| Literature DB >> 35614435 |
Adam Jacobson1, Shahzad I Mian1, Brenda L Bohnsack2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evaluate outcomes and identify prognostic factors in congenital aniridia.Entities:
Keywords: Aniridia; Cataract; Glaucoma; Glaucoma drainage device; Keratopathy; Keratoplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35614435 PMCID: PMC9131660 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02460-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.086
Fig. 1Pedigree of 4-Generation Family with Aniridia. Pedigree of 4 generation family that includes 19 individuals with aniridia. Seven members have a previously reported PAX6 (NM_000280.4) c.565TC > T frame shift mutation that results in a premature stop codon. An additional seven individuals with aniridia were related by marriage in the second generation
Fig. 2Proportion of Aniridic Individuals with Cataract, Glaucoma and Keratopathy. A At presentation, 66% of aniridic eyes were phakic while 26% had undergone cataract surgery and were either pseudophakic (16%) or aphakic (10%). The remaining eyes were either enucleated (2%) or the lens status was unknown (5%) due to corneal opacification. At final follow-up, 48% of the eyes were phakic, 29% were pseudophakic, 16% were aphakic, 3% were enucleated and 4% had unknown status due to corneal pacification. B Forty percent of eyes had a diagnosis of glaucoma at presentation and 9% had already undergone at least 1 IOP-lowering surgery. Glaucoma diagnosis increased to 52% at final follow-up and 26% of eyes required glaucoma surgery. C At presentation, 57% of aniridic eye had keratopathy and 0.5% had undergone corneal surgery. At final follow-up, the percent of eyes with keratopathy increased to 65% and 23% had at least 1 corneal surgery
Glaucoma Surgery
| Glaucoma Surgery (n) | Previous Glaucoma Surgeries | Success at Final Follow-up | Success Exclusion | Success with Exclusion at Final Follow-up | Length of Follow-up (yrs) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | ||||||
| 23 eyes | 7 eyes | 5 eyes | 71% (25 of 35 Eyes) | Tube Revision | 89% (31 of 35 Eyes) | 14.2 ± 15.4 | |
| 16 eyes | 4 eyes | 3 eyes | 74% (17 of 23 Eyes) | 87% (20 of 23 Eyes) | 13.2 ± 14.3 | ||
| 3 eyes | 3 eyes | 2 eyes | 63% (5 of 8 Eyes) | 88% (7 of 8 Eyes) | 17.5 ± 20.1 | ||
| 4 eyes | 75% (3 of 4 Eyes) | 100% (4 of 4 Eyes) | 2.7 ± 3.6 | ||||
| 14 eyes | 6 eyes | 1 eye | 24% (5 of 21 Eyes) | Bleb Revision | 33% (7 of 14 Eyes) | 21.7 ± 14.1 | |
| 8 eyes | 1 eye | 33% (3 of 9 Eyes) | Repeat Angle Surgery | 33% (3 of 9 Eyes) | 16.3 ± 17.8 | ||
| 4 eyes | 1 eye | 40% (2 of 5 Eyes) | 40% (2 of 5 Eyes) | 26.6 ± 15.3 | |||
| 4 eyes | 25% (1 of 4 Eyes) | 25% (1 of 4 Eyes) | 0.9 ± 1.3 | ||||
| 3 eyes | 4 eyes | 5 eyes | 33% (4 of 12 Eyes) | Multiple Cyclo-Ablations | 50% (6 of 12 Eyes) | 23.4 ± 12.0 | |
| 1 eye | 1 eye | 3 eyes | 40% (2 of 5 Eyes) | 60% (3 of 5 Eyes) | 19.8 ± 7.4 | ||
| 2 eyes | 3 eyes | 1 eye | 17% (1 of 6 Eyes) | 33% (2 of 6 Eyes) | 20.5 ± 8.6 | ||
| 1 eye | 100% (1 of 1 Eye) | 100% (1 of 1 Eye) | 43.4 | ||||
Fig. 3Survival Curves of Corneal Surgery in Aniridia. A Kaplan–Meier survival rates of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) were 90% with 95% CI [71, 96] at 1-year, 43% with 95% CI [23, 62] at 10-years, and 20% with 95% CI [6,40] at 25-years. Keratoprosthesis (KPro) survival rate at 1-year, 5-years, and 10-years was 95% with 95% CI [70, 99] and 83% with 95% CI [55, 94] at 5-years, and 64% with 95% CI [32, 84], respectively. B Survival rates of limbal stem cell transplantation (LSCT) were 75% with 95% CI [13, 96] at 1-year and 25% with 95% CI [1, 66] at 5-years. Descemet stripping and endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) 1-year survival rate was 75% with 95% CI [13, 96] and decreased to 25% with 95% CI [1, 66] at 2 years. Five-year, 10-year, and 15-year survival rates of lamellar keratoplasty (LK) were 88% with 95% CI [40, 99], 63% with 95% CI [23, 87], and 31% with 95% CI [6, 64], respectively
Fig. 4Visual Acuity Outcomes. A At final follow-up of the 188 eyes, 30% of eyes had LogMAR VA ≤ 0.9 (BCVA better than 20/200) and 6% had LogMAR VA ≤ 0.4 (BCVA 20/50 or better). Fifty-seven percent of eyes had LogMAR VA ≥ 1.0 (BCVA 20/200 or worse) with 9% unable to detect light. Thirteen percent of patients were too young to cooperate with optotype testing. B Analysis of the better seeing eye showed that 50% of the patients met the legal definition of blindness with LogMAR VA ≥ 1.0 (20/200 or worse) at final follow-up. One percent of patients were not able to detect light with either eye. Thirty-eight percent of patients had LogMAR VA ≤ 0.9 (better than 20/200) and 9% of patients had LogMAR VA ≤ 0.4 (20/50 or better). C In the 133 of 188 eyes that were able to complete optotype visual acuity testing at both initial and final visits, 34% of eyes showed stable VA (< 0.1 change in LogMAR VA) and 16% of eyes had an improvement in VA. Twenty-one percent of eyes showed worse LogMAR VA at final follow-up. Twenty-nine percent of patients lacked optotypte testing at either presentation or final follow-up. D Analysis of the better seeing eye showed that 35% of patients had stable VA (< 0.1 change in LogMAR VA) at initial and final follow-up. Seventeen percent of patients had improved LogMAR VA while 19% had worse VA at final follow-up compared to presentation