Literature DB >> 35613912

Veteran and Staff Experience from a Pilot Program of Health Care System-Distributed Wearable Devices and Data Sharing.

Jason J Saleem1,2, Nancy R Wilck3, John J Murphy3, Jennifer Herout3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The growing trend to use wearable devices to track activity and health data has the potential to positively impact the patient experience with their health care at home and with their care team. As part of a pilot program, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) distributed Fitbits to Veterans through four VA medical centers. Our objective was to assess the program from both Veterans' and clinicians' viewpoints. Specifically, we aimed to understand barriers to Fitbit setup and use for Veterans, including syncing devices with a VA mobile application (app) to share data, and assess the perceived value of the device functions and ability to share information from the Fitbit with their care team. In addition, we explored the clinicians' perspective, including how they expected to use the patient-generated health data (PGHD).
METHODS: We performed semi-structured interviews with 26 Veterans and 16 VA clinicians to assess the program. Responses to each question were summarized in order of frequency of occurrence across participants and audited by an independent analyst for accuracy.
RESULTS: Our findings reveal that despite setup challenges, there is support for the use of Fitbits to engage Veterans and help manage their health. Clinicians believed there were benefits for having Veterans use the Fitbits and expected to use the PGHD in a variety of ways as part of the Veterans' care plans, including monitoring progress toward health behavior goals. Veterans were overwhelmingly enthusiastic about using the Fitbits; this enthusiasm seems to extend beyond the 3 month "novelty period."
CONCLUSION: The pilot program for distributing Fitbits to Veterans appears to be successful from both Veterans' and clinicians' perspectives and suggests that expanded use of wearable devices should be considered. Future studies will need to carefully consider how to incorporate the PGHD into the electronic health record and clinical workflow. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35613912      PMCID: PMC9132736          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.762


  26 in total

Review 1.  Wearable activity trackers for promoting physical activity: A systematic meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Caining Li; Xiaoyu Chen; Xinhua Bi
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Incentives to create and sustain healthy behaviors: technology solutions and research needs.

Authors:  Deydre S Teyhen; Matt Aldag; Damon Centola; Elton Edinborough; Jason D Ghannadian; Andrea Haught; Theresa Jackson; Julie Kinn; Kevin J Kunkler; Betty Levine; Valerie E Martindale; David Neal; Leslie B Snyder; Mindi A Styn; Frances Thorndike; Valerie Trabosh; David J Parramore
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Provider Preference in Exam Room Layout Design and Computing.

Authors:  Jacob M Read; Dustin T Weiler; Tyler Satterly; Catarina Soares; Jason J Saleem
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Investigating the need for clinicians to use tablet computers with a newly envisioned electronic health record.

Authors:  Jason J Saleem; April Savoy; Gale Etherton; Jennifer Herout
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Exploring the persistence of paper with the electronic health record.

Authors:  Jason J Saleem; Alissa L Russ; Connie F Justice; Heather Hagg; Patricia R Ebright; Peter A Woodbridge; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 6.  Sensors and Functionalities of Non-Invasive Wrist-Wearable Devices: A Review.

Authors:  Aida Kamišalić; Iztok Fister; Muhamed Turkanović; Sašo Karakatič
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Evolution of Wearable Devices with Real-Time Disease Monitoring for Personalized Healthcare.

Authors:  Kyeonghye Guk; Gaon Han; Jaewoo Lim; Keunwon Jeong; Taejoon Kang; Eun-Kyung Lim; Juyeon Jung
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.076

8.  Beyond novelty effect: a mixed-methods exploration into the motivation for long-term activity tracker use.

Authors:  Grace Shin; Yuanyuan Feng; Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi; Nicci Gafinowitz
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2018-12-04

Review 9.  Sensor, Wearable, and Remote Patient Monitoring Competencies for Clinical Care and Training: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Donald M Hilty; Christina M Armstrong; Amanda Edwards-Stewart; Melanie T Gentry; David D Luxton; Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Technol Behav Sci       Date:  2021-01-22

Review 10.  Fitbit-Based Interventions for Healthy Lifestyle Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mickael Ringeval; Gerit Wagner; James Denford; Guy Paré; Spyros Kitsiou
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  1 in total

1.  Donating Health Data to Research: Influential Characteristics of Individuals Engaging in Self-Tracking.

Authors:  Katharina Pilgrim; Sabine Bohnet-Joschko
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.