| Literature DB >> 25163653 |
Shousen Wang1, Shun'an Lin, Liangfeng Wei, Lin Zhao, Yinxing Huang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of giant pituitary adenomas is difficult due to complicated dissection of the sellar area. The extent of tumor resection affects the efficacy of surgical treatment. This study is to investigate the efficacy of microsurgical treatment for giant pituitary adenoma and to analyze the relationship between treatment efficacy and tumor resection extent.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25163653 PMCID: PMC4154382 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Surg ISSN: 1471-2482 Impact factor: 2.102
Clinical features of 36 giant pituitary adenoma patients
| Decreased visual acuitya | 33 | 97.1 |
| Headache and dizziness | 11 | 30.6 |
| Coma | 2 | 5.6 |
| Dysendocrinia | 17 | 47.2 |
| Irregular menstruation | 2 | 5.6 |
| Acromegaly & irregular menstruation | 1 | 2.8 |
| Decreased sexual function | 5 | 13.7 |
| Amenorrhea | 6 | 16.7 |
| Hypothyrea | 3 | 8.3 |
Note: aDecreased visual acuity includes blindness, light sensitivity, finger counting and blurred vision.
Endocrine diagnosis and immunohistochemical subtypes of patients (n = 36)
| | | |
| Non-functioning adenoma | 26 | 72.2 |
| Prolactin-secreting adenoma | 7 | 27.8 |
| Thyrotropin-secreting adenoma | 2 | 5.6 |
| Growth hormone-secreting adenoma | 1 | 2.8 |
| | | |
| Gonadotropin-secreting adenoma | 14 | 38.9 |
| Null cell adenomas | 12 | 33.3 |
| Prolactin-secreting adenoma | 6 | 16.7 |
| Thyrotropin-secreting adenoma | 3 | 8.3 |
| Multi hormone-secreting adenoma | 1 | 2.8 |
Note: aClinical endocrine diagnosis was in accordance with WHO Classification, 2004 [12].
Comparison of resection rate between different groups (n = 34)
| Pituitary adenoma with CSI | 14 | 41.2 | 62.0* |
| Pituitary adenoma without CSI | 20 | 58.8 | 77.4 |
| Transsphenoidal surgery | 28 | 82.4 | 74.3 |
| Craniotomy | 6 | 17.6 | 66.8 |
Note: CSI, cavernous sinus invasion.
*P < 0.05, pituitary adenoma with CSI vs. pituitary adenoma without CSI, Mann–Whitney U test.
Comparison of tumor resection rate with postoperative hormone (n = 10) and postoperative visual acuity (n = 24) improvement
| Number of cases | 2 | 8 | 9 | 15 |
| Average tumor resection rate (%) | 72.3 | 83.5 | 60.4* | 79.5 |
Note: aComparison of tumor resection rate in hormone levels in 10 patients with functional pituitary adenomas before and 24 hours after surgery. bComparison of tumor resection rate in visual acuity in 24 patients with decreased visual acuity before and 24 hours after surgery.
*P < 0.05, average tumor resection rate with remained visual acuity vs. average tumor resection rate with improved visual acuity, Mann–Whitney U test.
Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score of the follow-up patients (n = 25)
| Number | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 16 |
| Rate (%) | 0 | 0 | 8 | 28 | 64 |
Figure 1MRI of representative cases before and after surgery. (A) and (B) Coronal and sagittal MRI of Case 1 before surgery. (C) and (D) Coronal and sagittal MRI of Case 1 at 7 days after surgery. (E) and (F) Coronal and sagittal MRI of Case 2 before surgery. (G) and (H) Coronal and sagittal enhanced MRI of Case 2 at 2 days after surgery. (I) and (J) Coronal and sagittal MRI of Case 3 before surgery. (K) and (L) Coronal and sagittal enhanced MRI of case 3 at 2 days after surgery. (M) and (N) Coronal and sagittal MRI of Case 3 at 6 months after the first surgery. (O) and (P) Coronal and sagittal MRI of Case 3 at 1 year after the second surgery.