.540 |
| Sex | |||
| Wen | 65 (30.7%) | 50 (23.6%) | 0.118 |
| Women | 65 (30.7%) | 32 (15.1%) | |
| Preoperative cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter (mm) | 23.0 (18.7, 28.7) | 26.4 (20.9, 33.9) | 0.016 |
| Tumor size (cm3) | 4.1 (2.4, 6.6) | 4.9 (2.8, 8.1) | 0.104 |
| Tumor size classification | |||
| Macroadenoma | 112 (52.8%) | 37 (17.5%) | < 0.001 |
| Giant pituitary adenoma | 18 (8.5%) | 45 (21.2%) | |
| Pathological tumor type | |||
| Gonadotropinoma | 39 (18.4%) | 35 (16.5%) | 0.536 |
| Null-cell adenoma | 34 (16.0%) | 20 (9.4%) | |
| PRL cell adenoma | 19 (8.9%) | 7 (3.3%) | |
| GH cell adenoma | 11 (5.2%) | 4 (1.9%) | |
| ACTH cell adenoma | 15 (7.1%) | 8 (3.8%) | |
| Plurihormonal | 11 (5.2%) | 7 (3.3%) | |
| Thyroid cell adenoma | 1 (0.5%) | 1 (0.5%) | |
| Intratumoral cysts or hematoma | |||
| Yes | 48 (22.6%) | 40 (18.9%) | 0.088 |
| No | 82 (38.7%) | 42 (19.8%) | |
| PPBS occurrence | |||
| Positive | 116 (54.7%) | 71 (33.5%) | 0.561 |
| Negative | 14 (6.6%) | 11 (5.2%) | |
| Invasiveness | |||
| Yes | 20 (9.4%) | 12 (5.7%) | 0.882 |
| No | 110 (51.9%) | 70 (33.0%) | |
| The imaginary angle (°) | 91.0 (75.7, 105.3) | 86.0 (68.75, 97.3) | 0.069 |
| Postoperative cephalocaudal Tumor cavity diameter (mm) | 15.3 (12.0, 19.1) | 14.6 (10.0, 17.7) | 0.08 |
| Change in cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter after TSS (mm) | 7.17 (2.8, 11.9) | 10.6 (5.9, 17.1) | < 0.001 |
| Preoperative pituitary stalk deviation angle (°) | 40.5 (29.5, 51.0) | 45.5 (29.7, 55.0) | 0.061 |
| Postoperative pituitary stalk deviation angle (°) | 29.0 (16.5, 40.5) | 29.0 (16.0, 38.5) | 0.612 |
| Difference in pituitary stalk deviation angle (°) | 3 (0, 17.2) | 11.5 (0, 22) | 0.003 |
| Extent of tumor resection | |||
| Total resection | 103 (48.6%) | 70 (33.0%) | 0.515 |
| Subtotal resection | 17 (8.0%) | 7 (3.3%) | |
| Partial resection | 10 (4.7%) | 5 (2.4%) | |
| Intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks | |||
| Yes | 22 (10.3%) | 16 (7.5%) | 0.632 |
| No | 108 (50.9%) | 66 (31.3%) | |
| Length of stay after surgery | 7 (6, 8) | 7 (6, 9) | 0.229 |
Data were expressed as means (standard deviations), medians (interquartile ranges) or numbers (proportions)
DI diabetes insipidus, PPBS posterior pituitary bright spot, TSS transsphenoidal surgery, The imaginary angle the imaginary angle drawn between the two edges of diaphragm sellae begins its elevation and the highest point of the diaphragm sellae
Logistic regression analysis of risk of postoperative DI onset
| Factors | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Change in cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter after TSS | 1.080 | 1.005, 1.160 | 0.037 |
| Difference in pituitary stalk deviation angle | 1.017 | 0.992, 1.042 | 0.192 |
| Preoperative cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter | 0.979 | 0.924, 1.036 | 0.457 |
| Tumor size classification | 1.537 | 0.535, 4.412 | 0.424 |
DI diabetes insipidus; OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, TSS transsphenoidal surgery